| Literature DB >> 35396452 |
Chloé Sarnowski1, Mohsen Ghanbari2,3, Joshua C Bis4, Mark Logue5,6, Myriam Fornage7, Aniket Mishra8, Shahzad Ahmad2,9, Alexa S Beiser10,11,12, Eric Boerwinkle7, Vincent Bouteloup13, Vincent Chouraki14, L Adrienne Cupples10,11, Vincent Damotte14, Charles S DeCarli15, Anita L DeStefano10, Luc Djoussé16, Alison E Fohner17, Carol E Franz18, Tiffany F Kautz19, Jean-Charles Lambert14, Michael J Lyons20, Thomas H Mosley21, Kenneth J Mukamal22, Matthew P Pase23,24, Eliana C Portilla Fernandez2, Robert A Rissman25, Claudia L Satizabal11,12,19, Ramachandran S Vasan11,26, Amber Yaqub2, Stephanie Debette8,27, Carole Dufouil27, Lenore J Launer28, William S Kremen18, William T Longstreth29, M Arfan Ikram2, Sudha Seshadri11,12,19.
Abstract
Circulating total-tau levels can be used as an endophenotype to identify genetic risk factors for tauopathies and related neurological disorders. Here, we confirmed and better characterized the association of the 17q21 MAPT locus with circulating total-tau in 14,721 European participants and identified three novel loci in 953 African American participants (4q31, 5p13, and 6q25) at P < 5 × 10-8. We additionally detected 14 novel loci at P < 5 × 10-7, specific to either Europeans or African Americans. Using whole-exome sequence data in 2,279 European participants, we identified ten genes associated with circulating total-tau when aggregating rare variants. Our genetic study sheds light on genes reported to be associated with neurological diseases including stroke, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's (F5, MAP1B, and BCAS3), with Alzheimer's pathological hallmarks (ADAMTS12, IL15, and FHIT), or with an important function in the brain (PARD3, ELFN2, UBASH3B, SLIT3, and NSD3), and suggests that the genetic architecture of circulating total-tau may differ according to ancestry.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35396452 PMCID: PMC8993877 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03287-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Biol ISSN: 2399-3642
Description of the European-ancestry participants included in the meta-analysis of circulating total-tau levels.
| FHS ( | RSI ( | RSII ( | MEM1 ( | MEM2 ( | CARDIA ( | CHS ( | ARIC ( | VETSA ( | ADNI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men, | 2790 (46) | 1696 (59) | 951 (44) | 153 (45) | 666 (37) | 149 (47) | 523 (37) | 257 (47) | 754 (100) | 292 (60) |
| Age, mean (SD) | 56.81 (13.98) | 75.30 (6.10) | 67.80 (7.10) | 67.60 (8.58) | 71.47 (8.56) | 51.02 (3.25) | 77.91 (4.3) | 63.52 (4.38) | 67.50 (2.51) | 75.44 (6.71) |
| Age, median [25–75%] | 56.1 [46.4–66.3] | 74.4 [70.5–79.4] | 65.5 [62.8–70.8] | 68.0 [62.9–73.6] | 72.2 [66.1–77.6] | 52.0 [49.0–53.5] | 77.0 [75.0–80.3] | 64.0 [60.0–67.0] | 68.1 [65.4–69.7] | 75.8 [71.5–80.1] |
| Circulating t-tau, mean (SD) | 4.13 (2.12) | 2.60 (0.90) | 2.60 (3.10) | 2.10 (0.88) | 2.23 (1.84) | 0.54 (1.26) | 0.46 (2.18) | 0.41 (0.54) | 2.02 (1.23) | 2.88 (1.64) |
| Circulating t-tau, median [25–75%] | 3.91 [3.24–4.73] | 2.50 [1.90–3.0] | 2.40 [1.90–2.90] | 2.01 [1.55–2.60] | 1.86 [1.41–2.60] | 0.34 [0.20–0.57] | 0.27 [0.17–0.43] | 0.18 [0.09–0.34] | 1.76 [1.29–2.32] | 2.71 [1.93–3.45] |
| Circulating t-tau (log), mean (SD) | 1.97 (0.46) | 1.30 (0.50) | 1.20 (0.50) | 0.91 (0.81) | 0.95 (0.73) | −1.54 (1.14) | −1.31 (0.83) | −1.68 (0.96) | 0.82 (0.72) | 0.92 (0.57) |
| Circulating t-tau (log), median [25–75%] | 1.97 [1.70–2.24] | 1.30 [0.90–1.60] | 1.20 [0.90–1.60] | 1.01 [0.63–1.38] | 0.90 [0.50–1.38] | −1.56 [−2.32, −0.81] | −1.30 [−1.75, −0.85] | −1.71 [−2.34, −1.10] | 0.81 [0.37–1.21] | 1.00 [0.66–1.24] |
FHS Framingham Heart Study, RSI and RSII The Rotterdam Study, MEM1 and MEM2 The MEMENTO Study, CARDIA The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study, CHS The Cardiovascular Health Study, VETSA The Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging Study, ARIC The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, ADNI The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Study.
Description of the African American participants included in the meta-analysis of circulating total-tau levels.
| CARDIA ( | CHS ( | ARIC ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Men, | 51 (46) | 96 (35) | 218 (38) |
| Age, mean (SD) | 48.78 (3.46) | 76.32 (4.93) | 61.68 (4.47) |
| Age, median [25–75%] | 48.0 [46.0–51.0] | 75.0 [72.0–80.0] | 61.0 [58.0–65.0] |
| Circulating t-tau, mean (SD) | 0.57 (1.41) | 0.46 (0.94) | 0.50 (0.77) |
| Circulating t-tau, median [25–75%] | 0.37 [0.22–0.60] | 0.28 [0.18–0.46] | 0.31 [0.20–0.50] |
| Circulating t-tau (log), mean (SD) | −1.54 (1.03) | −1.24 (0.85) | −1.57 (1.10) |
| Circulating t-tau (log), median [25–75%] | −1.43 [−2.24, −0.78] | −1.27 [−1.73, −0.78] | −1.69 [−2.36, −0.99] |
CARDIA The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study, CHS The Cardiovascular Health Study, ARIC The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.
Fig. 1Manhattan plot of association P values for the African American specific meta-analysis of GWAS of circulating total-tau levels.
The –log10(P)-value for each single nucleotide variant on the y axis is plotted against the build 37 genomic position on the x axis (chromosomal coordinate). The dashed horizontal red line indicates the genome-wide significance threshold of P = 5 × 10−8 and the dashed horizontal black line indicates the threshold of P = 5 × 10−7.
Fig. 2Manhattan plot of association P values for the European ancestry specific meta-analysis of GWAS of circulating total-tau levels.
The –log10(P)-value for each single nucleotide variant on the y axis is plotted against the build 37 genomic position on the x axis (chromosomal coordinate). The dashed horizontal red line indicates the genome-wide significance threshold of P = 5 × 10−8 and the dashed horizontal black line indicates the threshold of P = 5 × 10−7. The y axis was truncated for ease of interpretation.
Lead genetic variants passing the genome-wide significance threshold (P < 5 × 10−8) in the meta-analysis of GWAS of circulating total-tau levels in European-ancestry participants (N = 14,721) or African American participants (N = 953).
| Europeans ( | African Americans ( | Multi-ancestry | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rsid | Chr:b37Pos | Alleles | EAF | Beta | SE | I2 | PQ | EAF | Beta | SE | I2 | PQ | I2 | PQ | Gene | ||||
| rs111836296* | 4:142551581 | T/C | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.06 | −0.54 | 0.10 | 0 | 0.37 | -- | -- | -- | intergenic | ||
| rs74710969* | 5:33618142 | T/G | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 0.11 | −0.53 | 0.10 | 0 | 0.88 | -- | -- | -- | |||
| rs674432 | 6:158101153 | C/G | 0.83 | −0.001 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0 | 0.45 | 0.97 | 0.68 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.32 | 7.6E-06 | 96.84 | intergenic | |||
| rs7502280* | 17:43670221 | T/G | 0.88 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.53 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | intergenic | ||
| rs242557 | 17:44019712 | A/G | 0.38 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 42.5 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 76.2 | 0.04 | 76.46 | 0.04 | ||||
| rs2942003 | 17:44576704 | T/G | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 44.1 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.51 | 0 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.57 | intergenic | |||
EAF effect allele frequency, Alleles: effect (Alternate) allele/non-effect (Reference) allele.
I2: I-square heterogeneity statistic; PQ: Cochran’s Q statistic’s P value.
P values in bold pass the genome-wide significance threshold of P < 5 × 10−8.
*rs111836296 on chr4 and rs74710969 on chr5 are extremely rare in Europeans and thus they were not included in the multi-ancestry meta-analysis; rs7502280 is not present in the 1000 Genomes reference panel and thus was not present in the African American GWAS results.
PRE2: Han and Eskin’s random effects model to detect associations under heterogeneity[59].
Fig. 3Regional association plot at the MAPT 17q21 locus.
Genetic variants are plotted with their P values (-log10 values, left y axis) as a function of the build 37 genomic position (x axis). Estimated recombination rates (right y axis) reflect the local linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure around the top distinct associated genetic variants (red and blue diamonds, denoting rs242557 and rs2942003, respectively), identified using stepwise model selection procedure, and their correlated proxies. Genetic variants in LD with rs242557 are indicated with circles according to a light to dark red scale, from r² = 0 to 1. Genetic variants in LD with rs2942003 are indicated with triangles according to a light to dark blue scale, from r² = 0 to 1. Gray crosses (X) represent SNPs with missing LD. The third distinct genetic variant (rs7502280), indicated in black on the plot, was not present in the reference panel to calculate the LD with the other variants in the region. Reference panel used was the 1000 Genomes November 2014 European population.
Results of the APOE4-stratified analyses for the lead genetic variants in each locus passing the threshold of P < 5 × 10−7 in the European meta-analysis of GWAS of circulating total-tau levels.
| Main analysis ( | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rsid | Chr | Build 37 Pos (bp) | Eff | NEff | EAF | Beta | Beta | Beta | Gene | |||
| rs6686805 | 1 | 169,512,643 | A | C | 0.67 | −0.04 | 3.4E-07 | −0.02 | 0.21 | −0.04 | 5.1E-07 | |
| rs139843727 | 3 | 66,316,022 | A | C | 0.99 | 0.22 | 2.9E-07 | 0.08 | 0.44 | 0.24 | 6.5E-07 | |
| rs7502280 | 17 | 43,670,221 | T | G | 0.88 | 0.17 | 8.0E-38 | 0.16 | 2.2E-09 | 0.18 | 1.4E-30 | intergenic |
| rs242557 | 17 | 44,019,712 | A | G | 0.38 | 0.20 | 8.9E-143 | 0.19 | 1.3E-37 | 0.20 | 1.4E-105 | |
| rs2942003 | 17 | 44,576,704 | T | G | 0.34 | 0.16 | 1.9E-78 | 0.17 | 3.5E-22 | 0.16 | 3.4E-58 | intergenic |
| rs4968553 | 17 | 59,428,962 | C | G | 0.16 | −0.05 | 4.6E-07 | −0.05 | 0.02 | −0.06 | 1.7E-07 | |
EAF effect allele frequency, Eff effect (alternate) allele, Neff non-effect (reference) allele.
The association of the two SNPs defining APOE in the main European meta-analysis were: rs429358-T (Beta = −0.02, P = 0.10) and rs7412-T (Beta = 0.01, P = 0.49).
Look-up of the main hits (P < 10−5) from the published ADNI GWAS of circulating tau levels (Chen et al., 2017) in our European meta-analysis of GWAS of circulating total-tau levels (seven studies excluding ADNI).
| Main analysis ( | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rsid | Chr | Build 37 Pos (bp) | Eff | NEff | EAF | Beta | Beta | Beta | Gene | |||
| rs2187213 | 6 | 162,634,337 | A | G | 0.35 | 0.0005 | 0.95 | 0.005 | 0.77 | −0.0006 | 0.95 | |
| rs7047280 | 9 | 23,297,808 | T | C | 0.60 | −0.0009 | 0.90 | −0.008 | 0.56 | 0.003 | 0.71 | |
| rs7072793 | 10 | 6,106,266 | T | C | 0.59 | 0.008 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.002 | 0.82 | |
| rs242557 | 17 | 44,019,712 | A | G | 0.36 | 0.20 | 6.4E-136 | 0.19 | 3.0E-35 | 0.20 | 1.4E-101 | |
EAF effect allele frequency, Eff effect (alternate) allele, Neff non-effect (reference) allele.