Literature DB >> 6569873

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by microdilution and disk elution susceptibility systems.

J M Boyce, L S Lytle, D A Walsh.   

Abstract

To determine whether methicillin-resistant (MR) Staphylococcus aureus from different geographic areas are detected reliably by various commercially available microdilution broth and disk elution systems, 73 such isolates obtained from hospitals in 13 cities were tested by a reference method (agar dilution) and by the Microscan, API 3600S, Autobac I, and MS-2 systems. Both Eugonic broth and Low Thymidine Eugonic broth were used in the evaluation of the Autobac I, and two versions of the MS-2 were used. The proportions of isolates categorized as MR by the various methods were: agar dilution method, 99%; Microscan, 100% (if the suggested cut-off of the manufacturer was used); API 3600S, 96%; Autobac I, 84 to 93%; and MS-2, 54 to 68%. With the MS-2 system, isolates from Jackson, Miss., were classified as susceptible to methicillin more often than were strains from other cities. With the Autobac I (Eugonic broth), only 55% of isolates from Houston, Tex., were classified as MR, whereas 89% of isolates from all other cities were correctly classified as MR. With the API 3600S, strains from some cities were categorized as nafcillin susceptible, whereas strains from other cities were classified as resistant to nafcillin. The results of this study suggest that future evaluations of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems should include MR strains of S. aureus from several geographic areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6569873      PMCID: PMC271519          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.20.6.1068-1075.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  48 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Sceptor microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing system: a collaborative investigation.

Authors:  R N Jones; C Thornsberry; A L Barry; T L Gavan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The antimicrobial susceptibility test: a comparison of the results of four methods.

Authors:  J E Degener; I P Thonus; M F Michel
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1981-06

3.  Laboratory evaluation of the Anderson Technical semiautomated susceptibility testing system.

Authors:  G A McKinley; D J Fagerberg; B A George
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Rapid determination of the susceptibility of bacteria to antibiotics with Sensititre plates and nitroblue tetrazolium.

Authors:  T Urban; C Jarstrand
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Examination of major disagreements in susceptibility test results by Autobac-1 and MS-2.

Authors:  N J Lindsey; W G Barnes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Evaluation of the Sensititre system for quantitative antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing: a collaborative study.

Authors:  T L Gavan; R N Jones; A L Barry
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of sensititre dried microtitration trays with a standard agar method for determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  D S Reeves; A Holt; M J Bywater; R Wise; M N Logan; J M Andrews; J M Broughall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Reliability of the MS-2 system in detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Boyce; R L White; M C Bonner; W R Lockwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing with Abbott MS-2 system.

Authors:  J R Carlson; F E Conley; D L Cahall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Two-hospital study of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin by Autobac I.

Authors:  P C Harris; L B Sealey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Expert systems in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Trevor Winstanley; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Epidemiologic factors affecting antimicrobial resistance of common bacterial isolates.

Authors:  P D Ellner; D J Fink; H C Neu; M F Parry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid detection (4 h) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a bioluminescence method.

Authors:  C H Park; D L Hixon; C M McLaughlin; J F Cook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Misclassification of susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus as methicillin-resistant S. aureus By a rapid automated susceptibility testing system.

Authors:  J Ribeiro; F D Vieira; T King; J B D'Arezzo; J M Boyce
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of MicroScan MIC panels for detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  G L Woods; P Yam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Detection of intrinsically resistant (heteroresistant) Staphylococcus aureus with the Sceptor and AutoMicrobic systems.

Authors:  S L Hansen; T J Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.