Literature DB >> 4608420

Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.

D J Schaeffer, M C Long, K G Janardan.   

Abstract

The recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membranes was analyzed by using both a model I (which assumes no error in the x variable) and model II (which allows errors in both the variables) regression analysis. The two models afford estimates of the slope which agree within their 95% confidence limits. Using equations derived in this paper, the model II confidence limits on the intercept are obtained. This range does not include the model I intercept limits, thereby demonstrating the differences between results from an incorrect (model I) and correct (model II) approach. In addition, fecal coliform show no differences in response to the two membranes, whereas total coliform exhibit higher recoveries on Gelman membranes.

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4608420      PMCID: PMC186781          DOI: 10.1128/am.28.4.605-607.1974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0003-6919


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of Gelman and Millipore membrane filters for enumerating fecal coliform bacteria.

Authors:  W G Presswood; L R Brown
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-09
  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Influence of coliform source on evaluation of membrane filters.

Authors:  M H Brodsky; D A Schiemann
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-11

2.  Enumeration of high numbers of bacteria using hydrophobic grid-membrane filters.

Authors:  A N Sharpe; G L Michaud
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

3.  Evaluation of coli-count samplers for possible use in standard couting of total and fecal coliforms in recreational waters.

Authors:  M Hedberg; D A Connor
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-11

4.  Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters.

Authors:  J H Standridge
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Evaluation of recovery methods to detect coliforms in water.

Authors:  G K Bissonnette; J J Jezeski; G A McFeters; D G Stuart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of various brands of membrane filters for their ability to recover fungi from water.

Authors:  A A Qureshi; B J Dutka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of the surface structure, metal binding, and fecal coliform recoveries of nine membrane filters.

Authors:  R S Tobin; B J Dutka
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water.

Authors:  R S Tobin; P Lomax; D J Kushner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Fecal indicator bacteria persistence under natural conditions in an ice-covered river.

Authors:  C V Davenport; E B Sparrow; R C Gordon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.792

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.