Literature DB >> 35294174

Assembly of Dynamic Gated and Cascaded Transient DNAzyme Networks.

Jiantong Dong1, Yu Ouyang1, Jianbang Wang1, Michael P O'Hagan1, Itamar Willner1.   

Abstract

The dynamic transient formation and depletion of G-quadruplexes regulate gene replication and transcription. This process was found to be related to various diseases such as cancer and premature aging. We report on the engineering of nucleic acid modules revealing dynamic, transient assembly and disassembly of G-quadruplex structures and G-quadruplex-based DNAzymes, gated transient processes, and cascaded dynamic transient reactions that involve G-quadruplex and DNAzyme structures. The dynamic transient processes are driven by functional DNA reaction modules activated by a fuel strand and guided toward dissipative operation by a nicking enzyme (Nt.BbvCI). The dynamic networks were further characterized by computational simulation of the experiments using kinetic models, allowing us to predict the dynamic performance of the networks under different auxiliary conditions applied to the systems. The systems reported herein could provide functional DNA machineries for the spatiotemporal control of G-quadruplex structures perturbing gene expression and thus provide a therapeutic means for related emergent diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA nanotechnology; DNA network; G-quadruplex; dissipative; machinery; nicking enzyme; out-of-equilibrium

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294174      PMCID: PMC9047661          DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c11631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   18.027


Introduction

Different biological processes such as cell proliferation,[1,2] cell motility,[3,4] and signal promotion[5] represent spatiotemporal reactions proceeding under dissipative, out-of-equilibrium conditions. Substantial recent research efforts are directed toward the development of synthetic systems emulating such processes. For example, the GTP-driven growth and division of protein fibrils in coacervated droplets was suggested as a model system mimicking spatiotemporal cell division.[6] Also, the dissipative carbodiimide-fueled synthesis of anhydrides[7] and the transient assembly and disassembly of fibers by the catalyzed hydrolysis of peptides[8] were demonstrated in systems operating out-of-equilibrium. Within these efforts, the information encoded in nucleic acids provides versatile means to assemble spatiotemporal reaction networks and circuitries. The possibilities to control duplex strand displacement processes by fuel/antifuel strands dictated by the stability of the duplexes,[9,10] the reconfiguration of triplex nucleic acids through strand displacement or auxiliary triggers,[11] e.g., pH, the use of photoisomerizable intercalators, such as trans/cis-azobenzene, to assemble/disassemble nucleic acid duplexes,[12−14] and the many available enzymes to cleave or ligate nucleic acids, such as endonucleases,[15,16] nickases,[17] exonucleases,[18,19] DNAase,[20] ligase,[21−23] or biocatalytic nucleic acids (DNAzymes),[24−28] provide a rich arsenal of functional reconfiguration motives. Besides using these molecular tools to design DNA-based switches[29] and machines,[30−35] dynamic networks and circuitries, such as a synthetic transcriptional clock,[36] transcriptional oscillators,[37] bistable transcriptional switches,[38] and transcriptional regulatory networks[39] were demonstrated. Also, wired small DNA templates were cascaded to yield dynamically controlled oscillatory outputs,[40] and the dynamic out-of-equilibrium operations of such systems have been suggested to mimic natural ecosystems.[41] In particular, DNA reaction modules operating transient, out-of-equilibrium, processes were recently developed. For example, the formation of a ligand-aptamer complex, e.g., the AMP-aptamer complex, and its subsequent biocatalytic separation resulted in the assembly and dynamic depletion of an aptamer-ligand complex as a reaction intermediate.[42] In addition, different enzymes such as endonucleases,[43] nicking enzymes,[44] or synthetic catalytic nucleic acids, DNAzymes,[45] were applied as catalysts to control the dynamic transient reconfiguration of DNA networks that stimulate the assembly and dissipative depletion of DNA structures. Biocatalytically driven gated transient systems and dissipative cascades[44] were demonstrated, and the ATP-fueled transient ligation of DNAzyme subunits to yield catalytic DNAzymes was reported.[46] In addition, the biocatalytically driven transient reconfiguration of constitutional dynamic networks was reported,[47] and a dynamic transient feedback driven DNA network effecting the synthesis of oligonucleotides was coupled to giant membrane vesicles, thus acting as a protocell.[48] The triggered formation and dissipation of the biopolymer intermediate demonstrated signal-responsive adaptive properties of the protocell, mimicking cellular homeostasis. Different applications of transient DNA networks were suggested, such as the temporary uptake and release of loads[49,50] and the transient control over the optical properties of nucleic acid functionalized Au nanoparticles, semiconductor quantum dots or metal nanoclusters through their transient aggregation and disaggregation.[51] G-quadruplexes attract substantial research interest as functional reconfigurable nucleic acid based structures. DNA switches[52−55] and machines[56−60] relying on the reconfiguration of G-quadruplexes and the switchable catalytic activities of hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzymes,[61] have been a subject of extensive research. Different applications of reconfigurable G-quadruplex nanostructures were addressed including their use as reversible gating units of drug-loaded carriers,[62,63] functional units controlling the stiffness of hydrogel matrices for shape-memory and controlled drug release,[64,65] and the self-organization of photodynamic therapeutic agents.[66,67] The dynamic transient formation and depletion of G-quadruplexes regulate the replication and transcription of genes,[68−73] and the dynamic folding of G-quadruplexes was found to be important in the telomerase-stimulated synthesis of telomeres.[74] Indeed, perturbing the folding and unfolding dynamics of G-quadruplexes was found to be related to various human diseases caused by genomic instability, such as premature aging and cancer.[75] Realizing that G-quadruplexes are unfolded in nature by helicase and that helicase efficiency could affect the spatiotemporal formation and disassembly of G-quadruplexes leading to these respective biological disorders, the development of synthetic dynamic routes to form and unwind G-quadruplexes could provide a therapeutic means for G-quadruplex-related diseases. In the present study, we introduce nucleic acid systems demonstrating the dynamic transient assembly/disassembly and operation of G-quadruplex structures. We discuss means to control the dynamic processes by auxiliary stimuli, such as the concentrations of the triggering stimuli and the accompanying biocatalysts and strategies to guide the dynamic transitions of the systems by controlling the effects of inhibitors on the gating of the process. In particular, we demonstrate the integration of the dynamic reconfiguration of the G-quadruplex within a cascaded transformation involving information transfer and dynamic intercommunication between two dissipative transient systems.

Results and Discussion

Figure A depicts the transient assembly of a hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme structure. The reaction module, state I, includes two duplexes, L1/T1 and G1/C1, and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI, which acts as catalyst that controls the transient dissipative process. Hemin is added as an auxiliary effector to the reaction module. The strand G1 in the duplex G1/C1 consists of a guanosine-rich sequence that under appropriate conditions can assemble into a G-quadruplex. Subjecting the reaction module to trigger L1′ displaces duplex L1/T1 to yield duplex L1/L1′. The released strand T1 displaces duplex G1/C1 to yield duplex T1/C1 while releasing the strand G1 that assembles in the presence of K+ ions and hemin into the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. Duplex L1/L1′ is engineered to be cleaved by nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI resulting in the cleavage of L1′ and the separation of L1. The released strand L1 then displaces duplex T1/C1, releasing C1 which disassembles the G-quadruplex through duplex formation to regenerate the initial reaction module, state I. Thus, the dynamic events proceeding in the network lead to the transient assembly and dissipative depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. The hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme catalyzed oxidation of 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS2–) to the colored ABTS•– (λ = 420 nm) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), provides a readout signal for the transient formation and depletion of the DNAzyme. Figure B depicts the time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– formation by the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme at different time intervals of the transient dynamic operation of the dissipative machinery shown in Figure A. Using an appropriate calibration curve, relating the time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– to known standard concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, Figure S1, the transient concentration changes of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme were derived (Figure C, dots). A kinetics model that accounts for the different steps involved in the transient process was formulated (Figure S2) and solved computationally to determine the rate constants that describe the experimental results. The best-fit curve overlaying the experimental result is shown in Figure C (curve a′). The derived computational rate constants are summarized in Table S1. For a detailed description of the procedure for the computational simulations presented in the study, see the Supporting Information, page S6. The computationally simulated results are valuable to predict behavior of the system under different auxiliary experimental conditions. Realizing that the dynamic experiments shown in Figure C were obtained in the presence of L1′ (4 μM) and Nt.BbvCI (0.046 μM), the derived transient behavior of the system at two concentrations of L1′ (2 and 6 μM) and a constant concentration of Nt.BbvCI (0.046 μM) were displayed in curves b′ and c′ (Figure D). The predicted dynamic behavior was then experimentally validated, as shown with dots in curves b and c. Similarly, Figure E depicts curve d′ that predicts the transient behavior of the system in the presence of a higher concentration of the nicking enzyme (0.069 μM) and L1′ (4 μM), and the dots (curve d) represent the experimental validation of the predicted curve. (For the experimental raw data leading to the results displayed in Figure D,E, see Figure S3.) Very good agreement between the predicted transient dynamic kinetics patterns of the systems at different auxiliary conditions and the experimental results is demonstrated, indicating the success of the computational modeling of the kinetics of the complex dynamic machinery. The formation and depletion of the G-quadruplex in the system was further supported by circular dichroism (CD) experiments (see Figure S4 and the accompanying discussion). In addition, the transient operation of the system shown in Figure was further supported by quantitative gel electrophoretic experiments following the transient depletion and recovery of constituents L1/T1 and G1/C1 (see Figure S5 and the accompanying discussion).
Figure 1

(A) Schematic illustration of the reaction module for the transient formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. (B) Time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme formed at different time-intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 12 h, and (h) 24 h. (C) Dots, curve a; transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme using the kinetic model of the reaction module (Figure S2). Experimental and simulated results correspond to the reaction module consisting of [L1/T1] = 1 μM, [G1/C1] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior of the reaction module state I, under different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L1′] = 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence of [L1′] = 6 μM. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); solid line, curve d′, computationally predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM; dots, curve d, experimentally validated results. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C).

(A) Schematic illustration of the reaction module for the transient formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. (B) Time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme formed at different time-intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 12 h, and (h) 24 h. (C) Dots, curve a; transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme using the kinetic model of the reaction module (Figure S2). Experimental and simulated results correspond to the reaction module consisting of [L1/T1] = 1 μM, [G1/C1] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior of the reaction module state I, under different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L1′] = 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence of [L1′] = 6 μM. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); solid line, curve d′, computationally predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM; dots, curve d, experimentally validated results. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C). A second reaction module demonstrating the transient dynamic assembly of a supramolecular hemin/G-quadruplex, consisting of two G subunits, is depicted in Figure A. The reaction module in state II is composed of duplex L2/T2, hairpin structure G2, and single-strand G3 as constituents, nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI as the participating catalyst, and hemin as the DNAzyme cofactor. Strands G2 and G3 include guanosine-rich sequences (blue) that act as subunits that assemble, under appropriate conditions, into the hemin/G-quadruplex supramolecular DNAzyme. Subjecting the reaction module in state II to trigger strand L2′ displaces duplex L2/T2 to yield L2/L2′, and the released strand, T2, opens hairpin G2 while simultaneously bridging the strands G2/G3 and promoting their self-assembly into the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. Duplex L2/L2′ is, however, engineered to include the nicking site in strand L2′ to be cleaved by Nt.BbvCI. Cleavage of L2′ leads to the release of L2 that displaces strand T2 from supramolecular complex T2/G2+G3, leading to separation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme and to the eventual recovery of the rest module in state II. Thus, the network displayed in Figure A leads to the dynamic, transient formation and depletion of the supramolecular hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme structure. The dynamic behavior of the system was probed by the DNAzyme-catalyzed oxidation of ABTS2– to ABTS•–. Figure B depicts the time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by the dynamically formed hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme samples after different time intervals following the activation of the transient system. Using an appropriate calibration curve, relating the time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– to known concentrations of the supramolecular hemin/G-quadruplex (Figure S6), the concentrations of the transiently formed and depleted DNAzyme complex T2/G2+G3 were evaluated, Figure C (dotted profile). The full absorption spectra of ABTS•– generated after a fixed time interval of 100 s by the samples withdrawn at differed time intervals following the activation of the transient system are presented in Figure S7A. The full absorption spectra of ABTS•– generated after 100 s by known concentrations of the DNAzyme T2/G2+G3 are presented in Figure S7B. The absorbance values at λ = 420 nm were used to derive a respective calibration curve (Figure S7C), following which the absorbance values recorded for the transient samples at λ = 420 nm, ε = 36 000 /(M·cm) (Figure S7A), enabled the derivation of the transient concentrations of T2/G2+G3 generated in the transient system (Figure S7D). The kinetic model corresponding to the transient scheme depicted in Figure A was formulated (Figure S8). The computationally simulated kinetic curve is presented as the solid curve (red) overlaid on the experimental data, Figure C. The derived rate constants (Table S2) were then used to predict the behavior of the network at different auxiliary conditions, and the predicted results were experimentally validated (curves b/b′, c/c′, and d/d′ in Figure D,E; the raw results are displayed in Figure S9). The formation and depletion of the supramolecular G-quadruplex in the system was further supported by CD experiments (see Figure S10 and the accompanying discussion). Additionally, the transient operation of the system was supported by quantitative gel electrophoretic experiments following the transient depletion and recovery of the constituents L2/T2, Figure S11 and the accompanying discussion.
Figure 2

(A) Schematic diagram of the reaction module leading to the transient formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme composed of two subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by the hemin/G-quadruplex T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme formed at different time intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 10 h, (h) 12 h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme upon using the kinetic model of the reaction module (Figure S8). Experimental and fitted results correspond to the reaction module consisting of [L2/T2] = 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM, [G3] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior of the reaction module under different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L2′] = 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence of [L2′] = 6 μM. All other conditions are the same as those in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); solid curve d′, computationally predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM; dots, curve d, experimentally validated results. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C).

(A) Schematic diagram of the reaction module leading to the transient formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme composed of two subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by the hemin/G-quadruplex T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme formed at different time intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 10 h, (h) 12 h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme upon using the kinetic model of the reaction module (Figure S8). Experimental and fitted results correspond to the reaction module consisting of [L2/T2] = 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM, [G3] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior of the reaction module under different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L2′] = 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence of [L2′] = 6 μM. All other conditions are the same as those in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); solid curve d′, computationally predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM; dots, curve d, experimentally validated results. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C). The successful assembly of transient catalytic DNAzymes by reaction modules consisting of appropriately engineered nucleic acid subunits as constituents was then applied to design reaction modules enabling the assembly of other transient DNAzyme nanostructures. Figure (A) introduces a reaction module, state III, that allows the transient operation of a Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme. The reaction module consists of duplex L3/T3, the added subunits M1, M2, and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI. Upon triggering the module consisting of state III with L3′, the duplex L3/T3 is displaced to yield the duplex L3/L3′ and the released strand T3, bridges the constituents M1/M2 to yield Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme. Nicking the duplex L3/L3′ cleaves L3′ and the separated strand L3 displaces the intermediate Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme to yield the energetically stabilized duplex L3/T3, resulting in the recovery of the rest module in state III. The transient formation and depletion of the intermediate T3/M1+M2 Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme was probed by withdrawing samples from the reaction mixture at different time intervals of the dynamic operation of the system, and stimulating Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme-induced cleavage of the fluorophore/quencher-modified substrate, S1 (F = FAM; Q = BHQ1). The resulting time-dependent fluorescence changes of the cleaved product, Figure B reflect the content of the catalytic Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme. By applying an appropriate calibration curve corresponding to the rates of the fluorescence changes (λem = 516 nm) of the cleaved substrate S1 by different known standard concentrations of the DNAzyme (Figure S12), the transient concentrations of the formed and dissipated Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, T3/M1+M2 were evaluated, Figure C dots. A kinetic model was formulated (Figures S13 and S14 and the accompanying discussion) for the dynamic scheme shown in Figure A, and the experimental results were simulated using the kinetic model to yield the best-fit curve, the solid red transient Figure C. The set of rate constants derived from the fitted curve are summarized in Table S3. As before, the derived rate constants and kinetic model were used to predict the behavior of the transient system, in the presence of variable concentrations of the trigger, L3′ (Figure D, curves b′ and c′), and the presence of variable concentrations of the nicking enzyme (Figure E, curves d′ and e′). The predicted results were validated experimentally (dots b and c, Figure D) and dots d and e, Figure E; for the raw experimental curves, see Figure S15). Very good agreement between the computationally predicted transient and the experimental results is demonstrated.
Figure 3

(A) Schematic drawing of the reaction module activating the transient formation and depletion of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme composed of subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated upon the cleavage of S1 by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme formed at time-intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, and (g) 8 h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme upon using the kinetic model of the dynamic reaction module (Figure S13). Experimental and fitted results correspond to the reaction module consisting of: [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM, and [L3′] = 5 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior of the reaction module in state III, under different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L3′] = 3 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence of [L3′] = 7 μM. All other conditions are as stated in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); curves d/d′, computationally predicted results (solid line, d′) and experimentally validated results (dots, d) in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.023 μM; curves e/e′, computationally predicted results (solid line, e′) and experimentally validated results (dots, e) in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C).

(A) Schematic drawing of the reaction module activating the transient formation and depletion of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme composed of subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated upon the cleavage of S1 by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme formed at time-intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, and (g) 8 h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme upon using the kinetic model of the dynamic reaction module (Figure S13). Experimental and fitted results correspond to the reaction module consisting of: [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM, and [L3′] = 5 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior of the reaction module in state III, under different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L3′] = 3 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence of [L3′] = 7 μM. All other conditions are as stated in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); curves d/d′, computationally predicted results (solid line, d′) and experimentally validated results (dots, d) in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.023 μM; curves e/e′, computationally predicted results (solid line, e′) and experimentally validated results (dots, e) in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM. All other conditions are the same as those described in (C). The successful design of two reaction modules that guide the transient operation of two different DNAzymes was then applied to develop the gated operation of the two DNAzymes, Figure . The system, state Q, consists of a mixture of the two duplexes L2/T2 and L3/T3, the G-quadruplex subunit constituents G2 and G3, strands M1 and M2, and the nicking enzyme catalyst, Nt.BbvCI. Subjecting this composite to triggers L2′ and L3′ simultaneously leads to the parallel, nongated, transient operation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, catalyzing the oxidation of ABTS2– to ABTS•– by H2O2 and the cleavage of the substrate S1, generating the fluorescence changes. The parallel transient operation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, T2/G2+G3, and of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, T3/M1+M2, are presented in Figure A (the time-dependent catalytic curves of the two DNAzymes at time intervals are shown in Figure S16). A kinetic model combing the two transient DNAzymes was formulated (Figure S17) for state Q. Using the set of rate constants (summarized in Table S4) which were derived from the fitted curves of the individual transient DNAzymes, Figure and 3, the transient dissipative curves corresponding to the parallel nongated DNAzymes were predicted, curve a′ and b′, and these are in good agreement with the experimental results. In order to achieve gated operation of the system, strand M2 was pre-engineered to include a toehold domain that could hybridize with inhibitor strand IM. Treatment of the system in state Q with inhibitor IM therefore yields the reaction module in state R where strand M2 is blocked. The L2′- and L3′-triggered separation of duplexes L2/T2 and L3/T3 leads to duplexes L2/L2′ and L3/L3′ and to separated strands T2 and T3. While T2 results in the formation of hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme as before, the T3-stimulated formation of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme is inhibited by the blocking strand. In turn, the nicking of strands L2′ and L3′ in duplexes L2/L2′ and L3/L3′, by Nt.BbvCI leads to the formation of free L2, L3 that rehybridize with T2, T3 to recover to the rest reaction module, state R. Thus, subjecting state R to triggers L2′ and L3′ leads to the gated activation of hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, yet the operation of the Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme does not occur. Figure B shows that in the presence of IM the gated transient operation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, T2/G2+G3, proceeds effectively, while the activity of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, T3/M1+M2, is almost fully blocked. Similarly, treatment of the mixture in state Q with the inhibitor strand IG (pre-engineered to block strand G2) results in the hybridization of IG with the single strand toehold sequence engineered into hairpin G2, yielding the reaction module in state S. Interacting the system in state S with the two triggers L2′ and L3′ leads to the gated operation of the transient Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, while the formation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme is inhibited, since T2 can not unlock blocked hairpin structure G2. Figure C demonstrates that the activity of the hemin/G-quadruplex is almost fully blocked, while the transient activity of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme is switched on. Two kinetic models that account for the transient gated operation of the two DNAzymes in the presence of inhibitors IM and IG were respectively formulated (Figures S18 and S19). As these models include a set of rate constants that are involved in the transient operation of the individual DNAzymes, that were computationally derived and experimentally supported, we adopted this set of rate constants and integrated them into the comprehensive kinetic model of the gated DNAzymes that include all rate constants associated with the participation of the inhibitors in the dynamic process. The kinetic models were applied computationally to the experimental results of the gated transient operation of the two DNAzymes (solid curves overlaid on the experimental dots, Figure ). The sets of rate constants corresponding to the set of reactions associated with the kinetic models are summarized in Tables S5 and S6. These sets of rate constants were used to predict the performance of the gated DNAzyme systems at auxiliary conditions that differ from those applied to derive Figure . The predicted results at different auxiliary conditions and the experimental validation of the predicted results, are presented in Figures S20 and S21 and the accompanying discussion.
Figure 4

Schematic representation of the gated transient operation of two DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, the hemin/G-quadruplex; DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). State Q presents the nongated reaction module consisting of the duplexes L2/T2, L3/T3, and the constituents G2, G3, M1, and M2. Hemin and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI are also present. Subjecting state Q to the triggers L2′ and L3′ leads to the simultaneous transient dynamic formation of DNAzymes 1 and 2. Treatment of state Q with the inhibitor IM blocks the constituent M2, leading to the reaction module in state R. Triggering state R with L2′ and L3′ results in the selective transient formation and depletion of DNAzyme 1 only, while the formation of DNAzyme 2 is blocked. Treatment of state Q with inhibitor IG results in the blockage of the constituent G2, leading to the gated transient activation of DNAzyme 2 only, while the formation of DNAzyme 1 is inhibited.

Figure 5

Time-dependent concentration changes of the DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex, and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, upon (A) operation of the nongated reaction mixture in state Q, (B) IM blockage of DNAzyme 2 by the inhibitor-guided transition of state Q to state R and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme 1, and (C) IG-induced blockage of DNAzyme 1 by the inhibitor-guided transition of state Q to state S and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme 2. In all curves i/i′, the transient dots (i) correspond to experimental results, and the overlaid solid curves i′ correspond to the computationally simulated concentrations of the respective DNAzymes, using the kinetic models formulated in Figures S17–S19. The experimental conditions of the system are as follows: [L2/T2] = 1 μM, [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM, [G3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, [L2′] = 4 μM, [L3′] = 5 μM, [IM] = 2 μM (only state R), and [IG] = 2 μM (only state S).

Schematic representation of the gated transient operation of two DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, the hemin/G-quadruplex; DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). State Q presents the nongated reaction module consisting of the duplexes L2/T2, L3/T3, and the constituents G2, G3, M1, and M2. Hemin and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI are also present. Subjecting state Q to the triggers L2′ and L3′ leads to the simultaneous transient dynamic formation of DNAzymes 1 and 2. Treatment of state Q with the inhibitor IM blocks the constituent M2, leading to the reaction module in state R. Triggering state R with L2′ and L3′ results in the selective transient formation and depletion of DNAzyme 1 only, while the formation of DNAzyme 2 is blocked. Treatment of state Q with inhibitor IG results in the blockage of the constituent G2, leading to the gated transient activation of DNAzyme 2 only, while the formation of DNAzyme 1 is inhibited. Time-dependent concentration changes of the DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex, and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, upon (A) operation of the nongated reaction mixture in state Q, (B) IM blockage of DNAzyme 2 by the inhibitor-guided transition of state Q to state R and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme 1, and (C) IG-induced blockage of DNAzyme 1 by the inhibitor-guided transition of state Q to state S and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme 2. In all curves i/i′, the transient dots (i) correspond to experimental results, and the overlaid solid curves i′ correspond to the computationally simulated concentrations of the respective DNAzymes, using the kinetic models formulated in Figures S17–S19. The experimental conditions of the system are as follows: [L2/T2] = 1 μM, [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM, [G3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, [L2′] = 4 μM, [L3′] = 5 μM, [IM] = 2 μM (only state R), and [IG] = 2 μM (only state S). Besides the gated operation of the two transient DNAzymes, the cascaded operation of the two DNAzymes was achieved. Figure depicts the scheme developed to intercommunicate between two reaction modules that allows the Nt.BbvCI-catalyzed operation of the DNAzyme cascade consisting of the hemin/G-quadruplex and Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzymes. The system is composed of two reaction modules: modules I and II. Module I includes duplexes L4/T4 and G4/C4 and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI in its rest state. Module II includes duplex L3/T3, the subunits M3 and M4 and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI in its rest state. The triggered activation of module I by L4′ displaces duplex L4/T4 to yield L4/L4′, and the released T4 displaces duplex G4/C4 to yield duplex T4/C4 and to release strand G4 that self-assembles into G-quadruplex-based DNAzyme 1. The nicking of strand L4′ in duplex L4/L4′ separate L4 that displaces intermediate duplex T4/C4 to yield energetically stabilized L4/T4, and the released C4 acts as functional unit to separate G-quadruplex and regenerate the reaction module. That is, the L4′-triggered dynamic operation of module I includes the machinery necessary to regenerate the rest of module I. Concomitant to this transient dynamic path, the transiently formed G-quadruplex product includes, however, the encoded information, i.e., extended single-strand tether y that acts as functional unit, to interact with module II and to activate the transient cascaded DNAzyme. In parallel to the dynamic process proceeding in module I, tether y, associated with the G-quadruplex, displaces duplex L3/T3 associated with module II to yield duplex G4/L3 and free strand T3. The released strand T3 bridges subunits M3 and M4 to self-assemble the supramolecular Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme that cleaves the fluorophore-quencher-modified substrate, S1. Tether y of G4, hybridized in duplex G4/L3, includes, however, the sequence to be nicked by Nt.BbvCI, and the cleavage of G4 yields fragment G4–2 and releases strand L3. The released strand L3 displaces strand T3 associated with Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, resulting in the dynamic transient separation of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme 2 and the regeneration of the rest state of module II. The released “waste” strand product, G4–2, generated upon the cleavage of duplex G4/L3 includes, in its free tether, the engineered sequence x that includes the capacity to displace intermediate duplex T4/C4 of module I to yield duplex G4–2/C4, thereby cooperatively assisting the transient recovery of the rest of module I by depleting the intermediate, dynamically generated component formed in module I. That is, the L4′-triggered coupling of modules I and II leads to the dynamic transient cascaded activation of two DNAzymes: the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme (in module I) and Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme (in module II). The catalytic oxidation of ABTS2– to ABTS•– (λ = 420 nm) by the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, at different time-intervals during the operation of the transient cascades (Figure A) and the time-dependent fluorescence changes associated with the cleavage of the substrate S1 by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, at different time-intervals of the transient catalytic cascade (Figure B), provide readout signals for the biocatalytic cascade. Using the appropriate calibration curves (Figure S22), the transient concentrations corresponding to the formation and depletion of the catalytic DNAzymes 1 and 2 were evaluated (Figure C, dots, curves a and b). A kinetic model that accounts for the transient cascaded DNAzyme system was formulated (Figure S23). This kinetic model includes a set of rate constants that are associated with the individual DNAzyme previously computationally and experimentally supported and add rate constants associated with the dynamic communication between the two cascaded reaction modules (Table S7). The integrated kinetic model was then applied to computationally fit the experimental transients of the DNAzymes participating in the two-enzymes cascade. The computational transient curves are overlaid on the experimental results (solid line curves a′ and b′, Figure C).
Figure 6

Schematic illustration of the assembly of a dynamic transient cascade of two DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex, and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). The cascaded process is activated by intercommunication of two transient operating modules: modules I and II.

Figure 7

(A) Time-dependent absorbance changes generated by DNAzyme 1, the hemin/G-quadruplex, at time intervals of operation of the two-enzyme cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.3 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 8 h, (h) 10 h, (i) 14 h, (j) 20 h, and (k) 24 h. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme formed in the system at different time-intervals of operation of the dynamic transient biocatalytic cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 8 h, and (h) 10 h. (C) Transient concentrations corresponding to DNAzyme 1, curve a, transient dots; DNAzyme 2, curve b, transient dots. The overlaid solid lines (curves a′ and b′) correspond to the computationally simulated results using the kinetic model formulated in Figure S23, and the resulting rate constants are summarized in Table S7. The transient concentrations of the respective DNAzyme were evaluated from the time-dependent absorbance/fluorescence changes generated by the two DNAzymes on applying the respective calibration curves. The reaction modules used for the cascaded DNAzyme process included [L4/T4] = 2 μM, [G4/C4] = 2 μM, [hemin] = 2 μM, [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M3] = 1 μM, [M4] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, [L4′] = 6 μM.

Schematic illustration of the assembly of a dynamic transient cascade of two DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex, and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). The cascaded process is activated by intercommunication of two transient operating modules: modules I and II. (A) Time-dependent absorbance changes generated by DNAzyme 1, the hemin/G-quadruplex, at time intervals of operation of the two-enzyme cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.3 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 8 h, (h) 10 h, (i) 14 h, (j) 20 h, and (k) 24 h. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme formed in the system at different time-intervals of operation of the dynamic transient biocatalytic cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 8 h, and (h) 10 h. (C) Transient concentrations corresponding to DNAzyme 1, curve a, transient dots; DNAzyme 2, curve b, transient dots. The overlaid solid lines (curves a′ and b′) correspond to the computationally simulated results using the kinetic model formulated in Figure S23, and the resulting rate constants are summarized in Table S7. The transient concentrations of the respective DNAzyme were evaluated from the time-dependent absorbance/fluorescence changes generated by the two DNAzymes on applying the respective calibration curves. The reaction modules used for the cascaded DNAzyme process included [L4/T4] = 2 μM, [G4/C4] = 2 μM, [hemin] = 2 μM, [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M3] = 1 μM, [M4] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, [L4′] = 6 μM.

Conclusion

The study introduced synthetic systems driving the transient operation of G-quadruplexes, a dynamic gated system of transient DNAzymes, and a transient cascaded system of DNAzymes. Realizing the significance of dynamic formation and depletion of G-quadruplexes in controlling the replication and transcription of genes and the consequences of malfunctions of this process in causing diseases, the present study introduces synthetic modules to form and separate G-quadruplexes. In fact, substantial efforts are directed to develop methods to form and unwind G-quadruplexes[76,77] as therapeutic means to fight G-quadruplex related diseases. Metal ions,[78] complexes,[79,80] photoresponsive ligands,[81,82] and natural polyamines such as spermine[83] were used to control G-quadruplexes stability and topology. In this context, coupling functional DNA machineries to G-quadruplex structures as a means to dissipatively perturb G-quadruplex structures could provide a versatile path for the spatiotemporal regulation of G-quadruplexes. The different systems described in the study operated, however, in homogeneous buffer solutions. As future applications of such networks are envisaged for therapeutic applications, the use of the artificial networks in native bioenvironments is an important goal. Indeed, G-quadruplexes and Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzymes were suggested as catalytic agents for cancer therapy.[84−86] Thus, toward the possible use of such artificial networks in native media, we examined the operation of the transient network displayed in Figure in a cancer cell lysate. The results and the accompanying discussion are presented in Figure S24. We find that the transient system shown in Figure successfully operates in the cell lysate, yet the cell lysate affects the dynamics of the transient process as compared to the pure buffer solution. We find that the activity of nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI is lowered by ca. 25% in the cell lysate, and this results in a slightly elevated peak content of transient complex T2/G2+G3 and a slower recovery of the parent reaction module. Nonetheless, the results indicate the feasibility to operate such artificial networks in native environments.

Experimental Section

Oligonucleotides

Oligonucleotides were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. The following sequence strands (5′ → 3′) were used to construct the different systems: (1) G1, TTTGGGTAGGGCGGGTTGGG; (2) C1: CATCAATCCCAACCCGTCCTACC; (3) T1, TTTTTTTTTTATAGGACGGGTTAGGATTGAT; (4) L1, TTTTTTTTTCAATCCTACCCGTCCTATA; (5) L1′, CGGGTAG; (6) G2, TACAGCTCCTAGTTTAGCCGCCATGGGTAGGGCGGG; (7) G3, TTGGGTAGAGATGCTGC; (8) T2, GCAGCATCTCTTGGCGGCTAAACT; (9) L2, AGTTTAGCCAAGAGATGCTGC; (10) L2′, TCTTGGCT; (11) IG, CTAAACTAGGAGCTGTA; (12) S1, FAM-ACTGAATrAGGCTGGA-BHQ1; (13) M1, ACAGAAGAACCGGCTG; (14) M2, CAGCCGCCATCACAAAGGAAAGAGGCAGG; (15) T3, GGTTTGTGATGGACGTTCTTCTGTC; (16) L3, GACAGAAGAACCCATCACAAACC; (17) L3′, GATGGGTT; (18) IM, CCTGCCTCTTTCCTTTG; (19) Cy3-labeled L3, Cy3-GACAGAAGAACCCATCACAAACC; (20) BHQ2-labeled L3′, GATGGGTT-BHQ2; (21) G4, GATGGCCTCAGCGTTTGGGTAGGGCGGGTTGGG; (22) C4, CATGTTCCCGCCCTTTCCAAACGCT; (23) T4, GTTTGGAATGGGCAGGAACATGT; (24) L4, ACATGTTCCTGCCCATTCCAAA; (25) L4′, TGGGCAGG; (26) M3, ACAGAAGAACCGGCTG; (27) M4, CAGCCGCCATCACAAA. The sequences for folding into G-quadruplex are underlined. Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme sequences are underlined in italics. The ribonucleobase cleavage site, rA, in the substrate S1 is presented in bold. The sequence domains recognized by Nt.BbvCI are indicated in bold italics.

Preparation and Measurement of Transient, Dissipative DNAzyme Systems

The composition and characterization of the different systems discussed in the paper are detailed in the Supporting Information. As an example, the composition and operation of the cascaded system presented in Figures and 7 are described in brief below, and further details are presented in the Supporting Information. The cascaded system consisted of a mixture of T4/L4 (2 μM), G4/C4 (2 μM), T3/L3 (1 μM), M3 (1 μM), M4 (1 μM), Nt.BbvCI (0.069 μM), and hemin (2 μM) in 1× rCutSmart Buffer, with a total volume of 1.0 mL. Upon adding trigger L4′ (6 μM) to the mixture (0 h time point), the dissipative system was incubated at 33 °C. For the measurement of the time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– catalyzed by hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme in the cascaded system, 40 μL aliquots of the mixture were withdrawn at different time intervals. Each aliquot was mixed with 20 μL of ABTS2– (1 mM) and 20 μL of H2O2 (1 mM) in a quartz cuvette with 10 mm path length. The time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– at 420 nm (ε = 36 000/M·cm) were recorded at 25 °C on a UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu). For the measurement of the time-dependent fluorescence changes of the cleavage of S1 catalyzed by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme in the cascaded system, aliquots of 50 μL were withdrawn at different time intervals and treated with 50 μL of S1 (2 μM, supplemented with 10 mM Mg2+). The time-dependent fluorescence changes (λex = 496 nm, λem = 516 nm) of S1 were monitored using a plastic cuvette with 10 mm path length at 25 °C on a Cary Eclipse Fluorometer (Varian, Inc.).
  79 in total

1.  Direct evidence for a G-quadruplex in a promoter region and its targeting with a small molecule to repress c-MYC transcription.

Authors:  Adam Siddiqui-Jain; Cory L Grand; David J Bearss; Laurence H Hurley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Amplified aptamer-based assay through catalytic recycling of the analyte.

Authors:  Chun-Hua Lu; Juan Li; Mei-Hua Lin; Yi-Wei Wang; Huang-Hao Yang; Xi Chen; Guo-Nan Chen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 3.  NAD(+)-dependent DNA ligase: a novel target waiting for the right inhibitor.

Authors:  Namrata Dwivedi; Divya Dube; Jyoti Pandey; Biswajit Singh; Vandna Kukshal; Ravishankar Ramachandran; Rama Pati Tripathi
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.944

4.  FANCJ helicase defective in Fanconia anemia and breast cancer unwinds G-quadruplex DNA to defend genomic stability.

Authors:  Yuliang Wu; Kazuo Shin-ya; Robert M Brosh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Triplex DNA Nanostructures: From Basic Properties to Applications.

Authors:  Yuwei Hu; Alessandro Cecconello; Andrea Idili; Francesco Ricci; Itamar Willner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  DNA Quadruple Helices in Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Mergny; Dipankar Sen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Integration of Switchable DNA-Based Hydrogels with Surfaces by the Hybridization Chain Reaction.

Authors:  Jason S Kahn; Alexander Trifonov; Alessandro Cecconello; Weiwei Guo; Chunhai Fan; Itamar Willner
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Nicking-Assisted Reactant Recycle To Implement Entropy-Driven DNA Circuit.

Authors:  Cheng Zhang; Zhiyu Wang; Yan Liu; Jing Yang; Xinxin Zhang; Yifan Li; Linqiang Pan; Yonggang Ke; Hao Yan
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Dissipative Constitutional Dynamic Networks for Tunable Transient Responses and Catalytic Functions.

Authors:  Shan Wang; Liang Yue; Verena Wulf; Sivan Lilienthal; Itamar Willner
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Imaging of Cancer Cells and Dictated Cytotoxicity Using Aptamer-Guided Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR)-Generated G-Quadruplex Chains.

Authors:  Amily Fang-Ju Jou; Yi-Te Chou; Itamar Willner; Ja-An Annie Ho
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 15.336

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.