Literature DB >> 24276776

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study.

Fiona G M Taylor1, Philip Quirke, Richard J Heald, Brendan J Moran, Lennart Blomqvist, Ian R Swift, David Sebag-Montefiore, Paris Tekkis, Gina Brown.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic relevance of preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement is unknown. This follow-up study of 374 patients with rectal cancer reports the relationship between preoperative MRI assessment of CRM staging, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM stage, and clinical variables with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and time to local recurrence (LR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients underwent protocol high-resolution pelvic MRI. Tumor distance to the mesorectal fascia of ≤ 1 mm was recorded as an MRI-involved CRM. A Cox proportional hazards model was used in multivariate analysis to determine the relationship of MRI assessment of CRM to survivorship after adjusting for preoperative covariates.
RESULTS: Surviving patients were followed for a median of 62 months. The 5-year OS was 62.2% in patients with MRI-clear CRM compared with 42.2% in patients with MRI-involved CRM with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.97 (95% CI, 1.27 to 3.04; P < .01). The 5-year DFS was 67.2% (95% CI, 61.4% to 73%) for MRI-clear CRM compared with 47.3% (95% CI, 33.7% to 60.9%) for MRI-involved CRM with an HR of 1.65 (95% CI, 1.01 to 2.69; P < .05). Local recurrence HR for MRI-involved CRM was 3.50 (95% CI, 1.53 to 8.00; P < .05). MRI-involved CRM was the only preoperative staging parameter that remained significant for OS, DFS, and LR on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: High-resolution MRI preoperative assessment of CRM status is superior to AJCC TNM-based criteria for assessing risk of LR, DFS, and OS. Furthermore, MRI CRM involvement is significantly associated with distant metastatic disease; therefore, colorectal cancer teams could intensify treatment and follow-up accordingly to improve survival outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24276776     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  130 in total

1.  Prognostic subdivision of pT2 rectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Susanne Merkel; Klaus Weber; Maximilian Brunner; Justus Baecker; Abbas Agaimy; Jonas Göhl; Werner Hohenberger; Vera Schellerer; Robert Grützmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  What can we learn from oncology surgical trials?

Authors:  Serge Evrard; Pippa McKelvie-Sebileau; Cornelis van de Velde; Bernard Nordlinger; Graeme Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  MRI Local Staging and Restaging in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Gregory dePrisco
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer: Is it needed?

Authors:  Kristijonas Milinis; Michael Thornton; Amir Montazeri; Paul S Rooney
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10

5.  Treatment Intensification for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Impact on Pathological Complete Response and Outcomes.

Authors:  Monica DI Tommaso; Consuelo Rosa; Luciana Caravatta; Antonietta Augurio; Valentina Borzillo; Sara DI Santo; Francesca Perrotti; Maria Taraborrelli; Roberta Cianci; Paolo Innocenti; Pierluigi DI Sebastiano; Antonella Colasante; Domenico Angelucci; Massimo Basti; Giulia Sindici; Lorenzo Mazzola; Giuseppe Pizzicannella; Nicola DI Bartolomeo; Michele Marchioni; Marta DI Nicola; Domenico Genovesi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  MRI can be used to assess advanced T-stage colon carcinoma as well as rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Shinichi Ohta; Norihisa Nitta; Masahiro Yoshimura; Tomoharu Shimizu; Masaji Tani; Ryoji Kushima; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 7.  Preoperative evaluation of colorectal cancer using CT colonography, MRI, and PET/CT.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Kijima; Takahiro Sasaki; Koichi Nagata; Kenichi Utano; Alan T Lefor; Hideharu Sugimoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Advances and challenges in treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Joshua Smith; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  TNM staging of colorectal cancer should be reconsidered by T stage weighting.

Authors:  Jun Li; Bao-Cai Guo; Li-Rong Sun; Jian-Wei Wang; Xian-Hua Fu; Su-Zhan Zhang; Graeme Poston; Ke-Feng Ding
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jörn Gröne; Florian N Loch; Matthias Taupitz; C Schmidt; Martin E Kreis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.