Michelle M Mielke1,2, Clinton E Hagen3, Alexandra M V Wennberg1, David C Airey4, Rodolfo Savica1,2, David S Knopman2, Mary M Machulda5, Rosebud O Roberts1,2, Clifford R Jack6, Ronald C Petersen2, Jeffrey L Dage4. 1. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 6. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
Importance: The utility of plasma total tau level as a prognostic marker for cognitive decline and dementia is not well understood. Objectives: To determine (1) the association between plasma total tau level, cognitive decline, and risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia; (2) whether this association differs by the presence of elevated brain amyloid β (Aβ); and (3) whether plasma total tau level is associated with cognitive decline over a short interval of 15 months. Design, Setting, and Participants: The present analyses included 458 participants who were enrolled in a population-based cohort study between October 2008 and June 2013. All included participants had available plasma total tau levels, Aβ positron emission tomography imaging, and a complete neuropsychological examine at the same visit, as well as at least 1 follow-up visit. Exposures: Concentration of plasma total tau. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of MCI and dementia; global and domain-specific cognitive decline. Results: Of the 458 participants, 287 (62.7%) were men; mean (SD) age was 80.6 (5.6) years. Among cognitively normal (CN) participants oversampled for elevated brain Aβ, both the middle (hazard ratio [HR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.25-4.72) and highest (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.01-4.06) tertiles of plasma total tau level, compared with the lowest, were associated with an increased risk of MCI. Among participants with MCI, higher plasma total tau levels were not significantly associated with risk of dementia (all-cause dementia or Alzheimer disease). Among all participants, higher levels of plasma total tau, examined as a continuous variable, were associated with significant (P < .05) declines in global cognition, memory, attention, and visuospatial ability over a median follow-up of 3.0 years (range, 1.1-4.9 years). In additional analyses restricting the follow-up to 15 months, plasma total tau did not predict decline among CN participants. However, among participants with MCI, higher plasma total tau levels were associated with greater decline in both visuospatial ability (regression coefficient [b] = -0.50 [0.15], P < .001) and global cognition (b = -0.27 [0.10], P = .009) at 15 months. Adjusting for elevated brain Aβ did not attenuate any association. There was no interaction between plasma total tau level and brain Aβ for prognosis with any outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that elevated plasma total tau levels are associated with cognitive decline, but the results differ based on cognitive status and the duration of follow-up. The association between plasma total tau levels and cognition is independent of elevated brain Aβ.
Importance: The utility of plasma total tau level as a prognostic marker for cognitive decline and dementia is not well understood. Objectives: To determine (1) the association between plasma total tau level, cognitive decline, and risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia; (2) whether this association differs by the presence of elevated brain amyloid β (Aβ); and (3) whether plasma total tau level is associated with cognitive decline over a short interval of 15 months. Design, Setting, and Participants: The present analyses included 458 participants who were enrolled in a population-based cohort study between October 2008 and June 2013. All included participants had available plasma total tau levels, Aβ positron emission tomography imaging, and a complete neuropsychological examine at the same visit, as well as at least 1 follow-up visit. Exposures: Concentration of plasma total tau. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of MCI and dementia; global and domain-specific cognitive decline. Results: Of the 458 participants, 287 (62.7%) were men; mean (SD) age was 80.6 (5.6) years. Among cognitively normal (CN) participants oversampled for elevated brain Aβ, both the middle (hazard ratio [HR], 2.43; 95% CI, 1.25-4.72) and highest (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.01-4.06) tertiles of plasma total tau level, compared with the lowest, were associated with an increased risk of MCI. Among participants with MCI, higher plasma total tau levels were not significantly associated with risk of dementia (all-cause dementia or Alzheimer disease). Among all participants, higher levels of plasma total tau, examined as a continuous variable, were associated with significant (P < .05) declines in global cognition, memory, attention, and visuospatial ability over a median follow-up of 3.0 years (range, 1.1-4.9 years). In additional analyses restricting the follow-up to 15 months, plasma total tau did not predict decline among CN participants. However, among participants with MCI, higher plasma total tau levels were associated with greater decline in both visuospatial ability (regression coefficient [b] = -0.50 [0.15], P < .001) and global cognition (b = -0.27 [0.10], P = .009) at 15 months. Adjusting for elevated brain Aβ did not attenuate any association. There was no interaction between plasma total tau level and brain Aβ for prognosis with any outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that elevated plasma total tau levels are associated with cognitive decline, but the results differ based on cognitive status and the duration of follow-up. The association between plasma total tau levels and cognition is independent of elevated brain Aβ.
Authors: Guy M McKhann; David S Knopman; Howard Chertkow; Bradley T Hyman; Clifford R Jack; Claudia H Kawas; William E Klunk; Walter J Koroshetz; Jennifer J Manly; Richard Mayeux; Richard C Mohs; John C Morris; Martin N Rossor; Philip Scheltens; Maria C Carrillo; Bill Thies; Sandra Weintraub; Creighton H Phelps Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Jeffrey L Dage; Alexandra M V Wennberg; David C Airey; Clinton E Hagen; David S Knopman; Mary M Machulda; Rosebud O Roberts; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Michelle M Mielke Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Bob Olsson; Ronald Lautner; Ulf Andreasson; Annika Öhrfelt; Erik Portelius; Maria Bjerke; Mikko Hölttä; Christoffer Rosén; Caroline Olsson; Gabrielle Strobel; Elizabeth Wu; Kelly Dakin; Max Petzold; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Henrik Zetterberg; David Wilson; Ulf Andreasson; Lennart Minthon; Kaj Blennow; Jeffrey Randall; Oskar Hansson Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2013-03-28 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Niklas Mattsson; Henrik Zetterberg; Shorena Janelidze; Philip S Insel; Ulf Andreasson; Erik Stomrud; Sebastian Palmqvist; David Baker; Cristina A Tan Hehir; Andreas Jeromin; David Hanlon; Linan Song; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Michael W Weiner; Oskar Hansson; Kaj Blennow Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Clinton E Hagen; Jing Xu; Xiyun Chai; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; David C Airey; David S Knopman; Rosebud O Roberts; Mary M Machulda; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Jeffrey L Dage Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Sara M Lippa; Ping-Hong Yeh; Jessica Gill; Louis M French; Tracey A Brickell; Rael T Lange Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-04-09 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Zhicheng Chen; David Mengel; Ashvini Keshavan; Robert A Rissman; Andrew Billinton; Michael Perkinton; Jennifer Percival-Alwyn; Aaron Schultz; Michael Properzi; Keith Johnson; Dennis J Selkoe; Reisa A Sperling; Purvish Patel; Henrik Zetterberg; Douglas Galasko; Jonathan M Schott; Dominic M Walsh Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Yiqiang Zhan; Mark S Clements; Rosebud O Roberts; Maria Vassilaki; Brooke R Druliner; Lisa A Boardman; Ronald C Petersen; Chandra A Reynolds; Nancy L Pedersen; Sara Hägg Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Harald Hampel; Sid E O'Bryant; José L Molinuevo; Henrik Zetterberg; Colin L Masters; Simone Lista; Steven J Kiddle; Richard Batrla; Kaj Blennow Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Michael A Sugarman; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Yorghos Tripodis; Ann C McKee; Thor D Stein; Brett Martin; Joseph N Palmisano; Eric G Steinberg; Irene Simkin; Andrew E Budson; Ronald Killiany; Maureen K O'Connor; Rhoda Au; Wendy Wei Qiao Qiu; Lee E Goldstein; Neil W Kowall; Jesse Mez; Robert A Stern; Michael L Alosco Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 4.673