The dynamic transient formation and depletion of G-quadruplexes regulate gene replication and transcription. This process was found to be related to various diseases such as cancer and premature aging. We report on the engineering of nucleic acid modules revealing dynamic, transient assembly and disassembly of G-quadruplex structures and G-quadruplex-based DNAzymes, gated transient processes, and cascaded dynamic transient reactions that involve G-quadruplex and DNAzyme structures. The dynamic transient processes are driven by functional DNA reaction modules activated by a fuel strand and guided toward dissipative operation by a nicking enzyme (Nt.BbvCI). The dynamic networks were further characterized by computational simulation of the experiments using kinetic models, allowing us to predict the dynamic performance of the networks under different auxiliary conditions applied to the systems. The systems reported herein could provide functional DNA machineries for the spatiotemporal control of G-quadruplex structures perturbing gene expression and thus provide a therapeutic means for related emergent diseases.
The dynamic transient formation and depletion of G-quadruplexes regulate gene replication and transcription. This process was found to be related to various diseases such as cancer and premature aging. We report on the engineering of nucleic acid modules revealing dynamic, transient assembly and disassembly of G-quadruplex structures and G-quadruplex-based DNAzymes, gated transient processes, and cascaded dynamic transient reactions that involve G-quadruplex and DNAzyme structures. The dynamic transient processes are driven by functional DNA reaction modules activated by a fuel strand and guided toward dissipative operation by a nicking enzyme (Nt.BbvCI). The dynamic networks were further characterized by computational simulation of the experiments using kinetic models, allowing us to predict the dynamic performance of the networks under different auxiliary conditions applied to the systems. The systems reported herein could provide functional DNA machineries for the spatiotemporal control of G-quadruplex structures perturbing gene expression and thus provide a therapeutic means for related emergent diseases.
Entities:
Keywords:
DNA nanotechnology; DNA network; G-quadruplex; dissipative; machinery; nicking enzyme; out-of-equilibrium
Different biological
processes such as cell proliferation,[1,2] cell motility,[3,4] and signal promotion[5] represent spatiotemporal
reactions proceeding
under dissipative, out-of-equilibrium conditions. Substantial recent
research efforts are directed toward the development of synthetic
systems emulating such processes. For example, the GTP-driven growth
and division of protein fibrils in coacervated droplets was suggested
as a model system mimicking spatiotemporal cell division.[6] Also, the dissipative carbodiimide-fueled synthesis
of anhydrides[7] and the transient assembly
and disassembly of fibers by the catalyzed hydrolysis of peptides[8] were demonstrated in systems operating out-of-equilibrium.Within these efforts, the information encoded in nucleic acids
provides versatile means to assemble spatiotemporal reaction networks
and circuitries. The possibilities to control duplex strand displacement
processes by fuel/antifuel strands dictated by the stability of the
duplexes,[9,10] the reconfiguration of triplex nucleic acids
through strand displacement or auxiliary triggers,[11] e.g., pH, the use of photoisomerizable intercalators, such
as trans/cis-azobenzene, to assemble/disassemble
nucleic acid duplexes,[12−14] and the many available enzymes to cleave or ligate
nucleic acids, such as endonucleases,[15,16] nickases,[17] exonucleases,[18,19] DNAase,[20] ligase,[21−23] or biocatalytic nucleic acids
(DNAzymes),[24−28] provide a rich arsenal of functional reconfiguration motives. Besides
using these molecular tools to design DNA-based switches[29] and machines,[30−35] dynamic networks and circuitries, such as a synthetic transcriptional
clock,[36] transcriptional oscillators,[37] bistable transcriptional switches,[38] and transcriptional regulatory networks[39] were demonstrated. Also, wired small DNA templates
were cascaded to yield dynamically controlled oscillatory outputs,[40] and the dynamic out-of-equilibrium operations
of such systems have been suggested to mimic natural ecosystems.[41] In particular, DNA reaction modules operating
transient, out-of-equilibrium, processes were recently developed.
For example, the formation of a ligand-aptamer complex, e.g., the
AMP-aptamer complex, and its subsequent biocatalytic separation resulted
in the assembly and dynamic depletion of an aptamer-ligand complex
as a reaction intermediate.[42] In addition,
different enzymes such as endonucleases,[43] nicking enzymes,[44] or synthetic catalytic
nucleic acids, DNAzymes,[45] were applied
as catalysts to control the dynamic transient reconfiguration of DNA
networks that stimulate the assembly and dissipative depletion of
DNA structures. Biocatalytically driven gated transient systems and
dissipative cascades[44] were demonstrated,
and the ATP-fueled transient ligation of DNAzyme subunits to yield
catalytic DNAzymes was reported.[46] In addition,
the biocatalytically driven transient reconfiguration of constitutional
dynamic networks was reported,[47] and a
dynamic transient feedback driven DNA network effecting the synthesis
of oligonucleotides was coupled to giant membrane vesicles, thus acting
as a protocell.[48] The triggered formation
and dissipation of the biopolymer intermediate demonstrated signal-responsive
adaptive properties of the protocell, mimicking cellular homeostasis.
Different applications of transient DNA networks were suggested, such
as the temporary uptake and release of loads[49,50] and the transient control over the optical properties of nucleic
acid functionalized Au nanoparticles, semiconductor quantum dots or
metal nanoclusters through their transient aggregation and disaggregation.[51]G-quadruplexes attract substantial research
interest as functional
reconfigurable nucleic acid based structures. DNA switches[52−55] and machines[56−60] relying on the reconfiguration of G-quadruplexes and the switchable
catalytic activities of hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzymes,[61] have been a subject of extensive research. Different applications
of reconfigurable G-quadruplex nanostructures were addressed including
their use as reversible gating units of drug-loaded carriers,[62,63] functional units controlling the stiffness of hydrogel matrices
for shape-memory and controlled drug release,[64,65] and the self-organization of photodynamic therapeutic agents.[66,67] The dynamic transient formation and depletion of G-quadruplexes
regulate the replication and transcription of genes,[68−73] and the dynamic folding of G-quadruplexes was found to be important
in the telomerase-stimulated synthesis of telomeres.[74] Indeed, perturbing the folding and unfolding dynamics of
G-quadruplexes was found to be related to various human diseases caused
by genomic instability, such as premature aging and cancer.[75] Realizing that G-quadruplexes are unfolded in
nature by helicase and that helicase efficiency could affect the spatiotemporal
formation and disassembly of G-quadruplexes leading to these respective
biological disorders, the development of synthetic dynamic routes
to form and unwind G-quadruplexes could provide a therapeutic means
for G-quadruplex-related diseases.In the present study, we
introduce nucleic acid systems demonstrating
the dynamic transient assembly/disassembly and operation of G-quadruplex
structures. We discuss means to control the dynamic processes by auxiliary
stimuli, such as the concentrations of the triggering stimuli and
the accompanying biocatalysts and strategies to guide the dynamic
transitions of the systems by controlling the effects of inhibitors
on the gating of the process. In particular, we demonstrate the integration
of the dynamic reconfiguration of the G-quadruplex within a cascaded
transformation involving information transfer and dynamic intercommunication
between two dissipative transient systems.
Results and Discussion
Figure A depicts
the transient assembly of a hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme structure.
The reaction module, state I, includes two duplexes, L1/T1 and G1/C1, and nicking enzyme
Nt.BbvCI, which acts as catalyst that controls the transient dissipative
process. Hemin is added as an auxiliary effector to the reaction module.
The strand G1 in the duplex G1/C1 consists of a guanosine-rich sequence that under appropriate conditions
can assemble into a G-quadruplex. Subjecting the reaction module to
trigger L1′ displaces duplex L1/T1 to yield duplex L1/L1′. The
released strand T1 displaces duplex G1/C1 to yield duplex T1/C1 while releasing
the strand G1 that assembles in the presence of K+ ions and hemin into the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. Duplex L1/L1′ is engineered to be cleaved by nicking
enzyme Nt.BbvCI resulting in the cleavage of L1′
and the separation of L1. The released strand L1 then displaces duplex T1/C1, releasing C1 which disassembles the G-quadruplex through duplex formation
to regenerate the initial reaction module, state I. Thus, the dynamic
events proceeding in the network lead to the transient assembly and
dissipative depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. The hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme catalyzed oxidation of 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic
acid) (ABTS2–) to the colored ABTS•– (λ = 420 nm) in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), provides a readout signal for the transient formation
and depletion of the DNAzyme. Figure B depicts the time-dependent absorbance changes of
ABTS•– formation by the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme at different time intervals of the transient dynamic operation
of the dissipative machinery shown in Figure A. Using an appropriate calibration curve,
relating the time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– to known standard concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, Figure S1, the transient concentration changes
of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme were derived (Figure C, dots). A kinetics model that accounts
for the different steps involved in the transient process was formulated
(Figure S2) and solved computationally
to determine the rate constants that describe the experimental results.
The best-fit curve overlaying the experimental result is shown in Figure C (curve a′).
The derived computational rate constants are summarized in Table S1. For a detailed description of the procedure
for the computational simulations presented in the study, see the Supporting Information, page S6. The computationally
simulated results are valuable to predict behavior of the system under
different auxiliary experimental conditions. Realizing that the dynamic
experiments shown in Figure C were obtained in the presence of L1′ (4
μM) and Nt.BbvCI (0.046 μM), the derived transient behavior
of the system at two concentrations of L1′ (2 and
6 μM) and a constant concentration of Nt.BbvCI (0.046 μM)
were displayed in curves b′ and c′ (Figure D). The predicted dynamic
behavior was then experimentally validated, as shown with dots in
curves b and c. Similarly, Figure E depicts curve d′ that predicts the transient
behavior of the system in the presence of a higher concentration of
the nicking enzyme (0.069 μM) and L1′ (4 μM),
and the dots (curve d) represent the experimental validation of the
predicted curve. (For the experimental raw data leading to the results
displayed in Figure D,E, see Figure S3.) Very good agreement
between the predicted transient dynamic kinetics patterns of the systems
at different auxiliary conditions and the experimental results is
demonstrated, indicating the success of the computational modeling
of the kinetics of the complex dynamic machinery. The formation and
depletion of the G-quadruplex in the system was further supported
by circular dichroism (CD) experiments (see Figure S4 and the accompanying discussion). In addition, the transient
operation of the system shown in Figure was further supported by quantitative gel
electrophoretic experiments following the transient depletion and
recovery of constituents L1/T1 and G1/C1 (see Figure S5 and the
accompanying discussion).
Figure 1
(A) Schematic illustration of the reaction module
for the transient
formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. (B) Time-dependent
absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by
the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme formed at different time-intervals
of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5
h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 12 h, and (h) 24 h. (C)
Dots, curve a; transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient
concentrations of the DNAzyme using the kinetic model of the reaction
module (Figure S2). Experimental and simulated
results correspond to the reaction module consisting of [L1/T1] = 1 μM, [G1/C1] = 1 μM,
[hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior
of the reaction module state I, under different conditions: curves
a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C);
curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line,
b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence
of [L1′] = 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally
predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated
results (dots, c) in the presence of [L1′] = 6 μM.
All other conditions are the same as those described in (C). (E) Curves
a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); solid line, curve
d′, computationally predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI]
= 0.069 μM; dots, curve d, experimentally validated results.
All other conditions are the same as those described in (C).
(A) Schematic illustration of the reaction module
for the transient
formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme. (B) Time-dependent
absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by
the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme formed at different time-intervals
of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5
h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 12 h, and (h) 24 h. (C)
Dots, curve a; transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally fitted transient
concentrations of the DNAzyme using the kinetic model of the reaction
module (Figure S2). Experimental and simulated
results correspond to the reaction module consisting of [L1/T1] = 1 μM, [G1/C1] = 1 μM,
[hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior
of the reaction module state I, under different conditions: curves
a/a′, experimental and computational results presented in (C);
curves b/b′, computationally predicted results (solid line,
b′) and experimentally validated results (dots, b) in the presence
of [L1′] = 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally
predicted results (solid line, c′) and experimentally validated
results (dots, c) in the presence of [L1′] = 6 μM.
All other conditions are the same as those described in (C). (E) Curves
a/a′ are the same as those described in (C); solid line, curve
d′, computationally predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI]
= 0.069 μM; dots, curve d, experimentally validated results.
All other conditions are the same as those described in (C).A second reaction module demonstrating the transient
dynamic assembly
of a supramolecular hemin/G-quadruplex, consisting of two G subunits,
is depicted in Figure A. The reaction module in state II is composed of duplex L2/T2, hairpin structure G2, and single-strand
G3 as constituents, nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI as the participating
catalyst, and hemin as the DNAzyme cofactor. Strands G2 and G3 include guanosine-rich sequences (blue) that act
as subunits that assemble, under appropriate conditions, into the
hemin/G-quadruplex supramolecular DNAzyme. Subjecting the reaction
module in state II to trigger strand L2′ displaces
duplex L2/T2 to yield L2/L2′, and the released strand, T2, opens hairpin G2 while simultaneously bridging the strands G2/G3 and promoting their self-assembly into the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme. Duplex L2/L2′ is, however, engineered
to include the nicking site in strand L2′ to be
cleaved by Nt.BbvCI. Cleavage of L2′ leads to the
release of L2 that displaces strand T2 from
supramolecular complex T2/G2+G3,
leading to separation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme and to the
eventual recovery of the rest module in state II. Thus, the network
displayed in Figure A leads to the dynamic, transient formation and depletion of the
supramolecular hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme structure. The dynamic behavior
of the system was probed by the DNAzyme-catalyzed oxidation of ABTS2– to ABTS•–. Figure B depicts the time-dependent
absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by
the dynamically formed hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme samples after different
time intervals following the activation of the transient system. Using
an appropriate calibration curve, relating the time-dependent absorbance
changes of ABTS•– to known concentrations
of the supramolecular hemin/G-quadruplex (Figure S6), the concentrations of the transiently formed and depleted
DNAzyme complex T2/G2+G3 were evaluated, Figure C (dotted profile).
The full absorption spectra of ABTS•– generated
after a fixed time interval of 100 s by the samples withdrawn at differed
time intervals following the activation of the transient system are
presented in Figure S7A. The full absorption
spectra of ABTS•– generated after 100 s by
known concentrations of the DNAzyme T2/G2+G3 are presented in Figure S7B. The
absorbance values at λ = 420 nm were used to derive a respective
calibration curve (Figure S7C), following
which the absorbance values recorded for the transient samples at
λ = 420 nm, ε = 36 000 /(M·cm) (Figure S7A), enabled the derivation of the transient
concentrations of T2/G2+G3 generated
in the transient system (Figure S7D). The
kinetic model corresponding to the transient scheme depicted in Figure A was formulated
(Figure S8). The computationally simulated
kinetic curve is presented as the solid curve (red) overlaid on the
experimental data, Figure C. The derived rate constants (Table S2) were then used to predict the behavior of the network at different
auxiliary conditions, and the predicted results were experimentally
validated (curves b/b′, c/c′, and d/d′ in Figure D,E; the raw results
are displayed in Figure S9). The formation
and depletion of the supramolecular G-quadruplex in the system was
further supported by CD experiments (see Figure S10 and the accompanying discussion). Additionally, the transient
operation of the system was supported by quantitative gel electrophoretic
experiments following the transient depletion and recovery of the
constituents L2/T2, Figure S11 and the accompanying discussion.
Figure 2
(A) Schematic diagram
of the reaction module leading to the transient
formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme composed
of two subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by the hemin/G-quadruplex T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme formed at different time
intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0
h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 10 h, (h) 12
h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex
T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme; solid line, curve
a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the
DNAzyme upon using the kinetic model of the reaction module (Figure S8). Experimental and fitted results correspond
to the reaction module consisting of [L2/T2]
= 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM, [G3] = 1 μM,
[hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior
of the reaction module under different conditions: curves a/a′,
experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′,
computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally
validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L2′]
= 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results
(solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots,
c) in the presence of [L2′] = 6 μM. All other
conditions are the same as those in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are
the same as those described in (C); solid curve d′, computationally
predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM;
dots, curve d, experimentally validated results. All other conditions
are the same as those described in (C).
(A) Schematic diagram
of the reaction module leading to the transient
formation and depletion of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme composed
of two subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– generated by the hemin/G-quadruplex T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme formed at different time
intervals of the transient operation of the reaction module: (a) 0
h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 10 h, (h) 12
h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of the hemin/G-quadruplex
T2/G2+G3 DNAzyme; solid line, curve
a′, computationally fitted transient concentrations of the
DNAzyme upon using the kinetic model of the reaction module (Figure S8). Experimental and fitted results correspond
to the reaction module consisting of [L2/T2]
= 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM, [G3] = 1 μM,
[hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, and [L1′] = 4 μM. (D) Characterization of the transient behavior
of the reaction module under different conditions: curves a/a′,
experimental and computational results presented in (C); curves b/b′,
computationally predicted results (solid line, b′) and experimentally
validated results (dots, b) in the presence of [L2′]
= 2 μM; curves c/c′, computationally predicted results
(solid line, c′) and experimentally validated results (dots,
c) in the presence of [L2′] = 6 μM. All other
conditions are the same as those in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are
the same as those described in (C); solid curve d′, computationally
predicted results in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.046 μM;
dots, curve d, experimentally validated results. All other conditions
are the same as those described in (C).The successful assembly of transient catalytic DNAzymes by reaction
modules consisting of appropriately engineered nucleic acid subunits
as constituents was then applied to design reaction modules enabling
the assembly of other transient DNAzyme nanostructures. Figure (A) introduces a reaction module,
state III, that allows the transient operation of a Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme. The reaction module consists of duplex L3/T3, the added subunits M1, M2, and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI. Upon triggering the module consisting
of state III with L3′, the duplex L3/T3 is displaced to yield the duplex L3/L3′ and the released strand T3, bridges the constituents
M1/M2 to yield Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme. Nicking the duplex L3/L3′ cleaves
L3′ and the separated strand L3 displaces
the intermediate Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme to yield the
energetically stabilized duplex L3/T3, resulting
in the recovery of the rest module in state III. The transient formation
and depletion of the intermediate T3/M1+M2 Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme was probed by withdrawing
samples from the reaction mixture at different time intervals of the
dynamic operation of the system, and stimulating Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme-induced cleavage of the fluorophore/quencher-modified substrate,
S1 (F = FAM; Q = BHQ1). The resulting time-dependent fluorescence
changes of the cleaved product, Figure B reflect the content of the catalytic Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme. By applying an appropriate calibration curve
corresponding to the rates of the fluorescence changes (λem = 516 nm) of the cleaved substrate S1 by different
known standard concentrations of the DNAzyme (Figure S12), the transient concentrations of the formed and
dissipated Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, T3/M1+M2 were evaluated, Figure C dots. A kinetic model was formulated (Figures S13 and S14 and the accompanying discussion)
for the dynamic scheme shown in Figure A, and the experimental results were simulated using
the kinetic model to yield the best-fit curve, the solid red transient Figure C. The set of rate
constants derived from the fitted curve are summarized in Table S3. As before, the derived rate constants
and kinetic model were used to predict the behavior of the transient
system, in the presence of variable concentrations of the trigger,
L3′ (Figure D, curves b′ and c′), and the presence of variable
concentrations of the nicking enzyme (Figure E, curves d′ and e′). The predicted
results were validated experimentally (dots b and c, Figure D) and dots d and e, Figure E; for the raw experimental
curves, see Figure S15). Very good agreement
between the computationally predicted transient and the experimental
results is demonstrated.
Figure 3
(A) Schematic drawing of the reaction module
activating the transient
formation and depletion of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme composed
of subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated
upon the cleavage of S1 by Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme formed at time-intervals of the transient operation of the
reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f)
6 h, and (g) 8 h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally
fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme upon using the kinetic
model of the dynamic reaction module (Figure S13). Experimental and fitted results correspond to the reaction module
consisting of: [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] =
0.046 μM, and [L3′] = 5 μM. (D) Characterization
of the transient behavior of the reaction module in state III, under
different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational
results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted
results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results
(dots, b) in the presence of [L3′] = 3 μM;
curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line,
c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence
of [L3′] = 7 μM. All other conditions are
as stated in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described
in (C); curves d/d′, computationally predicted results (solid
line, d′) and experimentally validated results (dots, d) in
the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.023 μM; curves e/e′, computationally
predicted results (solid line, e′) and experimentally validated
results (dots, e) in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM.
All other conditions are the same as those described in (C).
(A) Schematic drawing of the reaction module
activating the transient
formation and depletion of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme composed
of subunit strands. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence changes generated
upon the cleavage of S1 by Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme formed at time-intervals of the transient operation of the
reaction module: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f)
6 h, and (g) 8 h. (C) Dots, curve a, transient concentrations of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme; solid line, curve a′, computationally
fitted transient concentrations of the DNAzyme upon using the kinetic
model of the dynamic reaction module (Figure S13). Experimental and fitted results correspond to the reaction module
consisting of: [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] =
0.046 μM, and [L3′] = 5 μM. (D) Characterization
of the transient behavior of the reaction module in state III, under
different conditions: curves a/a′, experimental and computational
results presented in (C); curves b/b′, computationally predicted
results (solid line, b′) and experimentally validated results
(dots, b) in the presence of [L3′] = 3 μM;
curves c/c′, computationally predicted results (solid line,
c′) and experimentally validated results (dots, c) in the presence
of [L3′] = 7 μM. All other conditions are
as stated in (C). (E) Curves a/a′ are the same as those described
in (C); curves d/d′, computationally predicted results (solid
line, d′) and experimentally validated results (dots, d) in
the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.023 μM; curves e/e′, computationally
predicted results (solid line, e′) and experimentally validated
results (dots, e) in the presence of [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM.
All other conditions are the same as those described in (C).The successful design of two reaction modules that
guide the transient
operation of two different DNAzymes was then applied to develop the
gated operation of the two DNAzymes, Figure . The system, state Q, consists of a mixture
of the two duplexes L2/T2 and L3/T3, the G-quadruplex subunit constituents G2 and
G3, strands M1 and M2, and the nicking
enzyme catalyst, Nt.BbvCI. Subjecting this composite to triggers L2′ and L3′ simultaneously leads to
the parallel, nongated, transient operation of the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme, catalyzing the oxidation of ABTS2– to ABTS•– by H2O2 and the cleavage
of the substrate S1, generating the fluorescence changes.
The parallel transient operation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme,
T2/G2+G3, and of Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme, T3/M1+M2, are presented
in Figure A (the time-dependent
catalytic curves of the two DNAzymes at time intervals are shown in Figure S16). A kinetic model combing the two
transient DNAzymes was formulated (Figure S17) for state Q. Using the set of rate constants (summarized in Table S4) which were derived from the fitted
curves of the individual transient DNAzymes, Figure and 3, the transient
dissipative curves corresponding to the parallel nongated DNAzymes
were predicted, curve a′ and b′, and these are in good
agreement with the experimental results. In order to achieve gated
operation of the system, strand M2 was pre-engineered to
include a toehold domain that could hybridize with inhibitor strand
IM. Treatment of the system in state Q with inhibitor IM therefore yields the reaction module in state R where strand
M2 is blocked. The L2′- and L3′-triggered separation of duplexes L2/T2 and L3/T3 leads to duplexes L2/L2′ and L3/L3′ and to separated
strands T2 and T3. While T2 results
in the formation of hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme as before, the T3-stimulated formation of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme
is inhibited by the blocking strand. In turn, the nicking of strands
L2′ and L3′ in duplexes L2/L2′ and L3/L3′,
by Nt.BbvCI leads to the formation of free L2, L3 that rehybridize with T2, T3 to recover to
the rest reaction module, state R. Thus, subjecting state R to triggers
L2′ and L3′ leads to the gated
activation of hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme, yet the operation of the
Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme does not occur. Figure B shows that in the presence
of IM the gated transient operation of the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme, T2/G2+G3, proceeds effectively,
while the activity of Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, T3/M1+M2, is almost fully blocked. Similarly,
treatment of the mixture in state Q with the inhibitor strand IG (pre-engineered to block strand G2) results in
the hybridization of IG with the single strand toehold
sequence engineered into hairpin G2, yielding the reaction
module in state S. Interacting the system in state S with the two
triggers L2′ and L3′ leads to
the gated operation of the transient Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme, while the formation of the hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme is
inhibited, since T2 can not unlock blocked hairpin structure
G2. Figure C demonstrates that the activity of the hemin/G-quadruplex is almost
fully blocked, while the transient activity of Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme is switched on. Two kinetic models that account for the transient
gated operation of the two DNAzymes in the presence of inhibitors
IM and IG were respectively formulated (Figures S18 and S19). As these models include
a set of rate constants that are involved in the transient operation
of the individual DNAzymes, that were computationally derived and
experimentally supported, we adopted this set of rate constants and
integrated them into the comprehensive kinetic model of the gated
DNAzymes that include all rate constants associated with the participation
of the inhibitors in the dynamic process. The kinetic models were
applied computationally to the experimental results of the gated transient
operation of the two DNAzymes (solid curves overlaid on the experimental
dots, Figure ). The
sets of rate constants corresponding to the set of reactions associated
with the kinetic models are summarized in Tables S5 and S6. These sets of rate constants were used to predict
the performance of the gated DNAzyme systems at auxiliary conditions
that differ from those applied to derive Figure . The predicted results at different auxiliary
conditions and the experimental validation of the predicted results,
are presented in Figures S20 and S21 and
the accompanying discussion.
Figure 4
Schematic representation of the gated transient
operation of two
DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, the hemin/G-quadruplex; DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). State Q presents the nongated reaction module
consisting of the duplexes L2/T2, L3/T3, and the constituents G2, G3, M1, and M2. Hemin and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI
are also present. Subjecting state Q to the triggers L2′ and L3′ leads to the simultaneous transient
dynamic formation of DNAzymes 1 and 2. Treatment of state Q with the
inhibitor IM blocks the constituent M2, leading
to the reaction module in state R. Triggering state R with L2′ and L3′ results in the selective transient
formation and depletion of DNAzyme 1 only, while the formation of
DNAzyme 2 is blocked. Treatment of state Q with inhibitor IG results in the blockage of the constituent G2, leading
to the gated transient activation of DNAzyme 2 only, while the formation
of DNAzyme 1 is inhibited.
Figure 5
Time-dependent
concentration changes of the DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex,
and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, upon (A) operation
of the nongated reaction mixture in state Q, (B) IM blockage
of DNAzyme 2 by the inhibitor-guided transition of state Q to state
R and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme 1, and (C) IG-induced blockage of DNAzyme 1 by the inhibitor-guided transition
of state Q to state S and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme
2. In all curves i/i′, the
transient dots (i) correspond to experimental results,
and the overlaid solid curves i′ correspond
to the computationally simulated concentrations of the respective
DNAzymes, using the kinetic models formulated in Figures S17–S19. The experimental conditions of the
system are as follows: [L2/T2] = 1 μM,
[L3/T3] = 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM,
[G3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM,
[L2′] = 4 μM, [L3′] = 5
μM, [IM] = 2 μM (only state R), and [IG] = 2 μM (only state S).
Schematic representation of the gated transient
operation of two
DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, the hemin/G-quadruplex; DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). State Q presents the nongated reaction module
consisting of the duplexes L2/T2, L3/T3, and the constituents G2, G3, M1, and M2. Hemin and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI
are also present. Subjecting state Q to the triggers L2′ and L3′ leads to the simultaneous transient
dynamic formation of DNAzymes 1 and 2. Treatment of state Q with the
inhibitor IM blocks the constituent M2, leading
to the reaction module in state R. Triggering state R with L2′ and L3′ results in the selective transient
formation and depletion of DNAzyme 1 only, while the formation of
DNAzyme 2 is blocked. Treatment of state Q with inhibitor IG results in the blockage of the constituent G2, leading
to the gated transient activation of DNAzyme 2 only, while the formation
of DNAzyme 1 is inhibited.Time-dependent
concentration changes of the DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex,
and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, upon (A) operation
of the nongated reaction mixture in state Q, (B) IM blockage
of DNAzyme 2 by the inhibitor-guided transition of state Q to state
R and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme 1, and (C) IG-induced blockage of DNAzyme 1 by the inhibitor-guided transition
of state Q to state S and the gated transient operation of DNAzyme
2. In all curves i/i′, the
transient dots (i) correspond to experimental results,
and the overlaid solid curves i′ correspond
to the computationally simulated concentrations of the respective
DNAzymes, using the kinetic models formulated in Figures S17–S19. The experimental conditions of the
system are as follows: [L2/T2] = 1 μM,
[L3/T3] = 1 μM, [G2] = 1 μM,
[G3] = 1 μM, [M1] = 1 μM, [M2] = 1 μM, [hemin] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM,
[L2′] = 4 μM, [L3′] = 5
μM, [IM] = 2 μM (only state R), and [IG] = 2 μM (only state S).Besides the gated operation of the two transient DNAzymes, the
cascaded operation of the two DNAzymes was achieved. Figure depicts the scheme developed
to intercommunicate between two reaction modules that allows the Nt.BbvCI-catalyzed
operation of the DNAzyme cascade consisting of the hemin/G-quadruplex
and Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzymes. The system is composed
of two reaction modules: modules I and II. Module I includes duplexes
L4/T4 and G4/C4 and nicking
enzyme Nt.BbvCI in its rest state. Module II includes duplex L3/T3, the subunits M3 and M4 and nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI in its rest state. The triggered activation
of module I by L4′ displaces duplex L4/T4 to yield L4/L4′, and
the released T4 displaces duplex G4/C4 to yield duplex T4/C4 and to release strand
G4 that self-assembles into G-quadruplex-based DNAzyme
1. The nicking of strand L4′ in duplex L4/L4′ separate L4 that displaces intermediate
duplex T4/C4 to yield energetically stabilized
L4/T4, and the released C4 acts as
functional unit to separate G-quadruplex and regenerate the reaction
module. That is, the L4′-triggered dynamic operation
of module I includes the machinery necessary to regenerate the rest
of module I. Concomitant to this transient dynamic path, the transiently
formed G-quadruplex product includes, however, the encoded information,
i.e., extended single-strand tether y that acts as
functional unit, to interact with module II and to activate the transient
cascaded DNAzyme. In parallel to the dynamic process proceeding in
module I, tether y, associated with the G-quadruplex,
displaces duplex L3/T3 associated with module
II to yield duplex G4/L3 and free strand T3. The released strand T3 bridges subunits M3 and M4 to self-assemble the supramolecular Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme that cleaves the fluorophore-quencher-modified
substrate, S1. Tether y of G4, hybridized in duplex G4/L3, includes, however,
the sequence to be nicked by Nt.BbvCI, and the cleavage of G4 yields fragment G4–2 and releases strand L3. The released strand L3 displaces strand T3 associated with Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme, resulting
in the dynamic transient separation of Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme 2 and the regeneration of the rest state of module II. The
released “waste” strand product, G4–2, generated upon the cleavage of duplex G4/L3 includes, in its free tether, the engineered sequence x that includes the capacity to displace intermediate duplex T4/C4 of module I to yield duplex G4–2/C4, thereby cooperatively assisting the transient recovery
of the rest of module I by depleting the intermediate, dynamically
generated component formed in module I. That is, the L4′-triggered coupling of modules I and II leads to the dynamic
transient cascaded activation of two DNAzymes: the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme (in module I) and Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme (in
module II). The catalytic oxidation of ABTS2– to
ABTS•– (λ = 420 nm) by the hemin/G-quadruplex
DNAzyme, at different time-intervals during the operation of the transient
cascades (Figure A)
and the time-dependent fluorescence changes associated with the cleavage
of the substrate S1 by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme,
at different time-intervals of the transient catalytic cascade (Figure B), provide readout
signals for the biocatalytic cascade. Using the appropriate calibration
curves (Figure S22), the transient concentrations
corresponding to the formation and depletion of the catalytic DNAzymes
1 and 2 were evaluated (Figure C, dots, curves a and b). A kinetic model that accounts for
the transient cascaded DNAzyme system was formulated (Figure S23). This kinetic model includes a set
of rate constants that are associated with the individual DNAzyme
previously computationally and experimentally supported and add rate
constants associated with the dynamic communication between the two
cascaded reaction modules (Table S7). The
integrated kinetic model was then applied to computationally fit the
experimental transients of the DNAzymes participating in the two-enzymes
cascade. The computational transient curves are overlaid on the experimental
results (solid line curves a′ and b′, Figure C).
Figure 6
Schematic illustration
of the assembly of a dynamic transient cascade
of two DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex, and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). The cascaded process is activated
by intercommunication of two transient operating modules: modules
I and II.
Figure 7
(A) Time-dependent absorbance changes generated
by DNAzyme 1, the
hemin/G-quadruplex, at time intervals of operation of the two-enzyme
cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.3 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g)
8 h, (h) 10 h, (i) 14 h, (j) 20 h, and (k) 24 h. (B) Time-dependent
fluorescence changes generated by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme
formed in the system at different time-intervals of operation of the
dynamic transient biocatalytic cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1
h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 8 h, and (h) 10 h. (C) Transient
concentrations corresponding to DNAzyme 1, curve a, transient dots;
DNAzyme 2, curve b, transient dots. The overlaid solid lines (curves
a′ and b′) correspond to the computationally simulated
results using the kinetic model formulated in Figure S23, and the resulting rate constants are summarized
in Table S7. The transient concentrations
of the respective DNAzyme were evaluated from the time-dependent absorbance/fluorescence
changes generated by the two DNAzymes on applying the respective calibration
curves. The reaction modules used for the cascaded DNAzyme process
included [L4/T4] = 2 μM, [G4/C4] = 2 μM, [hemin] = 2 μM, [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M3] = 1 μM, [M4] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, [L4′] = 6 μM.
Schematic illustration
of the assembly of a dynamic transient cascade
of two DNAzymes (DNAzyme 1, hemin/G-quadruplex, and DNAzyme 2, Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme). The cascaded process is activated
by intercommunication of two transient operating modules: modules
I and II.(A) Time-dependent absorbance changes generated
by DNAzyme 1, the
hemin/G-quadruplex, at time intervals of operation of the two-enzyme
cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.3 h, (c) 1 h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g)
8 h, (h) 10 h, (i) 14 h, (j) 20 h, and (k) 24 h. (B) Time-dependent
fluorescence changes generated by Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme
formed in the system at different time-intervals of operation of the
dynamic transient biocatalytic cascade: (a) 0 h, (b) 0.5 h, (c) 1
h, (d) 2 h, (e) 4 h, (f) 6 h, (g) 8 h, and (h) 10 h. (C) Transient
concentrations corresponding to DNAzyme 1, curve a, transient dots;
DNAzyme 2, curve b, transient dots. The overlaid solid lines (curves
a′ and b′) correspond to the computationally simulated
results using the kinetic model formulated in Figure S23, and the resulting rate constants are summarized
in Table S7. The transient concentrations
of the respective DNAzyme were evaluated from the time-dependent absorbance/fluorescence
changes generated by the two DNAzymes on applying the respective calibration
curves. The reaction modules used for the cascaded DNAzyme process
included [L4/T4] = 2 μM, [G4/C4] = 2 μM, [hemin] = 2 μM, [L3/T3] = 1 μM, [M3] = 1 μM, [M4] = 1 μM, [Nt.BbvCI] = 0.069 μM, [L4′] = 6 μM.
Conclusion
The
study introduced synthetic systems driving the transient operation
of G-quadruplexes, a dynamic gated system of transient DNAzymes, and
a transient cascaded system of DNAzymes. Realizing the significance
of dynamic formation and depletion of G-quadruplexes in controlling
the replication and transcription of genes and the consequences of
malfunctions of this process in causing diseases, the present study
introduces synthetic modules to form and separate G-quadruplexes.
In fact, substantial efforts are directed to develop methods to form
and unwind G-quadruplexes[76,77] as therapeutic means
to fight G-quadruplex related diseases. Metal ions,[78] complexes,[79,80] photoresponsive ligands,[81,82] and natural polyamines such as spermine[83] were used to control G-quadruplexes stability and topology. In this
context, coupling functional DNA machineries to G-quadruplex structures
as a means to dissipatively perturb G-quadruplex structures could
provide a versatile path for the spatiotemporal regulation of G-quadruplexes.
The different systems described in the study operated, however, in
homogeneous buffer solutions. As future applications of such networks
are envisaged for therapeutic applications, the use of the artificial
networks in native bioenvironments is an important goal. Indeed, G-quadruplexes
and Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzymes were suggested as catalytic
agents for cancer therapy.[84−86] Thus, toward the possible use
of such artificial networks in native media, we examined the operation
of the transient network displayed in Figure in a cancer cell lysate. The results and
the accompanying discussion are presented in Figure S24. We find that the transient system shown in Figure successfully operates in the
cell lysate, yet the cell lysate affects the dynamics of the transient
process as compared to the pure buffer solution. We find that the
activity of nicking enzyme Nt.BbvCI is lowered by ca. 25% in the cell
lysate, and this results in a slightly elevated peak content of transient
complex T2/G2+G3 and a slower recovery
of the parent reaction module. Nonetheless, the results indicate the
feasibility to operate such artificial networks in native environments.
Experimental Section
Oligonucleotides
Oligonucleotides were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich and Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. The following
sequence strands (5′ → 3′) were used to construct
the different systems: (1) G1, TTTGGGTAGGGCGGGTTGGG; (2) C1: CATCAATCCCAACCCGTCCTACC; (3) T1, TTTTTTTTTTATAGGACGGGTTAGGATTGAT; (4) L1,
TTTTTTTTTCAATCCTACCCGTCCTATA;
(5) L1′, CGGGTAG; (6) G2, TACAGCTCCTAGTTTAGCCGCCATGGGTAGGGCGGG; (7) G3, TTGGGTAGAGATGCTGC; (8) T2, GCAGCATCTCTTGGCGGCTAAACT;
(9) L2, AGTTTAGCCAAGAGATGCTGC; (10) L2′, TCTTGGCT; (11) IG, CTAAACTAGGAGCTGTA;
(12) S1, FAM-ACTGAATrAGGCTGGA-BHQ1;
(13) M1, ACAGAAGAACCGGCTG; (14) M2, CAGCCGCCATCACAAAGGAAAGAGGCAGG; (15) T3, GGTTTGTGATGGACGTTCTTCTGTC; (16) L3, GACAGAAGAACCCATCACAAACC;
(17) L3′, GATGGGTT; (18) IM, CCTGCCTCTTTCCTTTG; (19) Cy3-labeled L3, Cy3-GACAGAAGAACCCATCACAAACC; (20) BHQ2-labeled L3′, GATGGGTT-BHQ2; (21) G4, GATGGCCTCAGCGTTTGGGTAGGGCGGGTTGGG; (22) C4, CATGTTCCCGCCCTTTCCAAACGCT;
(23) T4, GTTTGGAATGGGCAGGAACATGT; (24) L4, ACATGTTCCTGCCCATTCCAAA;
(25) L4′, TGGGCAGG; (26) M3, ACAGAAGAACCGGCTG; (27) M4, CAGCCGCCATCACAAA.
The sequences for folding into G-quadruplex are underlined. Mg2+-ion-dependent DNAzyme sequences are underlined in italics.
The ribonucleobase cleavage site, rA, in the substrate S1 is presented in bold. The sequence domains recognized by Nt.BbvCI
are indicated in bold italics.
Preparation and Measurement
of Transient, Dissipative DNAzyme
Systems
The composition and characterization of the different
systems discussed in the paper are detailed in the Supporting Information. As an example, the composition and
operation of the cascaded system presented in Figures and 7 are described
in brief below, and further details are presented in the Supporting Information. The cascaded system consisted
of a mixture of T4/L4 (2 μM), G4/C4 (2 μM), T3/L3 (1 μM),
M3 (1 μM), M4 (1 μM), Nt.BbvCI (0.069
μM), and hemin (2 μM) in 1× rCutSmart Buffer, with
a total volume of 1.0 mL. Upon adding trigger L4′
(6 μM) to the mixture (0 h time point), the dissipative system
was incubated at 33 °C. For the measurement of the time-dependent
absorbance changes of ABTS•– catalyzed by
hemin/G-quadruplex DNAzyme in the cascaded system, 40 μL aliquots
of the mixture were withdrawn at different time intervals. Each aliquot
was mixed with 20 μL of ABTS2– (1 mM) and
20 μL of H2O2 (1 mM) in a quartz cuvette
with 10 mm path length. The time-dependent absorbance changes of ABTS•– at 420 nm (ε = 36 000/M·cm)
were recorded at 25 °C on a UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu).
For the measurement of the time-dependent fluorescence changes of
the cleavage of S1 catalyzed by Mg2+-ion-dependent
DNAzyme in the cascaded system, aliquots of 50 μL were withdrawn
at different time intervals and treated with 50 μL of S1 (2 μM, supplemented with 10 mM Mg2+). The
time-dependent fluorescence changes (λex = 496 nm,
λem = 516 nm) of S1 were monitored using
a plastic cuvette with 10 mm path length at 25 °C on a Cary Eclipse
Fluorometer (Varian, Inc.).