Literature DB >> 10502874

Frequency of meaning use for ambiguous and unambiguous words.

Z M Griffin1.   

Abstract

When using verbal stimuli, researchers usually equate words on frequency of use. However, for some ambiguous words (e.g., ball as a round object or a formal dance), frequency counts fail to distinguish how often a particular meaning is used. This study evaluates the use of ratings to estimate meaning frequency. Analyses show that ratings correlate highly with word frequency counts when orthographic and meaning frequencies should converge, are not unduly influenced by semantic factors, and may provide a better measure of relative meaning dominance than the word association task does. Furthermore, the ratings allow researchers to equate or manipulate frequency of meaning use for ambiguous and unambiguous words. Ratings for 211 words are reported.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10502874      PMCID: PMC5845774          DOI: 10.3758/bf03200731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  13 in total

1.  Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon.

Authors:  J C Cutting; V S Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Inaccuracies in the semantic count of Lorge and Thorndike.

Authors:  M R ROSENZWEIG; D McNEILL
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-06

3.  On the interpretation of word frequency as a variable affecting speed of recognition.

Authors:  D HOWES
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-08

4.  Perceived frequency of concrete and abstract words.

Authors:  R C Galbraith; B J Underwood
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-03

5.  Summation of activation: evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory.

Authors:  D A Balota; S T Paul
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

7.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

8.  Response latencies in naming objects.

Authors:  R C Oldfield; A Wingfield
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs.

Authors:  L C Twilley; P Dixon; D Taylor; K Clark
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-01

10.  Norms as a tool for the study of homography.

Authors:  D S Gorfein; J M Viviani; J Leddo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Listening to Puns Elicits the Co-Activation of Alternative Homophone Meanings during Language Production.

Authors:  Sebastian Benjamin Rose; Katharina Spalek; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.