Literature DB >> 20000939

Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Bom Jun Kwon1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine cochlear implant (CI) users' perceptual segregation of speech from background noise with differing degrees of electrode separation between speech and noise. Eleven users of the nucleus CI system were tested on consonant identification using an experimental processing scheme called "multi-stream processing" in which speech and noise stimuli were processed separately and interleaved. Speech was presented to either ten (every other electrode) or six electrodes (every fourth electrode). Noise was routed to either the same (the "overlapped" condition) or a different set of electrodes (the "interlaced" condition), where speech and noise electrodes were separated by one- and two-electrode spacings for ten- and six-electrode presentations, respectively. Results indicated a small but significant improvement in consonant recognition (5%-10%) in the interlaced condition with a two-electrode spacing (approximately 1.1 mm) in two subjects. It appears that the results were influenced by peripheral channel interactions, partially accounting for individual variability. Although the overall effect was small and observed from a small number of subjects, the present study demonstrated that CI users' performance on segregating the target from the background might be improved if these sounds were presented with sufficient peripheral separation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20000939      PMCID: PMC2803724          DOI: 10.1121/1.3257200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Recognition of spectrally asynchronous speech by normal-hearing listeners and Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Q J Fu; J J Galvin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Qian-Jie Fu; John Galvin
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  2004-05

5.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng; Ruth Litovsky; Peter Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Simulations of cochlear implant hearing using filtered harmonic complexes: implications for concurrent sound segregation.

Authors:  John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Luc Geurts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Using blind source separation techniques to improve speech recognition in bilateral cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Kostas Kokkinakis; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition in background noise of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Bruce L Fetterman; Elizabeth H Domico
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.497

10.  Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.

Authors:  D K Eddington; W H Dobelle; D E Brackmann; M G Mladejovsky; J L Parkin
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.