| Literature DB >> 35052583 |
Grzegorz K Jakubiak1,2, Kamila Osadnik1, Mateusz Lejawa1, Tadeusz Osadnik1, Marcin Goławski3, Piotr Lewandowski3, Natalia Pawlas1.
Abstract
Metabolic syndrome (MS) is not a homogeneous entity, but this term refers to the coexistence of factors that increase the risk for the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. There are different versions of the criteria for the diagnosis of MS, which makes the population of patients diagnosed with MS heterogeneous. Research to date shows that MS is associated with oxidative stress (OS), but it is unclear which MS component is most strongly associated with OS. The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between the parameters of OS and the presence of individual elements of MS in young adults, as well as to identify the components of MS by means of principal components analysis (PCA) and to investigate how the parameters of OS correlate with the presence of individual components. The study included 724 young adults with or without a family history of coronary heart disease (population of the MAGNETIC study). Blood samples were taken from the participants of the study to determine peripheral blood counts, biochemical parameters, and selected parameters of OS. In addition, blood pressure and anthropometric parameters were measured. In subjects with MS, significantly lower activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), copper- and zinc-containing SOD (CuZnSOD), and manganese-containing SOD (MnSOD) were found, along with significantly higher total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and significantly lower concentration of thiol groups per gram of protein (PSH). We identified three components of MS by means of PCA: "Obesity and insulin resistance", "Dyslipidemia", and "Blood pressure", and showed the component "Obesity and insulin resistance" to have the strongest relationship with OS. In conclusion, we documented significant differences in some parameters of OS between young adults with and without MS. We showed that "Obesity and insulin resistance" is the most important component of MS in terms of relationship with OS.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; dyslipidemia; hypertension; insulin resistance; metabolic syndrome; obesity; oxidative stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 35052583 PMCID: PMC8773170 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11010079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Study flowchart. Notes: * asthma or allergies (14); atopic skin disease (2); bipolar disorder or depression (3); cholelithiasis (1); chronic gastritis (1); coeliac disease (1); colitis (2); Crohn’s disease (1); diabetes mellitus (1); epilepsy (2); history of gastric ulcers (1); GERD (7); gout (2); Hashimoto’s disease and hypothyroidism (31); hypercholesterolemia treated with statins (1); hyperprolactinemia (1); hypertension (13); idiopathic purpura (1); irritable bowel syndrome (5); lactation (1); lactose intolerance (1); Marfan syndrome (1); migraines (3); nephrolithiasis (3); non-infectious hepatitis (1); polycystic ovarian disease (9); psoriasis (2); steatosis hepatitis (1); virial hepatitis (3).
The comparison of clinical and sociodemographic findings between young adult patients with and without MS.
| Variable | Total Sample | Metabolic Syndrome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| N (%) | 724 (100) | 85 (11.7) | 639 (88.3) | |
| Age [years] | 27.9 ± 4.51 | 30.91 ± 3.34 | 27.51 ± 4.49 | <0.0001 |
| Current vs. never and former smoking (%) | 157 (21.9) | 26 (31.0) | 131 (20.7) | 0.04 |
| Higher education vs. other types of education (%) | 402 (55.5) | 46 (54.1) | 356 (55.7) | 0.25 |
| Financial situation above average vs. at or below average (%) | 178 (24.6) | 17 (20.0) | 161 (25.2) | 0.16 |
| Living conditions average or modest vs. good or very good (%) | 313 (43.3) | 41 (48.2) | 272 (42.6) | 0.55 |
| Physical activity low or average vs. high (%) | 522 (72.1) | 74 (87.1) | 448 (70.1) | 0.0002 |
| Daily hours of sleep 6 or less vs. above 6 (%) | 254 (35.2) | 35 (41.2) | 219 (34.4) | 0.4 |
| Place of residence: village or city below 20,000 residents vs. city above 20,000 residents (%) | 253 (34.9) | 33 (38.8) | 220 (34.4) | 0.83 |
|
| ||||
| BMI [kg/m2] | 24.31 ± 4.40 | 30.91 ± 4.54 | 23.43 ± 3.56 | <0.0001 |
| Waist men [cm] (n = 404) | 88.01 ± 10.82 | 101.76 ± 11.81 | 85.84 ± 8.9 | <0.0001 |
| Waist women [cm] (n = 309) | 74.22 ± 11.4 | 97.85 ± 11.12 | 72.05 ± 8.66 | <0.0001 |
| WHR | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 0.93 ± 0.08 | 0.83 ± 0.09 | <0.0001 |
| SBP [mmHg] | 126.51 ± 13.97 | 138.64 ± 14.96 | 124.9 ± 13.01 | <0.0001 |
| DBP [mmHg] | 78.59 ± 10.52 | 87.53 ± 11.43 | 77.4 ± 9.81 | <0.0001 |
† Welch’s two-sample t-test for numerical variables. Pearson’s Chi-squared test for categorical variables.
The comparison of laboratory findings between young adult patients with and without MS.
| Variable | Total Sample | Metabolic Syndrome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| N (%) | 724 (100) | 85 (11.7) | 639 (88.3) | |
|
| ||||
| Cholesterol [mmol/L] | 4.94 ± 1.02 | 5.62 ± 1.06 | 4.84 ± 0.98 | <0.0001 |
| LDL-C [mmol/L] | 2.96 ± 0.94 | 3.66 ± 0.89 | 2.87 ± 0.9 | <0.0001 |
| Apolipoprotein B [g/L] | 0.93 ± 0.43 | 1.18 ± 0.28 | 0.9 ± 0.43 | <0.0001 |
| HDL-C [mmol/L] | 1.58 ± 0.44 | 1.13 ± 0.3 | 1.64 ± 0.42 | <0.0001 |
| HDL-C [%] | 33.33 ± 10.78 | 20.81 ± 6.66 | 34.99 ± 10.11 | <0.0001 |
| Apolipoprotein A [g/L] | 1.62 ± 0.32 | 1.45 ± 0.29 | 1.64 ± 0.31 | <0.0001 |
| Triglycerides [mmol/L] | 1.18 ± 1.02 | 2.65 ± 2.07 | 0.99 ± 0.55 | <0.0001 |
| Lp(a) [nmol/L] | 41.86 ± 63.28 | 49.14 ± 64.16 | 40.89 ± 63.15 | 0.27 |
|
| ||||
| AST [IU/L] | 23.59 ± 21.01 | 27.85 ± 14.35 | 23.02 ± 21.69 | 0.008 |
| ALT [IU/L] | 25.45 ± 23.6 | 41.22 ± 28.03 | 23.36 ± 22.14 | <0.0001 |
| GGT [IU/L] | 26.55 ± 29.82 | 55.4 ± 57.35 | 22.71 ± 21.19 | <0.0001 |
| LDH [IU/L] | 173.91 ± 38.45 | 188.33 ± 27.03 | 171.99 ± 39.35 | <0.0001 |
| Bilirubin [μmol/L] | 11.43 ± 6.35 | 10.71 ± 6 | 11.53 ± 6.39 | 0.24 |
| ALP [IU/L] | 64.65 ± 19.58 | 73.06 ± 16.98 | 63.54 ± 19.64 | <0.0001 |
|
| ||||
| Glucose [mmol/L] | 5.01 ± 0.45 | 5.45 ± 0.54 | 4.95 ± 0.41 | <0.0001 |
| HbA1c [%] | 4.99 ± 0.26 | 5.16 ± 0.26 | 4.95 ± 0.26 | <0.0001 |
| Total protein [g/L] | 75.24 ± 5.14 | 74.89 ± 3.7 | 75.29 ± 5.3 | 0.38 |
|
| ||||
| WBC [×109 /L] | 5.85 ± 1.49 | 6.58 ± 1.63 | 5.75 ± 1.44 | <0.0001 |
| Albumin [g/L] | 47.61 ± 3.32 | 47.18 ± 3.25 | 47.66 ± 3.32 | 0.20 |
| Homocysteine [μmol/L] | 11.69 ± 4.43 | 12.96 ± 7.54 | 11.52 ± 3.82 | 0.09 |
| Fibrinogen [mg/dL] | 275.08 ± 64.65 | 305.77 ± 72.17 | 271.01 ± 62.52 | 0.0001 |
| hsCRP [mg/dL] | 1.77 ± 2.74 | 2.47 ± 2.65 | 1.68 ± 2.74 | 0.01 |
| Uric acid [μmol/L] | 310.11 ± 75.8 | 368.95 ± 67.52 | 302.29 ± 73.4 | <0.0001 |
| Cystatin C [mg/dL] | 0.81 ± 0.11 | 0.84 ± 0.12 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.01 |
| Creatinine [μmol/L] | 78.1 ± 13.78 | 80.08 ± 13.95 | 77.83 ± 13.75 | 0.16 |
| TSH [mU/L] | 2.06 ± 1.11 | 2.23 ± 1.61 | 2.04 ± 1.03 | 0.29 |
| Vitamin D [ng/mL] | 22.51 ± 11.02 | 20.09 ± 11.06 | 22.83 ± 10.98 | 0.03 |
† Welch’s two-sample t-test.
The comparison of OS parameters between young adult patients with and without MS.
| Variable | Total Sample | Metabolic Syndrome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| N (%) | 724 (100) | 85 (11.7) | 639 (88.3) | |
| PSH [μmol/g protein] | 4.6 ± 0.77 | 4.4 ± 0.88 | 4.62 ± 0.77 | 0.03 |
| CER [mg/dL] | 44.04 ± 14.49 | 44.03 ± 14.47 | 44.04 ± 14.5 | 0.99 |
| TAC [mmol/L] | 1.07 ± 0.15 | 1.11 ± 0.17 | 1.06 ± 0.15 | 0.01 |
| TOS [μmol/L] | 11.91 ± 34.05 | 13.01 ± 37.6 | 11.76 ± 33.58 | 0.77 |
| OSI [%] | 1.13 ± 3.16 | 1.16 ± 3.12 | 1.13 ± 3.17 | 0.94 |
| LPH [μmol/L] | 5.9 ± 17.66 | 7.07 ± 21.71 | 5.74 ± 17.06 | 0.59 |
| SOD [NU/mL] | 20.72 ± 2.49 | 19.45 ± 2.43 | 20.89 ± 2.45 | <0.0001 |
| MnSOD [NU/mL] | 11.01 ± 1.84 | 10.57 ± 1.85 | 11.07 ± 1.83 | 0.02 |
| CuZnSOD [NU/mL] | 9.71 ± 1.93 | 8.86 ± 1.8 | 9.82 ± 1.93 | <0.0001 |
| LPS [RU/L] | 272.96 ± 138.26 | 255.93 ± 172.18 | 275.23 ± 133.11 | 0.32 |
| MDA [μmol/L] | 2.19 ± 2.4 | 2.3 ± 2.41 | 2.17 ± 2.41 | 0.64 |
† Welch’s two-sample t-test; TAC—total antioxidant capacity; TOS—total oxidative status; OSI—oxidative stress index; LPH—lipid hydroperoxides; SOD—superoxide dismutase; MnSOD—manganese-containing superoxide dismutase; CuZnSOD—copper- and zinc-containing superoxide dismutase; MDA—malondialdehyde.
Variable loadings and percent of variance explained by each principal component.
| Parameters | Factor Loadings | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| RC1 | RC2 | RC3 | |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 0.82 | ||
| WC [cm] | 0.85 | ||
| SBP [mmHg] | 0.88 | ||
| DBP [mmHg] | 0.89 | ||
| TC [mmol/L] | 0.98 | ||
| LDL [mmol/L] | 0.89 | ||
| HDL [mmol/L] | −0.73 | ||
| TG [mmol/L] | 0.45 | 0.48 | |
| Glucose [mmol/L] | 0.59 | ||
| HbA1c [%] | 0.48 | ||
| Variance explained | 28% | 22% | 18% |
| Cumulative variance explained | 28% | 50% | 68% |
Factor loadings of >|0.40| are shown in the table. Total variance in dietary variables explained by three patterns is 68%.
Figure 2Correlation between main components and OS parameters. In the upper part of the plot, correlation coefficients between variables are presented in the form of a pie-chart. In the lower part of the plot, Spearman correlation coefficients are given. For clarity only, correlation coefficients with p-value < 0.05 are presented. CER—ceruloplasmin; TAC—total antioxidant capacity; TOS—total oxidative status; OSI—oxidative stress index; LPH—lipid hydroperoxides; SOD—superoxide dismutase; MnSOD—manganese-containing superoxide dismutase; CuZnSOD—copper- and zinc-containing superoxide dismutase; LPS—lipofuscin; MDA—malondialdehyde.