Literature DB >> 602916

Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system.

K G Stubbs, K Wicher.   

Abstract

A newly introduced automated method for antibiotic susceptibility testing, AUTOBAC 1, has been evaluated by comparison with the disk agar diffusion method (Bauer-Kirby). A total of 2,518 strains of gram-positive (540) and gram-negative (1,978) organisms isolated from clinical specimens was examined by both methods with eight or ten antibiotics, including Tobramycin. An overall agreement of 97.4% was obtained when results were compared by individual antibiotic. However, many discrepancies were observed when individual genera or species were analyzed. Of 2,518 strains examined, 651 (26%) showed discrepancies in response to one or more antibiotics. Strains, showing discrepancies were re-examined by the broth dilution susceptibility method. The results obtained favored the disk agar diffusion method. Reproducibility experiments revealed a greater inconsistency in the AUTOBAC 1 system than in the agar diffusion test. It is concluded that although a rapid automated system for antibiotic sensitivity testing is desirable, the conventional disk agar diffusion method is easier to perform, more reliable, and a less expensive procedure for antibiotic sensitivity determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 602916     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/68.6.769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  9 in total

1.  Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative clinical isolates with the AutoMicrobic system.

Authors:  B A Backes; S J Cavalieri; J T Rudrik; E M Britt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Examination of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-gentamicin discrepancies encountered in an Autobac I-disk diffusion comparison.

Authors:  J B Mayo; T E Kiehn; B Wong; E M Bernard; D Armstrong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Apparent colistin-related false sensitivity with the Autobac I system.

Authors:  L Duckenfield; M Wadke; J K Ashton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical impact of rapid identification and susceptibility testing of bacterial blood culture isolates.

Authors:  G M Trenholme; R L Kaplan; P H Karakusis; T Stine; J Fuhrer; W Landau; S Levin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  T L Overman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Rate of penicillin killing of Staphylococcus aureus and Autobac 1 susceptibility test results.

Authors:  J A Harris; D Furtado
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by microdilution and disk elution susceptibility systems.

Authors:  J M Boyce; L S Lytle; D A Walsh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Australian evaluation of Autobac I with suggested interpretive and technical modifications.

Authors:  G R Funnell; M D Guinness
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Two-hospital study of Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility to penicillin and ampicillin by Autobac I.

Authors:  P C Harris; L B Sealey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.