Literature DB >> 28738446

Single-stage versus two-stage arteriovenous loop microsurgical reconstruction: A meta-analysis of the literature.

Rebecca Knackstedt1, Rachel Aliotta1, James Gatherwright1, Risal Djohan1, Brian Gastman1, Graham Schwarz1, Mark Hendrickson1, Raffi Gurunluoglu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous (AV) loops can be utilized in a single- or two-stage approach in free flap reconstruction when proper vessels are not available. However, there exists no consensus on which method leads to superior microsurgical and patient outcomes. The purpose of this article was to review single- versus two-stage AV loops utilized in free flap reconstruction with a focus on complications and overall outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic review of AV loops for autologous free tissue transfer was conducted. Endpoints investigated included flap characteristics, timing to second stage, complications, and outcomes. A Student's t-test and forest plots were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Thirty-five unique papers discussed utilizing AV loops in a single- or two-stage approach, yielding 260 and 98 single- and two-stage AV loops, respectively. There was a statistically significant higher rate of major complications in two-stage as compared to single-stage AV loops. There was a non-statistically significant difference in rate of minor complications in the single-stage as compared to two-stage AV loops. Overall, there was a statistically significant higher success rate in the single-stage as compared to two-stage AV loops
CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant higher rate of major complications and failures in two-stage AV loops. As well-conducted randomized controlled studies are nearly impossible to perform in this population, the decision to pursue a single- versus two-stage reconstruction should ultimately be determined based on individual patient co-morbidities, the size and etiology of defect, and the type of free tissue transfer planned.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28738446     DOI: 10.1002/micr.30204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  4 in total

Review 1.  Vein Grafts in Free Flap Reconstruction: Review of Indications and Institutional Pearls.

Authors:  Hannah C Langdell; Ronnie L Shammas; Andrew Atia; Edward I Chang; Evan Matros; Brett T Phillips
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Arteriovenous Loops Enable Free Tissue Transfer With Otherwise Inadequate Local Donor and Recipient Vessels.

Authors:  Mathias Tremp; Carlo M Oranges; Thomas Wolff; Marina Barandun; Ilario Fulco; Henrik Eckardt; Dirk J Schaefer; Daniel F Kalbermatten
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Efficacy of the Arteriovenous Loop for Free Flap Reconstruction in Patients with Complex Limb Trauma: Case Series and Literature Review.

Authors:  Andrea Marchesini; Letizia Senesi; Francesco De Francesco; Pier Paolo Pangrazi; Andrea Campodonico; Rocco Politano; Michele Riccio
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Heterogeneous Maturation of Arterio-Venous Fistulas and Loop-Shaped Venous Interposition Grafts: A Histological and 3D Flow Simulation Comparison.

Authors:  Balazs Szabo; Balazs Gasz; Laszlo Adam Fazekas; Adam Varga; Levente Kiss-Papai; Orsolya Matolay; Zsofia Rezsabek; Mohammad W Al-Smadi; Norbert Nemeth
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.