Literature DB >> 389157

Australian evaluation of Autobac I with suggested interpretive and technical modifications.

G R Funnell, M D Guinness.   

Abstract

Autobac I, a recently introduced semiautomated method for rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing, has been evaluated by comparison with the calibrated dichotomous sensitivity disk diffusion technique, which is routinely used in many Australian hospitals. Only the most common clinical isolates, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella sp., and Proteus mirabilis, were included in this evaluation, and an overall interpretive agreement of 93% was obtained. However, an unusually high rate of discrepancy was noted in several organism-antibiotic combinations, in particular E. coli and P. mirabilis with ampicillin, S. aureus with penicillin, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus with methicillin, erythromycin, and clindamycin. The discrepancies associated with ampicillin have been reduced from 29 and 24% for E. coli and P. mirabilis, respectively, to less than 5% after the utilization of commercial 10-micrograms diffusion disks, in preference to the lower antibiotic content disks supplied by the Autobac manufacturer. Furthermore, modifications in the interpretive procedure have eliminated discrepancies associated with S. aureus and penicillin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 389157      PMCID: PMC352841          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.16.3.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  5 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  The CDS disc method of antibiotic sensitivity testing (calibrated dichotomous sensitivity test).

Authors:  S M Bell
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.306

3.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing by an automated system, Autobac I.

Authors:  T J Cleary; D Maurer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Evaluation of the Autobac 1 susceptibility testing system in a clinical diagnostic laboratory.

Authors:  M Mogyoros; J R Morgan; J A Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system.

Authors:  K G Stubbs; K Wicher
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.493

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.

Authors:  J B Mayo; T E Kiehn; B Wong; E M Bernard; D Armstrong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Autobac susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in an Australian hospital.

Authors:  R A Putland; M D Guinness
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by microdilution and disk elution susceptibility systems.

Authors:  J M Boyce; L S Lytle; D A Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Two-hospital study of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin by Autobac I.

Authors:  P C Harris; L B Sealey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.