Literature DB >> 16345212

Evaluation of recovery methods to detect coliforms in water.

G K Bissonnette1, J J Jezeski, G A McFeters, D G Stuart.   

Abstract

Various recovery methods used to detect coliforms in water were evaluated by applying the membrane filter chamber technique. The membrane filter chambers, containing pure-culture suspensions of Escherichia coli or natural suspensions of raw sewage, were immersed in the stream environment. Samples were withdrawn from the chamber at regular time intervals and enumerated by several detection methods. In general, multiple-tube fermentation techniques gave better recovery than plating or membrane filtration procedures. The least efficient method of recovery resulted when using membrane filtration procedures, especially as the exposure period of the organisms to the stream environment increased. A 2-h enrichment on a rich, nonselective medium before exposure to selective media improved the recovery of fecal coliforms with membrane filtration techniques. Substantially enhanced recoveries of E. coli from pure-culture suspensions and of fecal coliforms from raw-sewage suspensions were observed when compared with recoveries obtained by direct primary exposure to selective media. Such an enrichment period appears to provide a nontoxic environment for the gradual adjustment and repair of injured cells.

Entities:  

Year:  1977        PMID: 16345212      PMCID: PMC170730          DOI: 10.1128/aem.33.3.590-595.1977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms.

Authors:  K J Sladek; R V Suslavich; B I Sohn; F W Dawson
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-10

2.  Improved membrane filter method for fecal coliform analysis.

Authors:  R E Rose; E E Geldreich; W Litsky
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-04

3.  A comparison of the membrane filter with the most probable number method for coliform determinations from several waters.

Authors:  E L SHIPE; G M CAMERON
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1954-03

4.  Water examinations by membrane filter and most probable number procedures; report of a field study of the Standard Methods Committee for the Examination of Water and Sewage.

Authors:  P KABLER
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1954-03

5.  The membrane filter in sanitary bacteriology.

Authors:  H F CLARK; E E GELDREICH; H L JETER; P W KABLER
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1951-07-27       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Statistical analysis of the recovery of coliform organisms on Gelman and Millipore membrane filters.

Authors:  D J Schaeffer; M C Long; K G Janardan
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-10

7.  Survival of coliform bacteria in natural waters: field and laboratory studies with membrane-filter chambers.

Authors:  G A McFeters; D G Stuart
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1972-11

8.  Evaluation of coliform tests for chlorinated secondary effluents.

Authors:  S Lin
Journal:  J Water Pollut Control Fed       Date:  1973-03

9.  Influence of environmental stress on enumeration of indicator bacteria from natural waters.

Authors:  G K Bissonnette; J J Jezeski; G A McFeters; D G Stuart
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-02

10.  Evaluating the membrane fecal coliform test by using Escherichia coli as the indicator organism.

Authors:  J B Hufham
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1974-04
View more
  17 in total

1.  Detection and identification of groundwater bacteria capable of escaping entrapment on 0.45-micron-pore-size membrane filters.

Authors:  J J Shirey; G K Bissonnette
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Enchanced accuracy of coliform testing in seawater by a modification of the most-probable-number method.

Authors:  B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Automated electrical impedance technique for rapid enumeration of fecal coliforms in effluents from sewage treatment plants.

Authors:  M P Silverman; E F Munoz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems.

Authors:  N J Jacobs; W L Zeigler; F C Reed; T A Stukel; E W Rice
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Recovery of a marker strain of Escherichia coli from ozonated water by membrane filtration.

Authors:  G R Finch; M E Stiles; D W Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of nine brands of membrane filter and the most-probable-number methods for total coliform enumeration in sewage-contaminated drinking water.

Authors:  R S Tobin; P Lomax; D J Kushner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Comparison of methods of enumerating coliforms after UV disinfection.

Authors:  R G Qualls; J C Chang; S F Ossoff; J D Johnson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Rapid seven-hour fecal coliform test.

Authors:  D J Reasoner; J C Blannon; E E Geldreich
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Injury by heavy metals in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Cenci; G Morozzi; G Caldini
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration.

Authors:  J E Pagel; A A Qureshi; D M Young; L T Vlassoff
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.