Literature DB >> 3850902

Autobac susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in an Australian hospital.

R A Putland, M D Guinness.   

Abstract

Semiautomated rapid broth elution (Autobac Multi-Test System; General Diagnostics, Div. Warner-Lambert Co., Morris Plains, N.J.) and disk diffusion tests were compared with an agar dilution breakpoint method to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of 147 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from our hospital. Although the disk diffusion method, in general, correlated well with the agar dilution tests, the overall agreement of the Autobac tests with agar dilution tests was only 79%, with many very major discrepancies occurring with clindamycin (88%), gentamicin (33%), and methicillin (15%). When we used a 10-fold higher inoculum for the Autobac tests, all isolates were shown to be resistant to methicillin, but significant numbers of major and minor discrepancies occurred with chloramphenicol, fusidic acid, and neomycin. The majority of isolates were shown to belong to three biotypes, distinguishable by lactose fermentation, lipolysis, hemolysis, and pigment production. The antibiotic susceptibility profile of one biotype was found to be markedly different from those of the other biotypes and contained a high incidence of clindamycin susceptibility and neomycin, gentamicin, and kanamycin resistance. In contrast, the other two biotypes had a high incidence of clindamycin, gentamicin, and kanamycin resistance and neomycin susceptibility and accounted for most of the very major discrepancies in the clindamycin and aminoglycoside tests. In these methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains, discrepancies possibly may arise from partial expression of methicillin resistance, dissociated or inducible clindamycin resistance, and instability of gentamicin resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3850902      PMCID: PMC268535          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.22.5.822-827.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  28 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  [Staphylococcus strains naturally resistant to methicillin and 5-methyl-3-phenyl-4-iso-oxazolyl-penicillin].

Authors:  Y A CHABBERT; J G BAUDENS
Journal:  Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris)       Date:  1962-08

3.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing by an automated system, Autobac I.

Authors:  T J Cleary; D Maurer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Studies on recently isolated cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R W Lacey; A Stokes
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1979-10

5.  Further observations on methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  P M Rountree; A M Vickery
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1973-05-26       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method.

Authors:  A W Bauer; W M Kirby; J C Sherris; M Turck
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  The role of an isolation unit in the control of hospital infection with methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  J B Selkon; E R Stokes; H R Ingham
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Detection of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci by the AutoMicrobic system.

Authors:  R W Stotler; M C Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing with Abbott MS-2 system.

Authors:  J R Carlson; F E Conley; D L Cahall
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Vancomycin treatment of bacteremia caused by oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison with beta-lactam antibiotic treatment of bacteremia caused by oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D E Craven; N R Kollisch; C R Hsieh; M G Connolly; W R McCabe
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci: detection methods and treatment of infections.

Authors:  C J Hackbarth; H F Chambers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Rapid detection (4 h) of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a bioluminescence method.

Authors:  C H Park; D L Hixon; C M McLaughlin; J F Cook
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  H F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin- and gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P Maple; J Hamilton-Miller; W Brumfitt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Nosocomial propagation of multiresistant Staphylococcus aureus: an analysis using biotyping and drug sensitivity.

Authors:  J Yoshida; T Nagata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.