Literature DB >> 24183379

EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum.

Cornelis J H van de Velde1, Petra G Boelens2, Josep M Borras3, Jan-Willem Coebergh4, Andres Cervantes5, Lennart Blomqvist6, Regina G H Beets-Tan7, Colette B M van den Broek2, Gina Brown8, Eric Van Cutsem9, Eloy Espin10, Karin Haustermans11, Bengt Glimelius12, Lene H Iversen13, J Han van Krieken14, Corrie A M Marijnen15, Geoffrey Henning16, Jola Gore-Booth16, Elisa Meldolesi17, Pawel Mroczkowski18, Iris Nagtegaal14, Peter Naredi19, Hector Ortiz20, Lars Påhlman21, Philip Quirke22, Claus Rödel23, Arnaud Roth24, Harm Rutten25, Hans J Schmoll26, Jason J Smith27, Pieter J Tanis28, Claire Taylor29, Arne Wibe30, Theo Wiggers31, Maria A Gambacorta17, Cynthia Aristei32, Vincenzo Valentini33.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Care for patients with colon and rectal cancer has improved in the last 20years; however considerable variation still exists in cancer management and outcome between European countries. Large variation is also apparent between national guidelines and patterns of cancer care in Europe. Therefore, EURECCA, which is the acronym of European Registration of Cancer Care, is aiming at defining core treatment strategies and developing a European audit structure in order to improve the quality of care for all patients with colon and rectal cancer. In December 2012, the first multidisciplinary consensus conference about cancer of the colon and rectum was held. The expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries.
METHODS: The expert panel had delegates of the European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society of Pathology (ESP), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Radiology (ESR), European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP), European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) and the European Colorectal Cancer Patient Organisation (EuropaColon), as well as delegates from national registries or audits. Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. For the Delphi process, multidisciplinary experts were invited to comment and vote three web-based online voting rounds and to lecture on the subjects during the meeting (13th-15th December 2012). The sentences in the consensus document were available during the meeting and a televoting round during the conference by all participants was performed. This manuscript covers all sentences of the consensus document with the result of the voting. The consensus document represents sections on diagnostics, pathology, surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, and follow-up where applicable for treatment of colon cancer, rectal cancer and metastatic colorectal disease separately. Moreover, evidence based algorithms for diagnostics and treatment were composed which were also submitted to the Delphi process.
RESULTS: The total number of the voted sentences was 465. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the experts. Of the 465 sentences, 84% achieved large consensus, 6% achieved moderate consensus, and 7% resulted in minimum consensus. Only 3% was disagreed by more than 50% of the members.
CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary consensus on key diagnostic and treatment issues for colon and rectal cancer management using the Delphi method was successful. This consensus document embodies the expertise of professionals from all disciplines involved in the care for patients with colon and rectal cancer. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms were developed to implement the current evidence and to define core treatment guidance for multidisciplinary team management of colon and rectal cancer throughout Europe.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant treatment; Audit; Colon cancer; Consensus; Delphi method; Multidisciplinary teams; Neoadjuvant treatment; Quality assurance; Rectal cancer; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24183379     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  136 in total

1.  Revisiting Dukes' paradigm; some node positive colon cancer patients have better prognosis than some node negative patients.

Authors:  O Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery with or without Completion Total Mesorectal Excision for T2 and T3 Rectal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeroen W A Leijtens; Thomas W A Koedam; Wernard A A Borstlap; Monique Maas; Pascal G Doornebosch; Tom M Karsten; Eric J Derksen; Laurents P S Stassen; Camiel Rosman; Eelco J R de Graaf; André J A Bremers; Jeroen Heemskerk; Geerard L Beets; Jurriaan B Tuynman; Kevin L J Rademakers
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  T1 colon cancer in the era of screening: risk factors and treatment.

Authors:  F Bianco; S De Franciscis; A Belli; A Falato; R Fusco; D F Altomare; A Amato; C R Asteria; A Avallone; G A Binda; L Boccia; P Buzzo; M Carvello; C Coco; P Delrio; P De Nardi; M Di Lena; A Failla; F La Torre; M La Torre; M Lemma; P Luffarelli; G Manca; I Maretto; F Marino; A Muratore; A Pascariello; S Pucciarelli; D Rega; V Ripetti; G Rizzo; A Serventi; A Spinelli; F Tatangelo; E D L Urso; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 4.  Update on advances and controversy in rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  S Biondo; D Fraccalvieri; T Golda; R Frago; L Trenti; E Kreisler
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Imaging Procedures for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Baeßler; David Maintz; Thorsten Persigehl
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-08

6.  Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve the prognosis of patients after resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Yuen Tan; Huimian Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  International quality assurance project in colorectal cancer-unifying diagnostic and histopathological evaluation.

Authors:  O Jannasch; A Udelnow; G Romano; A Dziki; D Pavalkis; H Lippert; P Mroczkowski
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  The Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Stratifies and Predicts Survival of High-Risk Individuals Among Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Christina W Lee; Katheryn H Wilkinson; Adam C Sheka; Glen E Leverson; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-03-14

9.  The impact of colorectal screening program on the detection of right-sided colorectal cancer. A 5-year cohort study in the Mantua District.

Authors:  Corrado R Asteria; Salvatore Pucciarelli; Leonardo Gerard; Nicola Mantovani; Mauro Pagani; Luigi Boccia; Paolo Ricci; Luigi Troiano; Giuseppe Lucchini; Coriolano Pulica
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  [Metastasized colonic cancer. When are there no indications for primary resection?].

Authors:  R Kube; P Mroczkowski
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.