Literature DB >> 29565357

Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning.

Bo Zhu1,2,3, Jeremiah Z Liu4, Stephen F Cauley1,2, Bruce R Rosen1,2, Matthew S Rosen1,2,3.   

Abstract

Image reconstruction is essential for imaging applications across the physical and life sciences, including optical and radar systems, magnetic resonance imaging, X-ray computed tomography, positron emission tomography, ultrasound imaging and radio astronomy. During image acquisition, the sensor encodes an intermediate representation of an object in the sensor domain, which is subsequently reconstructed into an image by an inversion of the encoding function. Image reconstruction is challenging because analytic knowledge of the exact inverse transform may not exist a priori, especially in the presence of sensor non-idealities and noise. Thus, the standard reconstruction approach involves approximating the inverse function with multiple ad hoc stages in a signal processing chain, the composition of which depends on the details of each acquisition strategy, and often requires expert parameter tuning to optimize reconstruction performance. Here we present a unified framework for image reconstruction-automated transform by manifold approximation (AUTOMAP)-which recasts image reconstruction as a data-driven supervised learning task that allows a mapping between the sensor and the image domain to emerge from an appropriate corpus of training data. We implement AUTOMAP with a deep neural network and exhibit its flexibility in learning reconstruction transforms for various magnetic resonance imaging acquisition strategies, using the same network architecture and hyperparameters. We further demonstrate that manifold learning during training results in sparse representations of domain transforms along low-dimensional data manifolds, and observe superior immunity to noise and a reduction in reconstruction artefacts compared with conventional handcrafted reconstruction methods. In addition to improving the reconstruction performance of existing acquisition methodologies, we anticipate that AUTOMAP and other learned reconstruction approaches will accelerate the development of new acquisition strategies across imaging modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29565357     DOI: 10.1038/nature25988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  25 in total

1.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review.

Authors:  Takeshi Kubo; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Wolfram Stiller; Masaya Takahashi; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Yoshiharu Ohno; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Fast tomographic reconstruction from limited data using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Daniël Maria Pelt; Kees Joost Batenburg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Geodesic image regression with a sparse parameterization of diffeomorphisms.

Authors:  James Fishbaugh; Marcel Prastawa; Guido Gerig; Stanley Durrleman
Journal:  Geom Sci Inf (2013)       Date:  2013

5.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging.

Authors:  Michael T McCann; Emmanuel Froustey; Michael Unser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 10.856

6.  Fast reconstruction for multichannel compressed sensing using a hierarchically semiseparable solver.

Authors:  Stephen F Cauley; Yuanzhe Xi; Berkin Bilgic; Jianlin Xia; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Venkataramanan Balakrishnan; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Mean square optimal NUFFT approximation for efficient non-Cartesian MRI reconstruction.

Authors:  Zhili Yang; Mathews Jacob
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  An SPM8-based approach for attenuation correction combining segmentation and nonrigid template formation: application to simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging.

Authors:  David Izquierdo-Garcia; Adam E Hansen; Stefan Förster; Didier Benoit; Sylvia Schachoff; Sebastian Fürst; Kevin T Chen; Daniel B Chonde; Ciprian Catana
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data.

Authors:  Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Klatzer; Erich Kobler; Michael P Recht; Daniel K Sodickson; Thomas Pock; Florian Knoll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  MGH-USC Human Connectome Project datasets with ultra-high b-value diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Qiuyun Fan; Thomas Witzel; Aapo Nummenmaa; Koene R A Van Dijk; John D Van Horn; Michelle K Drews; Leah H Somerville; Margaret A Sheridan; Rosario M Santillana; Jenna Snyder; Trey Hedden; Emily E Shaw; Marisa O Hollinshead; Ville Renvall; Roberta Zanzonico; Boris Keil; Stephen Cauley; Jonathan R Polimeni; Dylan Tisdall; Randy L Buckner; Van J Wedeen; Lawrence L Wald; Arthur W Toga; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  204 in total

Review 1.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis.

Authors:  Alex Zwanenburg
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A Roadmap for Foundational Research on Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging: From the 2018 NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop.

Authors:  Curtis P Langlotz; Bibb Allen; Bradley J Erickson; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keith Bigelow; Tessa S Cook; Adam E Flanders; Matthew P Lungren; David S Mendelson; Jeffrey D Rudie; Ge Wang; Krishna Kandarpa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Self-supervised learning of physics-guided reconstruction neural networks without fully sampled reference data.

Authors:  Burhaneddin Yaman; Seyed Amir Hossein Hosseini; Steen Moeller; Jutta Ellermann; Kâmil Uğurbil; Mehmet Akçakaya
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Model-Based Deep Learning PET Image Reconstruction Using Forward-Backward Splitting Expectation-Maximization.

Authors:  Abolfazl Mehranian; Andrew J Reader
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 6.  Improvement of image quality at CT and MRI using deep learning.

Authors:  Toru Higaki; Yuko Nakamura; Fuminari Tatsugami; Takeshi Nakaura; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Opening the black box of neural networks: methods for interpreting neural network models in clinical applications.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Marcus W Beck; David A Winkler; Bin Huang; Wilbert Sibanda; Hemant Goyal
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 8.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging technology-bridging the gap between noninvasive human imaging and optical microscopy.

Authors:  Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Technological advances and opportunities for applications continue to abound.

Authors:  Peter van Zijl; Linda Knutsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Image Reconstruction: From Sparsity to Data-adaptive Methods and Machine Learning.

Authors:  Saiprasad Ravishankar; Jong Chul Ye; Jeffrey A Fessler
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 10.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.