Literature DB >> 2106827

New screening test to determine the acceptability of 0.45-micron membrane filters for analysis of water.

K P Brenner1, C C Rankin.   

Abstract

During routine membrane filter (MF) quality control testing, irregularities such as partial or complete inhibition of microbial growth at grid lines, abnormal spreading of colonies, growth in or along the grid lines, nonwetting areas, poor colony sheen and metallic sheen on the MF surface with mEndo agar, brittleness, decreased recovery, and severe wrinkling were observed with several lots of filters. To study these effects and to develop a more sensitive screening test for MF quality, we compared five different MFs with various types and degrees of defects by using five stock coliform cultures and five different media. Results showed that the Enterobacter aerogenes-tryptic soy agar test system detected more MF defects than any other combination did and was superior to the Escherichia coli-mFC agar American Society for Testing and Materials method for grid line inhibition. Filtered natural samples grown on the same media showed the same effects as were observed with the pure cultures. Poor colony sheen and sheen on the MF surface were best detected with Enterobacter aerogenes on mEndo agar. The use of tryptic soy agar and mEndo agar with this organism permitted the maximum detection of MF irregularities. Of the 142 MF lots tested by this method, 30% were acceptable, 10% were marginally acceptable, and 61% were unacceptable. This method provides a valuable screening test for determining the acceptability of 0.45-microm-pore-size MFs used for coliform and heterotroph analysis and may also be useful in conjunction with other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2106827      PMCID: PMC183250          DOI: 10.1128/aem.56.1.54-64.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria.

Authors:  B L Green; E Clausen; W Litsky
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters.

Authors:  M H Brodsky; D A Schiemann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-11

3.  Detergents in membrane filters.

Authors:  R D Cahn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-01-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The presence-absence coliform test for monitoring drinking water quality.

Authors:  E W Rice; E E Geldreich; E J Read
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Technical considerations in applying the membrane filter procedure.

Authors:  E E Geldreich; H L Jeter; J A Winter
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1967-04

6.  Membrane filter staining method: bacterial plate counts in 24 H.

Authors:  K M Tse; C M Lewis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Evaluation of m-T7 agar as a fecal coliform medium.

Authors:  M W LeChevallier; P E Jakanoski; A K Camper; G A McFeters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Improved bacterial recovery by membrane filters in the presence of food debris.

Authors:  J M Farber; A N Sharpe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Membrane filter method for enumerating Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A P Dufour; E R Strickland; V J Cabelli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies.

Authors:  B J Dutka; M J Jackson; J B Bell
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  A rapid method for the detection of representative coliforms in water samples: polymerase chain reaction-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (PCR-ELISA).

Authors:  Jong-Tar Kuo; Chiu-Yu Cheng; Hsiao-Han Huang; Chia-Fen Tsao; Ying-Chien Chung
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Identification of Francisella tularensis by both culture and real-time TaqMan PCR methods from environmental water specimens in outbreak areas where tularemia cases were not previously reported.

Authors:  H Simşek; M Taner; A Karadenizli; M Ertek; H Vahaboğlu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Bacterial capture by peptide-mimetic oligoacyllysine surfaces.

Authors:  Shahar Rotem; Nili Raz; Yechezkel Kashi; Amram Mor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of membrane filters for recovery of legionellae from water samples.

Authors:  L Smith; K Carroll; S Mottice
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  A comparison of bacterial indicators and methods in rural surface waters.

Authors:  Robin W Kloot; Bobby Radakovich; Xiaoqing Huang; Daniel Duke Brantley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Comparison of the recoveries of Escherichia coli and total coliforms from drinking water by the MI agar method and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved membrane filter method.

Authors:  K P Brenner; C C Rankin; M Sivaganesan; P V Scarpino
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Sensitivity and Selectivity of Two Commercially Available Media for Legionella spp. Recovery from Environmental Water Samples.

Authors:  Savina Ditommaso; Monica Giacomuzzi; Gabriele Memoli; Jacopo Garlasco; Carla M Zotti
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-06-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.