Literature DB >> 22529255

Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years.

Rolf Sauer1, Torsten Liersch, Susanne Merkel, Rainer Fietkau, Werner Hohenberger, Clemens Hess, Heinz Becker, Hans-Rudolf Raab, Marie-Therese Villanueva, Helmut Witzigmann, Christian Wittekind, Tim Beissbarth, Claus Rödel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been established as standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer after first results of the CAO/ARO/AIO-94 [Working Group of Surgical Oncology/Working Group of Radiation Oncology/Working Group of Medical Oncology of the Germany Cancer Society] trial, published in 2004, showed an improved local control rate. However, after a median follow-up of 46 months, no survival benefit could be shown. Here, we report long-term results with a median follow-up of 134 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 823 patients with stage II to III rectal cancer were randomly assigned to preoperative CRT with fluorouracil (FU), total mesorectal excision surgery, and adjuvant FU chemotherapy, or the same schedule of CRT used postoperatively. The study was designed to have 80% power to detect a difference of 10% in 5-year overall survival as the primary end point. Secondary end points included the cumulative incidence of local and distant relapses and disease-free survival.
RESULTS: Of 799 eligible patients, 404 were randomly assigned to preoperative and 395 to postoperative CRT. According to intention-to-treat analysis, overall survival at 10 years was 59.6% in the preoperative arm and 59.9% in the postoperative arm (P = .85). The 10-year cumulative incidence of local relapse was 7.1% and 10.1% in the pre- and postoperative arms, respectively (P = .048). No significant differences were detected for 10-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases (29.8% and 29.6%; P = .9) and disease-free survival.
CONCLUSION: There is a persisting significant improvement of pre- versus postoperative CRT on local control; however, there was no effect on overall survival. Integrating more effective systemic treatment into the multimodal therapy has been adopted in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial to possibly reduce distant metastases and improve survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22529255     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.1836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  595 in total

Review 1.  [R1 resection in rectal cancer].

Authors:  H-R Raab
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Therapeutic results of abdominoperineal resection in the prone jackknife position for T3-4 low rectal cancers.

Authors:  Xiang Hu; Liang Cao; Jian Zhang; Pin Liang; Ge Liu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  [Pathological staging and response evaluation of rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  C Wittekind; B Oberschmid
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [Total mesorectal excision with and without preoperative radiotherapy for patients with resectable rectal cancer: The multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial 12-year follow-up].

Authors:  H A Wolff; T Liersch
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  A Modified Classification of Prognostic Factors Based on Pathological Stage and Tumor Regression Grade in Patients with Rectal Cancer Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Suzuki; Sotaro Sadahiro; Akira Tanaka; Kazutake Okada; Gota Saito; Hiroshi Miyakita; Takeshi Akiba; Hiroshi Yamamuro
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 6.  Adjuvant treatment in older patients with rectal cancer: a population-based review.

Authors:  S L Liu; P O'Brien; Y Zhao; W M Hopman; N Lamond; R Ramjeesingh
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  A new insight into cancer stem cell markers: Could local and circulating cancer stem cell markers correlate in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Alireza Mirzaei; Gholamreza Tavoosidana; Afshin Abdi Rad; Farhad Rezaei; Masoumeh Tavakoli-Yaraki; Azade Amini Kadijani; Ehsan Khalili; Zahra Madjd
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-17

8.  Development and validation of an MRI-based model to predict response to chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Philippe Bulens; Alice Couwenberg; Karin Haustermans; Annelies Debucquoy; Vincent Vandecaveye; Marielle Philippens; Mu Zhou; Olivier Gevaert; Martijn Intven
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Retrospective Comparison of mFOLFOXIRI With XELOX/SOX as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kodama; Tetsuji Terazawa; Yasunobu Ishizuka; Hiroki Yukami; Masahiko Aoki; Takahiro Miyamoto; Toshifumi Yamaguchi; Futukaro Shimamoto; Takayuki Kii; Masahiro Goto; Hiroki Hamamoto; Wataru Osumi; Masashi Yamamoto; Keitaro Tanaka; Jyunji Okuda; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 10.  Controversies in the multimodality management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert Díaz Beveridge; Dilara Akhoundova; Gema Bruixola; Jorge Aparicio
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.