| Literature DB >> 35884813 |
Balazs Szabo1, Balazs Gasz2, Laszlo Adam Fazekas1, Adam Varga1, Levente Kiss-Papai2, Orsolya Matolay3, Zsofia Rezsabek1, Mohammad W Al-Smadi1, Norbert Nemeth1.
Abstract
Vascular graft maturation is associated with blood flow characteristics, such as velocity, pressure, vorticity, and wall shear stress (WSS). Many studies examined these factors separately. We aimed to examine the remodeling of arterio-venous fistulas (AVFs) and loop-shaped venous interposition grafts, together with 3D flow simulation. Thirty male Wistar rats were randomly and equally divided into sham-operated, AVF, and loop-shaped venous graft (Loop) groups, using the femoral and superficial inferior epigastric vessels for anastomoses. Five weeks after surgery, the vessels were removed for histological evaluation, or plastic castings were made and scanned for 3D flow simulation. Remodeling of AVF and looped grafts was complete in 5 weeks. Histology showed heterogeneous morphology depending on the distribution of intraluminal pressure and WSS. In the Loop group, an asymmetrical WSS distribution coincided with the intima hyperplasia spots. The tunica media was enlarged only when both pressure and WSS were high. The 3D flow simulation correlated with the histological findings, identifying "hotspots" for intimal hyperplasia formation, suggesting a predictive value. These observations can be useful for microvascular research and for quality control in microsurgical training.Entities:
Keywords: 3D flow simulation; arterio-venous fistula; flow characteristics; histology; interposition venous graft; intimal hyperplasia; vascular graft; vascular regeneration; wall shear stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35884813 PMCID: PMC9313372 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Photos of the vessels and the operation. (A) The dissected vessels. The top arrow shows the femoral artery, while the bottom arrow points to the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV). (B) The finished arterio-venous fistula. The arrow shows the end-to-side anastomosis between the femoral artery and the SIEV. (C) The loop-shaped SIEV graft interpositioned into the femoral artery. The arrow points to the proximal anastomosis. Magnification: 10×.
Figure 2Main steps of the plastic casting process. (A) The graft was injected with the plastic from the right common iliac artery. (B) The plastic casting with the tissue removed. (C) The digitalized 3D vessel model. Magnification: 4×, 10×.
Figure 3Schematic graphs of the AVF (A) and the loop (B) models showing the locations of the WSS and pressure measurements from the 3D flow simulation data.
Outer diameter (O.D.) values at various locations (mm), length (mm) and shape, as ratio (dimensionless) of vertical (V) and horizontal (H) axes of the loop-shaped fistulas or interpositioned grafts in the AVF and Loop groups just after the operation and in the fifth postoperative (p.o.) week.
| Group | Time | O.D. at the Proximal Anastomosis | O.D. at the Curvature | O.D. at the Distal Anastomosis | Graft Length | H/V Loop Axis Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF | Operation | 0.99 ± 0.11 | 1.25 ± 0.25 | 1.12 ± 0.25 | 18.35 ± 2.5 | 0.74 ± 0.08 |
| 5th p.o. week | 1.40 ± 0.22 | 3.04 ± 0.71 | 2.67 ± 0.55 | 25.08 ± 3.21 | 1.16 ± 0.42 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Loop | Operation | 1.05 ± 0.08 | 1.38 ± 0.09 | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 19.04 ± 1.4 | 1.03 ± 0.09 |
| 5th p.o. week | 1.03 ± 0.1 | 1.37 ± 0.17 | 1.19 ± 0.09 | 16.13 ± 2.03 | 0.56 ± 0.15 | |
| 0.759 | 0.921 |
|
|
|
Values are means ± SD.
Figure 4Numerical data of the histological results. (A) Comparison of the tissue layers (tunica intima and tunica media) between the groups. (B) Comparison of the tissue layers at the proximal and distal ends in the loop. (C) Comparison of the upper and lower walls at the AVF anastomosis site. (D) Diameter of the AVF at the proximal and distal area. Means ± SEM, n = 10; * p < 0.05 vs. Sham; ^ p < 0.05 vs. proximal end, # p< 0.05 vs. upper wall.
Figure 5The junction site of the superficial inferior epigastric vein and the femoral vein—comparison of the flow simulation and the histology using a representative figure. (A) Flow simulation image of a fresh arterio-venous fistula. The arrow points to the vessel junction. (B) A 3D model of the vessels. The red lines show the plane where the tissue samples were sliced for histology. The black lines V (vertical) and H (horizontal) were used to evaluate the shape change of the fistula. The thick red line is represented in image (C). This is the venous junction of the superficial inferior epigastric vein and the femoral vein. (C,D) Histological slides of the superficial inferior epigastric vein–femoral vein junction. The upper arrow shows the superficial inferior epigastric vein, while the lower arrow shows the intimal hyperplasia formation in the femoral vein. Magnification: 50×.
Figure 6The loop—comparison of the flow simulation and the histology results using a representative figure. (A) Wall shear stress simulation of a freshly performed loop. The left arrow shows the distal anastomosis location, while the right arrow points to the area of the proximal anastomosis. (B) A 3D model of the loop. The red lines shows where the tissue samples were sliced for histology. The black lines V (vertical) and H (horizontal) were used to evaluate the shape change of the loop. (C,D) Longitudinal histological slide of the distal and the proximal anastomosis. The red line follows the internal elastic membrane. The arrows show the stitches at the arterio-venous junction. Magnification: 50×, 70×.
The 3D flow simulation data (wall shear stress (Pa) and pressure (mmHg)) at various sites of the loop-shaped fistulas or interpositioned grafts in the AVF and Loop groups. The 3D flow simulation was performed on the vessel molds taken and prepared in the fifth postoperative week.
| Group | Localization | Site | Wall Shear Stress (Pa) | Pressure (mmHg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVF | Artery, proximally to the anastomoses | (a) | 24.61 ± 2.72 + | 21.39 ± 2.92 + |
| Artery, distally to the anastomoses | (b) | 3.63 ± 0.49 *+ | 20.89 ± 3.23 + | |
| Arterio-venous anastomosis | Upper (c) | 40.74 ± 8.95 *+ | 17.01 ± 1.8 *+ | |
| Lower (d) | 4.16 ± 1.92 *+ | 18.3 ± 1.85 *+ | ||
| Vein graft, proximal branch first mm | Upper (e) | 41.04 ± 12.4 *+ | 15.5 ± 1.71 *+ | |
| Lower (f) | 6.23 ± 4.17 *+ | 15.6 ± 2.03 *+ | ||
| Vein graft, middle (curvature) | Convex (g) | 6.34 ± 1.02 *+ | 13.13 ± 1.19 *+ | |
| Concave (h) | 3.8 ± 0.55 *+# | 13.06 ± 1.13 *+ | ||
| Venous junction (f) | SIEV (i) | 0.28 ± 0.09 *+ | 12.33 ± 0.27 * | |
| Opposite (j) | 2.28 ± 0.68 *+ | 12.46 ± 0.56 * | ||
| Vein, proximally to the anastomoses | (k) | 0.49 ± 0.14 * | 12.34 ± 0.22 * | |
| Vein, distally to the anastomoses | (l) | 0.35 ± 0.13 *+ | 12.2 ± 0.12 * | |
| Loop | Artery, proximally to the anastomoses | (a) | 0.99 ± 0.13 | 57.89 ± 0.54 |
| Vein graft, proximal branch | Convex (b) | 0.75 ± 0.27 * | 57.98 ± 0.31 | |
| Concave (c) | 0.53 ± 0.06 *# | 58.06 ± 0.26 | ||
| Vein graft, middle (curvature) | Convex (d) | 0.23 ± 0.03 * | 58.12 ± 0.21 | |
| Concave (e) | 0.18 ± 0.05 *# | 58.12 ± 0.2 | ||
| Vein graft, distal branch | Convex (f) | 0.3 ± 0.03 * | 58.19 ± 0.13 | |
| Concave (g) | 0.31 ± 0.04 * | 58.2 ± 0.15 | ||
| Artery, distally to the anastomoses | (h) | 0.72 ± 0.17 * | 58.22 ± 0.13 |
Values are means ± SD. * p < 0.05 vs. artery proximally to the anastomoses, # p < 0.05 vs. convex side of the bent graft, + p < 0.05 vs. vein proximally to the anastomoses, × p < 0.05 vs. SIEV/upper.