| Literature DB >> 35566343 |
Bruno S Lopes1, Alfizah Hanafiah2, Ramesh Nachimuthu3, Saravanan Muthupandian4, Zarith Nameyrra Md Nesran2, Sandip Patil5.
Abstract
Just over a million people died globally in 2019 due to antibiotic resistance caused by ESKAPE pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species). The World Health Organization (WHO) also lists antibiotic-resistant Campylobacter and Helicobacter as bacteria that pose the greatest threat to human health. As it is becoming increasingly difficult to discover new antibiotics, new alternatives are needed to solve the crisis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Bacteria commonly found in complex communities enclosed within self-produced matrices called biofilms are difficult to eradicate and develop increased stress and antimicrobial tolerance. This review summarises the role of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) in combating the silent pandemic of AMR and their application in clinical medicine, focusing on both the advantages and disadvantages of AMPs as antibiofilm agents. It is known that many AMPs display broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities, but in a variety of organisms AMPs are not stable (short half-life) or have some toxic side effects. Hence, it is also important to develop new AMP analogues for their potential use as drug candidates. The use of one health approach along with developing novel therapies using phages and breakthroughs in novel antimicrobial peptide synthesis can help us in tackling the problem of AMR.Entities:
Keywords: ESKAPE; Gram-negative bacteria; WHO priority pathogens; antimicrobial peptides; antimicrobial resistance; biofilms; public health
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566343 PMCID: PMC9105241 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Various secondary structures of antimicrobial peptides.
Examples of antimicrobial peptides and their secondary structures, sources, and functions.
| References | Antimicrobial Peptide | Secondary Structure | Source | Function/Mode of Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Protegrins | α-helix and β-sheet | Porcine |
Antimicrobial activity against |
| [ | Thanatin | Loop | Insect ( |
Antibacterial activity (disrupts the bacterial outer membrane) |
| [ | Tachyplesins | β-sheet | Horseshoe crab |
Antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria via membrane instability mechanism |
| [ | Bactenecin | Loop | Bovine |
Neurotoxicity |
| [ | Human neutrophil peptides (HNP 1-4) | β-sheet | Human |
Microbial killing Immunomodulative activity |
| [ | Human β-defensins (HBD 1-4) | β-sheet | Human |
Antimicrobial activity Affects immune regulation, apoptosis, and wound healing |
| [ | Lactoferricin B | Loop | Human |
Antimicrobial activity |
| [ | Cathelidicin (LL-37) | α-helix | Human |
Antimicrobial activity, Affects immune regulation, apoptosis, and wound healing |
| [ | Human defensin (HD5-6) | α-helix | Human |
Antimicrobial activity Affects immune regulation, apoptosis, and wound healing |
| [ | Magainin-2 | α-helix | Frog |
Antimicrobial activity and anticancer properties |
| [ | hagfish intestinal AMP (HFIAP)-1, -2, and -3 | α-helix |
Antimicrobial activity against a number of Gram-positive and -negative bacteria | |
| [ | cathelicidin | α-helix | Atlantic Cod ( |
Activity against Gram-negative bacteria |
| [ | rtCATH1 (R146-P181) and rtCATH2 (R143-I178) | α-helix | Rainbow Trout |
Active against |
| [ | cod-defensin | β-sheet | Atlantic cod |
Shows activity against the Gram-positive microbes |
| [ | Pleurocidin | α-helix | winter flounder ( |
Active against both Gram-positive and -negative pathogens |
| [ | Gramicidin | β-sheet | Gram-positive bacteria ( |
Antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria |
| [ | Polymyxin | α-helix |
|
Active against critically important pathogens ( |
| [ | Bacteriocin | α-helix | Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria |
Antimicrobial activity (act by increasing permeability by forming pores) |
| [ | Colicins | α-helix and β-sheet |
|
Channel/pore formation in the cytoplasmic membrane DNA degradation Inhibition of murein and lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis |
| [ | Peptaibols | α-helix | Fungal |
Membrane disruption |
| [ | Plectasin | α-helix | Fungal ( |
Inhibitory activity, predominantly against Gram-positive bacteria such as |
| [ | Micasin | α-helix |
|
Broad-spectrum antibacterial activity against |
| [ | Melittin | α-helix | European honeybee |
Antiviral activity Anticancer activity |
| [ | Phage lysins | α-helix | Bacteriophages |
Weakening the peptidoglycan bacterial cell wall, antibiofilm activity |
| [ | Holins | α-helix | dsDNA bacteriophages |
Membrane depolarization, endolysin activation, and degradation of peptidoglycans |
| [ | HolGH15 | α-helix |
Antibacterial activity against | |
| [ | Cecropin A | α-helix | Cecropia moth ( |
Activity against different inflammatory diseases and cancers Antimicrobial effect, mainly against Gram-negative bacteria |
| [ | Jellein | α-helix | Honey bee royal jelly |
Antibacterial and antifungal activity |
Figure 2The general mechanism of action of antimicrobial peptides.
Antimicrobial peptides effective against bacterial biofilm-producing Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.
| Bacterial Species | Antimicrobial Peptides | References |
|---|---|---|
|
| C16-KGGK | [ |
|
| NA-CATH:ATRA1-ATRA1 | [ |
|
| Analog PepC (A6, A12, and A19) | [ |
|
| Cec4 | [ |
|
| Lactoferrin | [ |
| BMAP-27B | [ | |
|
| Cathelicidin mCRAMP | [ |
| puroindoline A (PinA) | [ |