PURPOSE: The objective of this study is finding an intensity based histogram (IBH) signature to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) probability using only pre-treatment magnetic resonance (MR) and validate it externally in order to create a workflow for the external validation of an MR IBH signature and to apply the model out of the environment where it has been tuned. The impact of pCR and the final predictors on the survival outcome were also evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three centers using different MR scanners were involved in this retrospective study. The first center recruited 162 patients for model training, and the second and third centers provided 34 plus 25 patients for external validation. Patients provided written consent. Accrual period was from May 2008 to December 2014. After surgery pathologic response was defined. T2-weighted MR scans acquired before chemoradiation therapy (CRT) were used for analysis addressed on primary lesions. Images were pre-processed using Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) filter with multiple σ, and first order intensity histogram-based features (kurtosis, skewness, and entropy) were extracted. Features selection was performed using Mann-Whitney test. Tumor staging (cT, cN) was added to build a logistic regression model and predict pCR. Model performance was evaluated with internal and external validation using area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and calibration with Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The linear cross-correlation matrix (Pearson's coefficient) and the variance inflation factor (VIF) were used to check the correlation and the co-linearity among the final predictors. The amount of the information added through the radiomics features was estimated by using the DeLong's test, and the impact of pCR and the final predictors on survival outcomes were evaluated through the Kaplan-Meier curves by using the log-rank test and the multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Candidate-to-analysis features were skewness (σ = 0.485, P value = .01) and entropy (σ = 0.344, P value < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed as significant covariates cT (P value < .01), skewness-σ = 0.485 (P value = .01), and entropy-σ = 0.344 (P value < .05). Model AUCs were 0.73 (internal) and 0.75 (external). CONCLUSIONS: This MR-based, vendor-independent model can be helpful for predicting pCR probability in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients only using pre-treatment imaging.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is finding an intensity based histogram (IBH) signature to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) probability using only pre-treatment magnetic resonance (MR) and validate it externally in order to create a workflow for the external validation of an MR IBH signature and to apply the model out of the environment where it has been tuned. The impact of pCR and the final predictors on the survival outcome were also evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three centers using different MR scanners were involved in this retrospective study. The first center recruited 162 patients for model training, and the second and third centers provided 34 plus 25 patients for external validation. Patients provided written consent. Accrual period was from May 2008 to December 2014. After surgery pathologic response was defined. T2-weighted MR scans acquired before chemoradiation therapy (CRT) were used for analysis addressed on primary lesions. Images were pre-processed using Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) filter with multiple σ, and first order intensity histogram-based features (kurtosis, skewness, and entropy) were extracted. Features selection was performed using Mann-Whitney test. Tumor staging (cT, cN) was added to build a logistic regression model and predict pCR. Model performance was evaluated with internal and external validation using area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and calibration with Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The linear cross-correlation matrix (Pearson's coefficient) and the variance inflation factor (VIF) were used to check the correlation and the co-linearity among the final predictors. The amount of the information added through the radiomics features was estimated by using the DeLong's test, and the impact of pCR and the final predictors on survival outcomes were evaluated through the Kaplan-Meier curves by using the log-rank test and the multivariate Cox model. RESULTS: Candidate-to-analysis features were skewness (σ = 0.485, P value = .01) and entropy (σ = 0.344, P value < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed as significant covariates cT (P value < .01), skewness-σ = 0.485 (P value = .01), and entropy-σ = 0.344 (P value < .05). Model AUCs were 0.73 (internal) and 0.75 (external). CONCLUSIONS: This MR-based, vendor-independent model can be helpful for predicting pCR probability in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients only using pre-treatment imaging.
Authors: V Giannini; S Mazzetti; I Bertotto; C Chiarenza; S Cauda; E Delmastro; C Bracco; A Di Dia; F Leone; E Medico; A Pisacane; D Ribero; M Stasi; D Regge Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-01-13 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Philippe Bulens; Alice Couwenberg; Martijn Intven; Annelies Debucquoy; Vincent Vandecaveye; Eric Van Cutsem; André D'Hoore; Albert Wolthuis; Pritam Mukherjee; Olivier Gevaert; Karin Haustermans Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2019-08-17 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Iram Shahzadi; Alex Zwanenburg; Annika Lattermann; Annett Linge; Christian Baldus; Jan C Peeken; Stephanie E Combs; Markus Diefenhardt; Claus Rödel; Simon Kirste; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Esther G C Troost; Steffen Löck Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Natally Horvat; Harini Veeraraghavan; Caio S R Nahas; David D B Bates; Felipe R Ferreira; Junting Zheng; Marinela Capanu; James L Fuqua; Maria Clara Fernandes; Ramon E Sosa; Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam; Giovanni G Cerri; Sergio C Nahas; Iva Petkovska Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Jacob T Antunes; Asya Ofshteyn; Kaustav Bera; Erik Y Wang; Justin T Brady; Joseph E Willis; Kenneth A Friedman; Eric L Marderstein; Matthew F Kalady; Sharon L Stein; Andrei S Purysko; Rajmohan Paspulati; Jayakrishna Gollamudi; Anant Madabhushi; Satish E Viswanath Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Valerio Nardone; Alfonso Reginelli; Cesare Guida; Maria Paola Belfiore; Michelangelo Biondi; Maria Mormile; Fabrizio Banci Buonamici; Eugenio Di Giorgio; Marco Spadafora; Paolo Tini; Roberta Grassi; Luigi Pirtoli; Pierpaolo Correale; Salvatore Cappabianca; Roberto Grassi Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2020-03-31 Impact factor: 3.064