BACKGROUND: Campylobacter species cause a high proportion of bacterial gastroenteritis cases and are a significant burden on health care systems and economies worldwide; however, the relative contributions of the various possible sources of infection in humans are unclear. METHODS: National-scale genotyping of Campylobacter species was used to quantify the relative importance of various possible sources of human infection. Multilocus sequence types were determined for 5674 isolates obtained from cases of human campylobacteriosis in Scotland from July 2005 through September 2006 and from 999 Campylobacter species isolates from 3417 contemporaneous samples from potential human infection sources. These data were supplemented with 2420 sequence types from other studies, representing isolates from a variety of sources. The clinical isolates were attributed to possible sources on the basis of their sequence types with use of 2 population genetic models, STRUCTURE and an asymmetric island model. RESULTS: The STRUCTURE and the asymmetric island models attributed most clinical isolates to chicken meat (58% and 78% of Campylobacter jejuni and 40% and 56% of Campylobacter coli isolates, respectively), identifying it as the principal source of Campylobacter infection in humans. Both models attributed the majority of the remaining isolates to ruminant sources, with relatively few isolates attributed to wild bird, environment, swine, and turkey sources. CONCLUSIONS: National-scale genotyping was a practical and efficient methodology for the quantification of the contributions of different sources to human Campylobacter infection. Combined with the knowledge that retail chicken is routinely contaminated with Campylobacter, these results are consistent with the view that the largest reductions in human campylobacteriosis in industrialized countries will come from interventions that focus on the poultry industry.
BACKGROUND: Campylobacter species cause a high proportion of bacterial gastroenteritis cases and are a significant burden on health care systems and economies worldwide; however, the relative contributions of the various possible sources of infection in humans are unclear. METHODS: National-scale genotyping of Campylobacter species was used to quantify the relative importance of various possible sources of human infection. Multilocus sequence types were determined for 5674 isolates obtained from cases of human campylobacteriosis in Scotland from July 2005 through September 2006 and from 999 Campylobacter species isolates from 3417 contemporaneous samples from potential human infection sources. These data were supplemented with 2420 sequence types from other studies, representing isolates from a variety of sources. The clinical isolates were attributed to possible sources on the basis of their sequence types with use of 2 population genetic models, STRUCTURE and an asymmetric island model. RESULTS: The STRUCTURE and the asymmetric island models attributed most clinical isolates to chicken meat (58% and 78% of Campylobacter jejuni and 40% and 56% of Campylobacter coli isolates, respectively), identifying it as the principal source of Campylobacter infection in humans. Both models attributed the majority of the remaining isolates to ruminant sources, with relatively few isolates attributed to wild bird, environment, swine, and turkey sources. CONCLUSIONS: National-scale genotyping was a practical and efficient methodology for the quantification of the contributions of different sources to human Campylobacter infection. Combined with the knowledge that retail chicken is routinely contaminated with Campylobacter, these results are consistent with the view that the largest reductions in human campylobacteriosis in industrialized countries will come from interventions that focus on the poultry industry.
Authors: J B Bender; C W Hedberg; D J Boxrud; J M Besser; J H Wicklund; K E Smith; M T Osterholm Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-01-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Josefa M Rangel; Phyllis H Sparling; Collen Crowe; Patricia M Griffin; David L Swerdlow Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Daniel J Wilson; Edith Gabriel; Andrew J H Leatherbarrow; John Cheesbrough; Steven Gee; Eric Bolton; Andrew Fox; Paul Fearnhead; C Anthony Hart; Peter J Diggle Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Noel D McCarthy; Frances M Colles; Kate E Dingle; Mary C Bagnall; Georgina Manning; Martin C J Maiden; Daniel Falush Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: Ozan Gundogdu; Daiani T da Silva; Banaz Mohammad; Abdi Elmi; Brendan W Wren; Arnoud H M van Vliet; Nick Dorrell Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Anne M Ridley; Victoria K Morris; Shaun A Cawthraw; Johanne Ellis-Iversen; Jillian A Harris; Emma M Kennedy; Diane G Newell; Vivien M Allen Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: N D McCarthy; I A Gillespie; A J Lawson; J Richardson; K R Neal; P R Hawtin; M C J Maiden; S J O'Brien Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: K Stingl; M-T Knüver; P Vogt; C Buhler; N-J Krüger; K Alt; B-A Tenhagen; M Hartung; A Schroeter; L Ellerbroek; B Appel; A Käsbohrer Journal: Eur J Microbiol Immunol (Bp) Date: 2012-03-17
Authors: Iain D Ogden; John F Dallas; Marion MacRae; Ovidiu Rotariu; Kenny W Reay; Malcolm Leitch; Ann P Thomson; Samuel K Sheppard; Martin Maiden; Ken J Forbes; Norval J C Strachan Journal: Foodborne Pathog Dis Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.171
Authors: Caroline P A de Haan; Rauni I Kivistö; Marjaana Hakkinen; Jukka Corander; Marja-Liisa Hänninen Journal: BMC Microbiol Date: 2010-07-26 Impact factor: 3.605