Literature DB >> 12742998

Augmentation of wall shear stress inhibits neointimal hyperplasia after stent implantation: inhibition through reduction of inflammation?

Stéphane G Carlier1, Luc C A van Damme, Casper P Blommerde, Jolanda J Wentzel, Glenn van Langehove, Stephan Verheye, Mark M Kockx, Michiel W M Knaapen, Caroline Cheng, Frank Gijsen, Dirk J Duncker, Nikos Stergiopulos, Cornelis J Slager, Patrick W Serruys, Rob Krams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low wall shear stress (WSS) increases neointimal hyperplasia (NH) in vein grafts and stents. We studied the causal relationship between WSS and NH formation in stents by locally increasing WSS with a flow divider (Anti-Restenotic Diffuser, Endoart SA) placed in the center of the stent. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 9 rabbits fed a high-cholesterol diet for 2 months to induce endothelial dysfunction, 18 stents were implanted in the right and left external iliac arteries (1 stent per vessel). Lumen diameters were measured by quantitative angiography before and after implantation and at 4-week follow-up, at which time, macrophage accumulation and interruption of the internal elastic lamina was determined. Cross sections of stent segments within the ARED (S+ARED), outside the ARED (S[minus]ARED), and in corresponding segments of the contralateral control stent (SCTRL) were analyzed. Changes in WSS induced by the ARED placement were derived by computational fluid dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics analysis demonstrated that WSS increased from 0.38 to 0.82 N/m2 in the S+ARED immediately after ARED placement. This augmentation of shear stress was accompanied by (1) lower mean late luminal loss by quantitative angiography ([minus]0.23+/-0.22 versus [minus]0.58+/-0.30 mm, P=0.02), (2) reduction in NH (1.48+/-0.58, 2.46+/-1.25, and 2.36+/-1.13 mm2, P<0.01, respectively, for S+ARED, S[minus]ARED, and SCTRL), and (3) a reduced inflammation score and a reduced injury score. Increments in shear stress did not change the relationship between injury score and NH or between inflammation score and NH.
CONCLUSIONS: The newly developed ARED flow divider significantly increases WSS, and this local increment in WSS is accompanied by a local reduction in NH and a local reduction in inflammation and injury. The present study is therefore the first to provide direct evidence for an important modulating role of shear stress in in-stent neointimal hyperplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742998     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000066914.95878.6D

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Temporal correlation between wall shear stress and in-stent stenosis after Wingspan stent in swine model.

Authors:  M Fujimoto; H Takao; T Suzuki; Y Shobayashi; F Mayor; S Tateshima; M Yamamoto; Y Murayama; F Viñuela
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Modelling intravascular delivery from drug-eluting stents with biodurable coating: investigation of anisotropic vascular drug diffusivity and arterial drug distribution.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang Zhu; Daniel W Pack; Richard D Braatz
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.763

3.  Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics: structured mesh generation from coronary angiography.

Authors:  Gianluca De Santis; Peter Mortier; Matthieu De Beule; Patrick Segers; Pascal Verdonck; Benedict Verhegghe
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Jeng-Jiann Chiu; Shu Chien
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Intimal hyperplasia following implantation of helical-centreline and straight-centreline stents in common carotid arteries in healthy pigs: influence of intraluminal flow.

Authors:  Colin Gerald Caro; Anusha Seneviratne; Kevin B Heraty; Claudia Monaco; Martin G Burke; Rob Krams; Carlos C Chang; Paul Gilson; Gianfilippo Coppola
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Evaluation of the effect of stent strut profile on shear stress distribution using statistical moments.

Authors:  Juan Mejia; Bilal Ruzzeh; Rosaire Mongrain; Richard Leask; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 7.  Swirling Flow and Wall Shear: Evaluating the BioMimics 3D Helical Centerline Stent for the Femoropopliteal Segment.

Authors:  Timothy M Sullivan; Thomas Zeller; Masato Nakamura; Colin G Caro; Michael Lichtenberg
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2018-02-26

Review 8.  Endovascular stent-induced alterations in host artery mechanical environments and their roles in stent restenosis and late thrombosis.

Authors:  Jinxuan Wang; Xuepu Jin; Yuhua Huang; Xiaolin Ran; Desha Luo; Dongchuan Yang; Dongyu Jia; Kang Zhang; Jianhua Tong; Xiaoyan Deng; Guixue Wang
Journal:  Regen Biomater       Date:  2018-05-02

9.  Fenestrated stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: hemodynamic analysis of the effect of fenestrated stents on the renal arteries.

Authors:  Zhonghua Sun; Thanapong Chaichana
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Differential immunological signature at the culprit site distinguishes acute coronary syndrome with intact from acute coronary syndrome with ruptured fibrous cap: results from the prospective translational OPTICO-ACS study.

Authors:  David M Leistner; Nicolle Kränkel; Denitsa Meteva; Youssef S Abdelwahed; Claudio Seppelt; Barbara E Stähli; Himanshu Rai; Carsten Skurk; Alexander Lauten; Hans-Christian Mochmann; Georg Fröhlich; Ursula Rauch-Kröhnert; Eduardo Flores; Matthias Riedel; Lara Sieronski; Sylvia Kia; Elisabeth Strässler; Arash Haghikia; Fabian Dirks; Julia K Steiner; Dominik N Mueller; Hans-Dieter Volk; Jens Klotsche; Michael Joner; Peter Libby; Ulf Landmesser
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.