| Literature DB >> 35740669 |
Valerio Nardone1, Alfonso Reginelli1, Roberta Grassi1,2, Giovanna Vacca1, Giuliana Giacobbe1,2, Antonio Angrisani1, Alfredo Clemente1, Ginevra Danti3, Pierpaolo Correale4, Salvatore Francesco Carbone5, Luigi Pirtoli6, Lorenzo Bianchi7, Angelo Vanzulli7, Cesare Guida8, Roberto Grassi1,2, Salvatore Cappabianca1.
Abstract
We performed a pilot study to evaluate the use of MRI delta texture analysis (D-TA) as a methodological item able to predict the frequency of complete pathological responses and, consequently, the outcome of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer addressed to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (C-RT) and subsequently, to radical surgery. In particular, we carried out a retrospective analysis including 100 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma who received C-RT and then radical surgery in three different oncological institutions between January 2013 and December 2019. Our experimental design was focused on the evaluation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) at baseline and after C-RT by means of MRI, which was contoured on T2, DWI, and ADC sequences. Multiple texture parameters were extracted by using a LifeX Software, while D-TA was calculated as percentage of variations in the two time points. Both univariate and multivariate analysis (logistic regression) were, therefore, carried out in order to correlate the above-mentioned TA parameters with the frequency of pathological responses in the examined patients' population focusing on the detection of complete pathological response (pCR, with no viable cancer cells: TRG 1) as main statistical endpoint. ROC curves were performed on three different datasets considering that on the 21 patients, only 21% achieved an actual pCR. In our training dataset series, pCR frequency significantly correlated with ADC GLCM-Entropy only, when univariate and binary logistic analysis were performed (AUC for pCR was 0.87). A confirmative binary logistic regression analysis was then repeated in the two remaining validation datasets (AUC for pCR was 0.92 and 0.88, respectively). Overall, these results support the hypothesis that D-TA may have a significant predictive value in detecting the occurrence of pCR in our patient series. If confirmed in prospective and multicenter trials, these results may have a critical role in the selection of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who may benefit form radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; neoadjuvant chemo-radiation; rectal cancer; texture analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35740669 PMCID: PMC9221458 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Acquisition parameters of the three magnetic resonance imaging vendors used in the three datasets.
| Parameters | Training Dataset | Validation Dataset One | Validation Dataset Two |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Signa Excite HD, GE Healthcare 1.5 T | Signa Voyager HD, GE Healthcare 1.5 T | 1.5T system, Achieva XR, Software release 5.3.1, Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands |
| Sequences | FSE T2 (axial, coronal, sagittal), T1 (axial pre and post c.e.), DWI and ADC | FSE T2 (axial, coronal, sagittal), T1 (axial pre and post c.e.), DWI and ADC | FSE T2 (axial, coronal, sagittal), T1 (axial pre and post c.e.), DWI and ADC |
| DWI | B 0. 500. 800 s/mm2 | B 0. 500. 1000 s/mm2 | B 0. 600. 1000 s/mm2 |
Characteristics of patients.
| Characteristic | Training | Validation | Validation | Chi-Square Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Males | 26 (70%) | 21 (64%) | 17 (57%) | |
| Females | 11 (30%) | 12 (36%) | 13 (43%) | |
|
| ||||
| <70 years | 23 (62%) | 22 (64%) | 16 (53%) | |
| >70 years | 14 (38%) | 11 (36%) | 14 (47%) | |
|
| ||||
| cT2 | 8 (22%) | 6 (18%) | 3 (10%) | |
| cT3 | 25 (67%) | 18 (55%) | 20 (66%) | |
| cT4 | 4 (11%) | 9 (27%) | 7 (24%) | |
|
| ||||
| cN0 | 5 (14%) | 4 (12%) | 2 (7%) | |
| cN1/2 | 32 (86%) | 29 (88%) | 28 (93%) | |
|
| ||||
| G1 | 2 (5%) | 3 (9%) | 2 (7%) | |
| G2 | 30 (81%) | 23 (70%) | 20 (67%) | |
| G3 | 5 (14%) | 7 (21%) | 8 (26%) | |
|
| ||||
| 1 | 10 (27%) | 6 (18%) | 5 (17%) | |
| 2 | 13 (35%) | 19 (57%) | 13 (43%) | |
| 3 | 13 (35%) | 8 (24%) | 8 (26%) | |
| 4 | 1 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (14%) |
Univariate analysis (Chi-Square) of the reliable texture features and the chosen endpoint (TRG0) for the training dataset.
| MRI | TA Parameter | Univariate Analysis | Bonferroni Correction |
|---|---|---|---|
| T2-MRI | Volume.ml | 0.49 | NS |
| Skewness | 0.68 | NS | |
| Sphericity | 0.82 | NS | |
| Compacity | 0.21 | NS | |
| GLCM.homogeneity | 0.17 | NS | |
| GLCM.entropy | 0.97 | NS | |
| GLCM.dissimilarity | 0.62 | NS | |
| DWI-MRI | Volume.ml | 0.00018 | 0.0486 |
| Skewness | 0.03 | NS | |
| Kurtosis | 0.20 | NS | |
| Entropy | 0.25 | NS | |
| Compacity | 0.71 | NS | |
| GLCM.homogeneity | 0.45 | NS | |
| GLCM.contrast | 0.37 | NS | |
| GLCM.correlation | 0.72 | NS | |
| GLCM.entropy | 0.0017 | 0.0459 | |
| GLCM.dissimilarity | 0.32 | NS | |
| ADC-MRI | Volume.ml | 0.54 | NS |
| Skewness | 0.98 | NS | |
| Kurtosis | 0.90 | NS | |
| Entropy | 0.42 | NS | |
| Energy | 0.59 | NS | |
| Sphericity | 0.78 | NS | |
| Compacity | 0.11 | NS | |
| GLCM.homogeneity | 0.03 | NS | |
| GLCM.contrast | 0.40 | NS | |
| GLCM.entropy | 0.00017 | 0.00459 | |
| GLCM.dissimilarity | 0.60 | NS | |
| Clinical | Sex | 0.32 | NS |
| Age | 0.25 | NS | |
| Stage | 0.24 | NS | |
| Grading | 0.28 | NS |
Figure 1Box plot of the D-TA ADC GLCM Entropy in the training dataset (left) and validation datasets (right).
Figure 2ROC Curve for the prediction of pCR (TRG 1) for training dataset (left) and validation datasets (right).
Figure 3The cut-off of ADC GLCM Entropy calculated on the training dataset was equal to −0.10. Using this cut-off, the sensibility of the model in the training and in the two validation datasets, respectively, was 70%, 73%, and 100%, the specificity of the models was 74%, 66.7%, and 80%, and the accuracy of the model was 73%, 72.7%, and 80%.
Specificity, sensibility, and accuracy of the cut-off of the texture parameter GLCM. EntropyADC.
| Model | Count | TRG > 0 | TRG0 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training | GLCM.EntropyADC < 0.10 | 7 | 7 | 14 |
| GLCM.EntropyADC > 0.10 | 20 | 3 | 23 | |
| Validation | GLCM.EntropyADC < 0.10 | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| GLCM.EntropyADC > 0.10 | 18 | 0 | 18 | |
| Validation | GLCM.EntropyADC < 0.10 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| GLCM.EntropyADC > 0.10 | 20 | 1 | 21 | |
| Legend | GLCM.EntropyADC < 0.10 | False Positive | True Positive | |
| GLCM.EntropyADC > 0.10 | True Negative | False Negative |