| Literature DB >> 35887073 |
Andreea Campu1, Ilinca Muresan1, Ana-Maria Craciun1, Simona Cainap2,3, Simion Astilean1,4, Monica Focsan1.
Abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is considered as one of the main causes of death, threating human lives for decades. Currently, its diagnosis relies on electrocardiography (ECG), which has been proven to be insufficient. In this context, the efficient detection of cardiac biomarkers was proposed to overcome the limitations of ECG. In particular, the measurement of troponins, specifically cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT), has proven to be superior in terms of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of myocardial damage. As one of the most life-threatening conditions, specific and sensitive investigation methods that are fast, universally available, and cost-efficient to allow for early initiation of evidence-based, living-saving treatment are desired. In this review, we aim to present and discuss the major breakthroughs made in the development of cTnI and cTnT specific biosensor designs and analytical tools, highlighting the achieved progress as well as the remaining challenges to reach the technological goal of simple, specific, cheap, and portable testing chips for the rapid and efficient on-site detection of cardiac cTnI/cTnT biomarkers in order to diagnose and treat cardiovascular diseases at an incipient stage.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac troponin biomarkers; electrochemical detection; fluorescence detection; surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy; surface plasmon resonance
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887073 PMCID: PMC9318943 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1A schematic illustration of the SPR analysis principle for the cTnI biomarker detection (a), dopamine MIP and NIP for the specific capture and detection of cTnT (b), and direct and sandwich assay methods for the detection of cTnT using AuNPs (c). Figure adapted from references [19,20,22].
Figure 2(a) The absorption spectra of the TMB2+ in the presence of different cTnT concentrations (from 2 to 320 pg/mL). A digital image of the ELISA plate is shown in the inset. (b) Plot of the SERS signal intensity against the cTnT concentration. The inset presents a zoom of the 0 to 8 pg/mL cTnT concentration range. Figure adapted from Yu et al. [35].
Figure 3The schematic illustration of the (a) gold-patterned chip and SERS probes and (b) sandwich structure of the SERS immunoassay. (c) The SERS spectra recorded for increasing concentrations of cTnI ranging from 0 to 100 ng/mL and (d) the calibration curve of the 1615 cm−1 SERS band intensity as a function of the cTnI concentration on a logarithmic scale. Figure adapted from Cheng et al. [40].
Figure 4(a) The schematic illustration of the lateral flow assay for the detection of cardiac biomarkers on a single T-line. Figure adapted from Zhang et al. [51]. (b) Digital images of the paper-based fluidic platforms and (c) SERRS spectra from the test lines after the capture of different concentrations of cTnI via MGITC monitoring. Figure adapted from Tu et al. [52].
Figure 5(a) The schematic illustration of the design of the LFIA (left) and digital images of negative and positive tests under UV-light (right). Figure adapted from Cai et al. [60]. (b) The schematic illustration and digital image of the design of the proposed microfluidic-based chip. Figure adapted from Huang et al. [64].
Figure 6(a) The preparation of the secondary antibody composites and the fabrication of the immunosensor for dual detection. (b) Linearity curve between the ECL intensities and the logarithm of cTnI concentrations. (c) The ECL responses of the biosensor to interfering substances and the cTnI–BNP mix solution. Figure adapted from Zhao et al. [80].
Figure 7The schematic illustration of the fabricated ETC biosensor composed of a multifunctional DNA structure on the Au nanospike. Figure adapted from Lee et al. [89].
Summary of all presented biosensors highlighting their strengths and limitations.
| Detection Method | Target | Sensor | Signal | LOD | Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Fiber-optic-based sensors | Au thin film | 1.4 ng/mL [ | Long-term | Sensitivity |
| Au chips | Au thin film | 68 pg/mL [ | ||||
| Immunoassay | HAuNPs | 38 ng/mL [ | ||||
| AuNRs | 10 ng/mL [ | |||||
| AuNRs aggregation | 0.4 ng/mL [ | |||||
| Magnetic-field | HAuNPs-functionalized Au thin film and magnetic | 1.25 ng/mL [ | ||||
| AuNPs-functionalized Au thin film and core-shell Fe3O4@PDA nanohybrids | 3.75 ng/mL [ | |||||
|
| Au sensors | Molecularly imprinted | 14.8 nM [ | |||
| Self-assembled monolayer of conjugated polymers | 100 ng/mL [ | |||||
| AuNPs | 0.5 ng/mL [ | |||||
|
|
| Magnetic-field | Graphene oxide-conjugated AuNPs and magnetic beads | 5 pg/mL [ | Specificity, | Fluorescence masked signal, |
| Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles and magnetic beads | 4.4 pg/mL, | |||||
| Nanostructured sensing platform | Au-patterned array chip with Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles | 8.9 pg/mL [ | ||||
| Aptasensors | Au nanoplate | 2.4 fg/mL [ | ||||
| Flower shaped Ag and Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles | 10 ng/mL [ | |||||
| Lateral Flow | Au, Au-Ag, Au@Ag core-shell and rattle-like Au@Ag | 90 pg/mL, | ||||
| Aptamer-conjugated Au@Ag core-shell nanoparticles | 16 pg/mL [ | |||||
| GERTs | 0.1 ng/mL [ | |||||
|
| Enzymatic | AuNPs colloidal solution | 2 pg/mL [ | |||
| Microfluidic | AuNPs, AgNPs, and Au nanourchins | 1 pg/mL [ | ||||
|
|
| Fluoro-microbead guiding chip | Imprinted Au patterns and fluoro-microbeads | 1.4 pM [ | Fast, | Sensitivity |
| Lateral Flow | Double layered fluorescent | 16 pg/mL [ | ||||
| Quantum dots beads | 36 pg/mL [ | |||||
| Immunosensor | Fluorophore-conjugated | 2 pg/mL, | ||||
| Nanozyme-linked immunosorbent | Quantum dots | 0.413 pg/mL [ | ||||
| Microfluidic sensor | Fluorescent microspheres | 5 pg/mL [ | ||||
| FRET biosensor | Protein-based complexes | 27 nM [ | ||||
| Quantum dots | 32 nM [ | |||||
| SPCE | Bimetallic Au-Ag thin films | 21.2 ag/mL [ | ||||
|
| FRET biosensor | Protein-based complexes | 27 nM [ | |||
| Carbon dots | 0.12 ng/mL [ | |||||
|
|
| ETC biosensor | carbon paste electrode and | 0.8 ng/mL [ | Integrates various technologies, | Electrode |
| Screen printed electrode | 0.2 ng/mL [ | |||||
| Graphene oxide | 0.05 ng/mL [ | |||||
| Indium tin oxide–glass | 1 ng/mL [ | |||||
| ETC | Quantum dots and PDMS–AuNP composite | 5 amol/30 µL [ | ||||
| Enzymatic | Indium tin oxide electrode functionalized with AuNPs | 1 ng/mL [ | ||||
| ECL | Electrode modified with AuNRs and AuNPs | 2 pg/mL [ | ||||
| AuNPs and ECL | 3.2 pg/mL [ | |||||
| Photoelectrochemical immunoassay | Ag2S/ZnO nanocomposites as photoelectrodes | 3 fg/mL [ | ||||
| Peptisensor | Glassy carbon electrode functionalized with AuNPs | 3 pg/mL [ | ||||
| Triangular icicle-like Au nanostructure deposited on Au electrode | 0.9 pg/mL [ | |||||
| Aptasensors | Au nanodumbbells and Au electrode | 8 pg/mL [ | ||||
| Screen printed carbon | 24 pg/mL [ | |||||
| Mos2 nanoconjugates; core-shell Au@sio2@Au | 0.95 pM [ | |||||
| Hybrid Cu@AuNPs | 16 pg/mL [ | |||||
| Au nanospike over Au | 1 pM [ | |||||
| 5 nm AuNPs | 0.75 fg/mL [ |