| Literature DB >> 32010041 |
Zimo Chen1,2, Haiqiang Qin1,2,3,4, Jia Liu5, Bokai Wu5, Zaiheng Cheng5, Yong Jiang1,2,3,4, Liping Liu1,2,3,4, Lina Jing6, Xinyi Leng7, Jing Jing1,2,3,4, Yilong Wang1,2,3,4, Yongjun Wang1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Background: Although wall shear stress (WSS) and pressure play important roles in plaque vulnerability, characteristics of the two indices in intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) have not been fully investigated yet. This study aimed to elucidate this issue by means of establishing a non-invasive computational fluid dynamics method with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) of the whole cerebral artery. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: cerebral hemodynamics; intracranial atherosclerosis; magnetic resonance angiography; mathematical modeling; pressure; wall shear stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 32010041 PMCID: PMC6978719 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1The results of a typical hemodynamic simulation. The five defined points of the prominent side are shown. Panels (A) and (B), respectively, show the results of WSS and pressure contour maps. Subfigures (a) and (b) show an area of 34.3% luminal stenosis in the right MCA M1 segment. We chose the posterior wall of the MCA as the prominent side of the lesion for measurement. The WSSmax was located at the upper half of upstream section, and the magnitude was 7.47 pa. The WSSmin was located at the downstream section, and the magnitude was 0.33 pa. The pressure ratio(termianl/origin) was 0.99. MCA, middle cerebral artery; WSS, wall shear stress; WSSmax, the maximum value of WSS; WSSmin, the minimum value of WSS; pressureterminal, the value of pressure at the terminal point; pressureorigin, the value of pressure at the origin point.
Distribution of specific indices at defined points and sections (p-values for the results of chi-square test indicate whether the most common location of the total distribution becomes significantly different after grouping).
| WSSmax | Apex | 29 (52.7%) | 14 (58.3%) | 15 (48.4%) | 0.464 |
| Mup-to-apex | 22 (40.0%) | 9 (37.5%) | 13 (41.9%) | ||
| Mdown | 3 (5.5%) | 1 (4.2%) | 2 (6.5%) | ||
| Origin | 1 (1.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.2%) | ||
| WSSmin | Downstream | 21 (38.2%) | 9 (37.5%) | 12 (38.7%) | 0.927 |
| Terminal | 20 (36.4%) | 10 (41.7%) | 10 (32.3%) | ||
| Origin | 11 (20.0%) | 5 (20.8%) | 6 (19.4%) | ||
| Upstream | 3 (5.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (9.6%) | ||
| Pressuremax | Origin | 37 (67.3%) | 17 (70.8%) | 20 (64.5%) | 0.620 |
| Origin-to-Mup | 15 (27.3%) | 7 (29.2%) | 8 (25.8%) | ||
| Apex | 1 (1.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.2%) | ||
| Downstream | 1 (1.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.2%) | ||
| Terminal | 1 (1.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.2%) | ||
| Pressuremin | Downstream | 39 (70.9%) | 16 (66.7%) | 23 (74.2%) | 0.542 |
| Terminal | 14 (25.5%) | 8 (33.3%) | 6 (19.4%) | ||
| Origin | 2 (3.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (6.4%) | ||
WSS, wall shear stress; WSS.
Results of Spearman's rank correlation between indices of hemodynamic forces and percent stenosis.
| WSS ratio(max/origin) | <50% | 2.61 (1.91, 3.20) | < 0.001 | 0.598 |
| ≥50% | 4.86 (3.86, 7.94) | < 0.001 | 0.779 | |
| Pressure ratio(terminal/origin) | <50% | 0.99 (0.96, 0.995) | 0.003 | −0.522 |
| ≥50% | 0.81 (0.53, 0.91) | < 0.001 | −0.747 | |
| WSS ratio(min/origin) | — | 0.47 (0.66, 0.87) | 0.651 | 0.063 |
WSS, wall shear stress; WSS.
Figure 2The scatterplots of correlations between indices of hemodynamic forces and percent stenosis. (A) Correlation between the WSS ratio(max/origin) and percent stenosis. (B) Correlation between the pressure ratio(terminal/origin) and percent stenosis. (C) Correlation between the WSS ratio(min/origin) and percent stenosis. WSS, wall shear stress; WSSmax, the maximum value of WSS; WSSmin, the minimum value of WSS; WSSorigin, the value of WSS at the origin point; pressureterminal, the value of pressure at the terminal point; pressureorigin, the value of pressure at the origin point.
Figure 3The magnitude and distribution of WSS and pressure varying with different stenosis severity. Panels (A) and (B), respectively, show the results of WSS and pressure contour maps. Percent stenosis values of subfigures subfigures (a) and (b) were 47.1, 56.3, and 70.0%, respectively. WSS, wall shear stress.
Figure 4The scatterplots of correlations between indices of hemodynamic forces. (A) Correlation between WSSmax and pressure ratio(terminal/origin). (B) Correlation between WSSmax and pressure drop(origin-. WSS, wall shear stress; WSSmax, the maximum value of WSS; pressureterminal, the value of pressure at the terminal point; pressureorigin, the value of pressure at the origin point.