Literature DB >> 16345151

Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters.

J H Standridge1.   

Abstract

The surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters was studied by using scanning electron microscopy. The differences observed are presented as a possible explanation for reported discrepancies in coliform recovery from water.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID： 16345151      PMCID： PMC169766          DOI： 10.1128/aem.31.2.316-319.1976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN： 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  5 in total

1.  Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms.

Authors:  K J Sladek; R V Suslavich; B I Sohn; F W Dawson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.

Authors:  D J Schaeffer; M C Long; K G Janardan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

3.  Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.

Authors:  W G Presswood; L R Brown
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-09

4.  Evaluating the membrane fecal coliform test by using Escherichia coli as the indicator organism.

Authors:  J B Hufham
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-04

5.  Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies.

Authors:  B J Dutka; M J Jackson; J B Bell
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-09
  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Comparison of various brands of membrane filters for their ability to recover fungi from water.

Authors:  A A Qureshi; B J Dutka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters.

Authors:  R S Tobin; B J Dutka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water.

Authors:  R S Tobin; P Lomax; D J Kushner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Improved bacterial recovery by membrane filters in the presence of food debris.

Authors:  J M Farber; A N Sharpe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.