Literature DB >> 6808909

Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.

J B Mayo, T E Kiehn, B Wong, E M Bernard, D Armstrong.   

Abstract

Seven Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains found to be susceptible to gentamicin by the Autobac I system and resistant by the Bauer-Kirby disk diffusion method were tested for the presence of mixed populations of cells. Double zones of inhibition randomly appeared on gentamicin disk diffusion plates, and susceptible and resistant subpopulations were isolated from these plates. Growth kinetic studies of separated strains and mixed subpopulations indicated that the susceptible organisms grew rapidly and were read as susceptible at 5 h with the Autobac I system. Resistant organisms entered a sustained lag phase and did not achieve sufficient turbidity to be read as resistant with the Autobac I system before 6 h. Thus, a false reading of susceptible could be obtained with the Autobac I system, depending on the ratio of susceptible organisms to resistant organisms selected for testing. A mixed susceptible and resistant population could be recognized by extending the incubation time of the Autobac I cuvette or by using other susceptibility methods to test isolates with light-scattering indexes of less than 1.0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6808909      PMCID: PMC181906          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.21.3.412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  6 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing by an automated system, Autobac I.

Authors:  T J Cleary; D Maurer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.

Authors:  H M Ericsson; J C Sherris
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1971

4.  Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system.

Authors:  K G Stubbs; K Wicher
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Australian evaluation of Autobac I with suggested interpretive and technical modifications.

Authors:  G R Funnell; M D Guinness
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Two-hospital study of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin by Autobac I.

Authors:  P C Harris; L B Sealey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.191

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Wide variability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa aminoglycoside results among seven susceptibility testing procedures.

Authors:  J L Staneck; S Glenn; J R DiPersio; P A Leist
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.