Literature DB >> 11126934

Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.

A R Schmauder1, R K Morris, D V Poynor.   

Abstract

The results of two experiments comparing processing of function words and content words are reported. In Experiment 1, priming was present for both related function and related content word pairs, as measured in lexical decision response times. In Experiment 2, participants' eye movements were monitored as they read sentences containing either a high- or a low-frequency function or content target word. Average word length and word frequency were matched across the function and content word conditions. Function words showed frequency effects in first-fixation and gaze duration that were similar to those seen for content words. Clear differences in on-line processing of function and content words emerged in later processing measures. These differences were reflected in reading patterns and reading time measures. There was inflated processing time in the phrase immediately following a low-frequency function word, and participants made more regressions to the target word in this condition than in the other three conditions. The priming effects in lexical decision and the word frequency effects in initial processing measures in silent reading for both word types were taken as evidence of common lexical processing for function and content words. The observed differences in later processing measures in the eye-movement data were taken as evidence of differences in the role that the two word types have in sentence processing beyond the lexical level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11126934     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  32 in total

1.  Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material.

Authors:  G A MILLER; J A SELFRIDGE
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-04

2.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

3.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The modality-specific organization of grammatical categories: evidence from impaired spoken and written sentence production.

Authors:  B Rapp; A Caramazza
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition.

Authors:  F Grosjean; J P Gee
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

6.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

7.  Errors in proofreading: evidence for syntactic control of letter processing?

Authors:  S Abramovici
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-05

8.  Levels of processing and vocabulary types: evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-03

9.  Speech timing of grammatical categories.

Authors:  J M Sorensen; W E Cooper; J M Paccia
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1978-06

10.  Lexical access and frequency sensitivity: frequency saturation and open/closed class equivalence.

Authors:  B Gordon; A Caramazza
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Letter detection in very familiar texts.

Authors:  S N Greenberg; J Tai
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

2.  The GO model: a reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Alice F Healy; Asher Koriat; Hamutal Kreiner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

3.  The impact of letter detection on eye movement patterns during reading: Reconsidering lexical analysis in connected text as a function of task.

Authors:  Seth N Greenberg; Albrecht W Inhoff; Ulrich W Weger
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Nomen est omen: Investigating the dominance of nouns in word comprehension with eye movement analyses.

Authors:  Marco R Furtner; John F Rauthmann; Pierre Sachse
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-12-23

5.  The representation of plural inflectional affixes in English: Evidence from priming in an auditory lexical decision task.

Authors:  Amy Goodwin Davies; David Embick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.331

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.