Literature DB >> 11848610

Lexical guidance in sentence processing: a note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998).

R P van Gompel1, M J Pickering.   

Abstract

Mitchell (1987) conducted a self-paced reading experiment that showed that people experienced difficulty reading a noun phrase when it immediately followed an intransitive verb. From this, he argued for a two-stage theory of parsing, in which verb subcategorization information is initially ignored. In response, Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998) found no evidence to support this claim in an eye-tracking experiment and argued that Mitchell's segmentation procedure distorted the parsing process. We report an eye-tracking experiment, in which materials similar to those in Adams et al., but with longer noun phrases, were used, that showed a pattern of difficulty similar to Mitchell's findings. Hence, Mitchell's results did not depend on the use of an artificial method of presentation. The results cast further doubt on the adequacy of constraint-based accounts of parsing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11848610     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; G Kambe; S A Duffy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

2.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

3.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution [corrected].

Authors:  M C MacDonald; N J Pearlmutter; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

2.  Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2005-01

3.  The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Givenness, complexity, and the Danish dative alternation.

Authors:  Johannes Kizach; Laura Winther Balling
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

5.  Priming of Early Closure: Evidence for the Lexical Boost during Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  The Comprehension of Syntactic and Affective Prosody by Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Cognitive Deficits.

Authors:  Maria Martzoukou; Despina Papadopoulou; Mary-Helen Kosmidis
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2017-12

7.  Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Liv J Hoversten; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2021-04-08

8.  Verb Transitivity Bias Affects On-line Sentence Reading in People with Aphasia.

Authors:  Gayle Dede
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.773

9.  Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Gayle Dede
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-08

10.  Structure before meaning: sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization.

Authors:  Johannes Kizach; Anne Mette Nyvad; Ken Ramshøj Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.