PURPOSE: The assessment of Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has become a game changer in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate the ability of Radiomics applied to computed tomography (CT) in predicting PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: By applying texture analysis, we retrospectively analyzed 72 patients with advanced NSCLC. The datasets were randomly split into a training cohort (2/3) and a validation cohort (1/3). Forty radiomic features were extracted by manually drawing tumor volumes of interest (VOIs) on baseline contrast-enhanced CT. After selecting features on the training cohort, two predictive models were created using binary logistic regression, one for PD-L1 values ≥ 50% and the other for values between 1 and 49%. The two models were analyzed with ROC curves and tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: The Radiomic Score (Rad-Score) for PD-L1 values ≥ 50%, which consisted of Skewness and Low Gray-Level Zone Emphasis (GLZLM_LGZE), presented a cut-off value of - 0.745 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.811 and 0.789 in the training and validation cohort, respectively. The Rad-Score for PD-L1 values between 1 and 49% consisted of Sphericity, Skewness, Conv_Q3 and Gray Level Non-Uniformity (GLZLM_GLNU), showing a cut-off value of 0.111 with AUC of 0.763 and 0.806 in the two population, respectively. CONCLUSION: Rad-Scores obtained from CT texture analysis could be useful for predicting PD-L1 expression and guiding the therapeutic choice in patients with advanced NSCLC.
PURPOSE: The assessment of Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has become a game changer in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to investigate the ability of Radiomics applied to computed tomography (CT) in predicting PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: By applying texture analysis, we retrospectively analyzed 72 patients with advanced NSCLC. The datasets were randomly split into a training cohort (2/3) and a validation cohort (1/3). Forty radiomic features were extracted by manually drawing tumor volumes of interest (VOIs) on baseline contrast-enhanced CT. After selecting features on the training cohort, two predictive models were created using binary logistic regression, one for PD-L1 values ≥ 50% and the other for values between 1 and 49%. The two models were analyzed with ROC curves and tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: The Radiomic Score (Rad-Score) for PD-L1 values ≥ 50%, which consisted of Skewness and Low Gray-Level Zone Emphasis (GLZLM_LGZE), presented a cut-off value of - 0.745 with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.811 and 0.789 in the training and validation cohort, respectively. The Rad-Score for PD-L1 values between 1 and 49% consisted of Sphericity, Skewness, Conv_Q3 and Gray Level Non-Uniformity (GLZLM_GLNU), showing a cut-off value of 0.111 with AUC of 0.763 and 0.806 in the two population, respectively. CONCLUSION:Rad-Scores obtained from CT texture analysis could be useful for predicting PD-L1 expression and guiding the therapeutic choice in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Authors: Leena Gandhi; Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu; Shirish Gadgeel; Emilio Esteban; Enriqueta Felip; Flávia De Angelis; Manuel Domine; Philip Clingan; Maximilian J Hochmair; Steven F Powell; Susanna Y-S Cheng; Helge G Bischoff; Nir Peled; Francesco Grossi; Ross R Jennens; Martin Reck; Rina Hui; Edward B Garon; Michael Boyer; Belén Rubio-Viqueira; Silvia Novello; Takayasu Kurata; Jhanelle E Gray; John Vida; Ziwen Wei; Jing Yang; Harry Raftopoulos; M Catherine Pietanza; Marina C Garassino Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Ilie; E Long-Mira; C Bence; C Butori; S Lassalle; L Bouhlel; L Fazzalari; K Zahaf; S Lalvée; K Washetine; J Mouroux; N Vénissac; M Poudenx; J Otto; J C Sabourin; C H Marquette; V Hofman; P Hofman Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Corey J Langer; Shirish M Gadgeel; Hossein Borghaei; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; Amita Patnaik; Steven F Powell; Ryan D Gentzler; Renato G Martins; James P Stevenson; Shadia I Jalal; Amit Panwalkar; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Matthew Gubens; Lecia V Sequist; Mark M Awad; Joseph Fiore; Yang Ge; Harry Raftopoulos; Leena Gandhi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Luis Paz-Ares; Alexander Luft; David Vicente; Ali Tafreshi; Mahmut Gümüş; Julien Mazières; Barbara Hermes; Filiz Çay Şenler; Tibor Csőszi; Andrea Fülöp; Jerónimo Rodríguez-Cid; Jonathan Wilson; Shunichi Sugawara; Terufumi Kato; Ki Hyeong Lee; Ying Cheng; Silvia Novello; Balazs Halmos; Xiaodong Li; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Bilal Piperdi; Dariusz M Kowalski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tony S K Mok; Yi-Long Wu; Iveta Kudaba; Dariusz M Kowalski; Byoung Chul Cho; Hande Z Turna; Gilberto Castro; Vichien Srimuninnimit; Konstantin K Laktionov; Igor Bondarenko; Kaoru Kubota; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Jin Zhang; Debra Kush; Gilberto Lopes Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Julie R Brahmer; Ramaswamy Govindan; Robert A Anders; Scott J Antonia; Sarah Sagorsky; Marianne J Davies; Steven M Dubinett; Andrea Ferris; Leena Gandhi; Edward B Garon; Matthew D Hellmann; Fred R Hirsch; Shakuntala Malik; Joel W Neal; Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou; David L Rimm; Lawrence H Schwartz; Boris Sepesi; Beow Yong Yeap; Naiyer A Rizvi; Roy S Herbst Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: J Ferlay; M Colombet; I Soerjomataram; C Mathers; D M Parkin; M Piñeros; A Znaor; F Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 7.396