Literature DB >> 27603264

Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss.

Daniel Fogerty1, Jayne B Ahlstrom2, William J Bologna3, Judy R Dubno2.   

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated how listeners process acoustic cues preserved during sentences interrupted by nonsimultaneous noise that was amplitude modulated by a competing talker. Method: Younger adults with normal hearing and older adults with normal or impaired hearing listened to sentences with consonants or vowels replaced with noise amplitude modulated by a competing talker. Sentences were spectrally shaped according to individual audiograms or to the mean audiogram from the listeners with hearing impairment for a younger spectrally shaped control group. The modulation spectrum of the noise was low-pass filtered at different modulation cutoff frequencies. The effect of noise level was also examined.
Results: Performance declined when nonsimultaneous masker modulation included faster rates and was maximized when masker modulation matched the preserved primary speech modulation. Vowels resulted in better performance compared with consonants at slower modulation cutoff rates, likely due to suprasegmental features. Poorer overall performance was observed with increased age or hearing loss, and for listeners who received spectrally shaped speech. Conclusions: Nonsimultaneous amplitude modulations from a competing talker significantly interacted with the preserved speech segment, and additional listener factors were observed for age and hearing loss. Importantly, listeners may obtain benefit from nonsimultaneous competing modulations when they match the preserved modulations of the sentence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27603264      PMCID: PMC5345559          DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  35 in total

1.  Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Staci E Irish
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Forward masking of amplitude modulation: basic characteristics.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; S Theo Goverts; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Understanding the speech-understanding problems of older adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.

Authors:  Michel R Benard; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Multiple phonemic restorations follow the rules for auditory induction.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-08

8.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech.

Authors:  T Baer; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Diane Kewley-Port; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; William J Bologna; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Glimpsing speech interrupted by speech-modulated noise.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Bobby E Gibbs; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; William J Bologna; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Rachel Madorskiy; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.297

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.