| Literature DB >> 32256600 |
Landry Nguepnkep Kubong1, Prosper Cabral Nya Biapa2, Bernard Chetcha3, Nicolas Yanou-Njintang1, Vicky Jocelyne Moor Ama3, Constant Anatole Pieme3.
Abstract
Dyslipidemia is highly prevalent in sickle cell anemia (SCA) patients and is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases induced by oxidative stress in Africa. The aim of this research was to investigate the correlation between higher atherogenic index of plasma (API) and oxidative stress in a group of patients living with SCA in Cameroon. Methods. A group of 85 homozygote SS patients (male and female) were enrolled at the Central hospital of Yaounde in Cameroon between May and October 2017. After informed consent through the signature of a consent form was obtained, the plasma was collected to determine the lipid profile while the lysate solution of RBC was used to explore some markers of oxidative stress using spectrophotometric methods. Results. Among the 85 patients included in our study, the mean age was 30 ± 5 years and the female to male ratio was 0.97. The majority of the patients (52-81%) had dyslipidaemia, and 22.4% of the patients demonstrated a higher level of atherogenic index of plasma. The patients with a higher level of total cholesterol (TC) (>240 mg/dl) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) (>159 mg/dl) had at least 1,334 fold of malondialdeheyde (MDA) concentration than those with normal level. Also in the same patients, the higher atherogenic plasmatic index (API) significantly (p < 0.05) increased with the concentration of MDA. Except HDL-C, the other parameters of lipid profile had significant (p < 0.05) correlation with reduced glutathione (GsH) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC). The significant (p < 0.05) and linear regression was found between the increased MDA and higher API. Conclusion. Dyslipidemia increases oxidative stress and higher API which leads to coronary vascular disease in patients with SCA.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32256600 PMCID: PMC7103039 DOI: 10.1155/2020/9864371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Hematol
Characteristics of the population of the study.
| Characteristics | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 49.4 |
| Male | 50.6 | |
|
| ||
| Body mass index (BMI) | Underweight | 36.5 |
| Normal | 62.4 | |
| Overweight | 1.2 | |
|
| ||
| Alcohol consumption | No | 76.6 |
| Yes | 22.4 | |
|
| ||
| Folic acid consumption | No | 20 |
| Yes | 80 | |
|
| ||
| Hydroxyurea consumption | No | 95,3 |
| Yes | 4.7 | |
|
| ||
| Crisis | No | 51.8 |
| Yes | 48.2 | |
|
| ||
| Age interval | < 20 years | 42.2 |
| [20–29] years | 44.7 | |
| >30 years | 12.9 | |
Distribution of population according to the normal level of lipid profile and percentage of lipid profile.
| Lipid profile | Percentage (%) |
| N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mg/dl) | Normal (<200 mg/dl) | 48.2 | 0.000 | 85 |
| Abnormal | 51.8 | |||
|
| ||||
| TG (mg/dl) | Normal (< 135 mg/dl) | 77.6 | 0.000 | 85 |
| Abnormal | 22.4 | |||
|
| ||||
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | Normal (< 160 mg/dl) | 32.9 | 0.000 | 85 |
| Abnormal | 67.1 | |||
|
| ||||
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | Normal (> 40 mg/dl) | 17.6 | 0.000 | 85 |
| Abnormal | 82.4 | |||
|
| ||||
| AIP | Low (< 0.11) | 60.0 | ||
| Moderate (0.11–0.21) | 17.6 | |||
| High ( > 0.21) | 22.4 | |||
Chi-square test at p < 0.05. LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein, TC = total cholesterol, TRIG = triglyceride, and HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein. Reference values: TC between 140 and 250 mg/dl; TG not greater than 150 mg/dl; HDL-C between 50 and 60 mg/dl. AIP = atherogenic index of plasma.
Effect of lipid profile on some markers of oxidative stress.
| Lipid profile | SOD (UI/mg protein) | GsH ( | GPx (UI/mg protein) | FRAP ( | CAT (UI/mg protein) | MDA ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC (mg/dl) | Normal | 1.01 ± 1.00 | 4.62 ± 0.34 | 0.64 ± 1.03 | 272.12 ± 12.5 | 2.26 ± 0.55 | 0.97 ± 0.77 |
| Abnormal | 0.78 ± 0.72 | 3.80 ± 1.34 | 0.52 ± 0.27 | 238.59 ± 10.5 | 1.10 ± 0.56 | 1.30 ± 0.2 | |
|
| |||||||
| TG (mg/dl) | Normal | 0.95 ± 0.95 | 4.67 ± 0.2 | 0.59 ± 0.83 | 275.42 ± 16.47 | 1.14 ± 0.59 | 1.10 ± 0.17 |
| Abnormal | 0.71 ± 0.48 | 4.10 ± 0.4 | 0.55 ± 0.26 | 200.34 ± 9.68 | 1.29 ± 0.42 | 2.15 ± 0.2 | |
|
| |||||||
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | Normal | 0.82 ± 0.10 | 4.48 ± 0.28 | 0.74 ± 0.23 | 234.50 ± 71.91 | 1.26 ± 0.10 | 0.89 ± 0.16 |
| Abnormal | 0.93 ± 0.13 | 3.71 ± 0.24 | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 266.48 ± 78.55 | 1.13 ± 0.07 | 1.26 ± 1.46 | |
|
| |||||||
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | Normal | 0.90 ± 0.15 | 3.66 ± 0.32 | 0.53 ± 0.07 | 236.46 ± 54.87 | 1.18 ± 0.10 | 0.67 ± 0.14 |
| Abnormal | 0.89 ± 0.11 | 4.35 ± 0.24 | 0.59 ± 0.09 | 260.12 ± 9.70 | 1.17 ± 0.07 | 1.24 ± 0.16 | |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. indicates the values are statistically significant in the same column. p < 0.05. GsH = reduced glutathione, SOD = superoxide dismutase, FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power, GPx = glutathione peroxidase; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein, TC = total cholesterol, TG = triglyceride, and HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein.
Relation between atherogenic plasmatic index and markers of oxidative stress.
| Atherogenic plasmatic index | MDA ( | SOD (UI/mg protein) | GsH ( | GPx (UI/mg protein) | FRAP ( | CAT (UI/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low ( | 0.02 ± 1.4a | 1.39 ± 0.6ab | 4.21 ± 2.1 | 0.60 ± 0.3 | 280.96 ± 7.3 | 1.33 ± 0.3 |
| Moderate ( | 1.21 ± 1.1 b | 0.85 ± 0.1b | 3.54 ± 1.3 | 0.52 ± 0.1 | 263.36 ± 10.0 | 1.14 ± 0.6 |
| High ( | 1.46 ± 1.0 b | 0.63 ± 0.1bc | 3.79 ± 1.8 | 0.56 ± 0.1 | 244.45 ± 7.0 | 1.11 ± 0.3 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Values subscripted with different letters are significantly different in the same column p < 0.05. GsH = reduced glutathione, SOD = superoxide dismutase, FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power, MDA = malondialdehyde, CAT = catalase, and GPx = glutathione peroxidase.
Influence of gender and the age of sickle cell anemia detection on the stress profile.
| Gender | N | Mean ± SD | Duration SCA | N | Mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA ( | Men | 43 | 1.34 ± 1.63 | ≤1 year | 23 | 1.61 ± 2.02 |
| Women | 42 | 0.92 ± 0.79 | >1 year | 62 | 0.95a ± 0.85 | |
|
| ||||||
| CAT (UI/mg protein) | Men | 43 | 1.11 ± .47 | ≤1 year | 23 | 1.16 ± 0.63 |
| Women | 42 | 1.24 ± .63 | >1 year | 62 | 1.18 ± 0.53 | |
|
| ||||||
| SOD (UI/mg protein) | Men | 43 | 0.76 ± .56 | ≤1 year | 23 | 0.80 ± 0.86 |
| Women | 42 | 1.03 ± 1.09 | >1 year | 62 | 0.93 ± 0.88 | |
|
| ||||||
| GsH ( | Men | 43 | 4.42 ± 2.16 | ≤1 year | 23 | 4.82 ± 2.77 |
| Women | 42 | 4.03 ± 1.72 | >1 year | 62 | 4.00 ± 1.52 | |
|
| ||||||
| GPx | Men | 43 | 0.51 ± .27 | ≤1 year | 23 | 0.44 ± 0.20 |
| Women | 42 | 0.65 ± 1.01 | >1 year | 62 | 0.63 ± 0.85 | |
|
| ||||||
| FRAP ( | Men | 43 | 278.04 ± 81.28 | ≤1 year | 23 | 255.16 ± 101.75 |
| Women | 42 | 233.32a±67.06 | >1 year | 62 | 256.24 ± 67.33 | |
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. Values subscripted with different letters are significantly different in the same column p < 0.05. MDA = malondialdehyde; CAT = catalase, GPx = glutathione peroxidase, GsH = reduced glutathione, SOD = superoxide dismutase, FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein, TC = total cholesterol, TG = triglyceride, and HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein.
Influence of folic acid intake on some markers of oxidative stress and lipid profile.
| Folic acid consumption | N | Mean ± SD |
| Lipid profile | Folic acid consumption | N | Mean ± SD |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDA ( | No | 17 | 1.25 ± 0.71 | 0.018 | TC (mg/dl) | No | 17 | 142.68 ± 41.48 | 0.83 |
| Yes | 67 | 0.66 ± 1.39 | Yes | 67 | 145.04 ± 42.02 | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| CAT (UI/mg protein) | No | 17 | 1.16 ± 0.40 | 0.91 | TG (mg/dL) | No | 17 | 141.47 ± 77.08 | 0.04 |
| Yes | 67 | 1.17 ± 0.59 | Yes | 67 | 108.39 ± 53.46 | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| SOD (UI/mg protein) | No | 17 | 0.76 ± 0.45 | 0.37 | LDL-C (mg/dL) | No | 17 | 74.09 ± 38.64 | 0.59 |
| Yes | 67 | 0.90 ± 0.93 | Yes | 67 | 79.76 ± 41.29 | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| GsH ( | No | 17 | 3.76 ± 1.50 | 0.16 | HDL-C (mg/dL) | No | 17 | 40.21 ± 12.48 | 0.24 |
| Yes | 67 | 4.38 ± 2.03 | Yes | 67 | 44.21 ± 12.25 | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| GPx (UI/mg protein) | No | 17 | 0.49 ± 0.24 | 0.36 | AIP | No | 0.2197 ± 0.01 | 0.009 | |
| Yes | 67 | 0.60 ± 0.82 | Yes | 0.0970 ± 0.00 | |||||
Results are expressed as mean ± SD. p < 0.05 is statistically significant. MDA = malondialdehyde, CAT= catalase, GPx = glutathione peroxidase, GsH = reduced glutathione, SOD= superoxide dismutase, FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power, LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein, TC = total cholesterol, TG = triglyceride, HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein, and AIP = atherogenic index of plasma.
Influence of folic acid intake on some AIP, gender, and painful crises.
| Folic acid |
| Men | Women | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | ||||
| AIP |
| % within folic acid | 35.3% | 66.% |
| 37.5% | 60% | 33.3% | 72.2% |
|
| % within folic acid | 11.8% | 19.1% | 0 | 20% | 22.2% | 18.2% | ||
|
| % within folic acid | 52.9% | 14.7% | 62.5% | 20% | 44.4% | 9.1% | ||
|
| |||||||||
| Painful crises | Yes | 54.4% | 45.6% |
| |||||
| No | 41.2% | 58.8% | |||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
|
| 0.77 | ||||||||
|
| 1.320 | ||||||||
AIP: atherogenic plasmatic index.
Correlation between lipid profile and some markers of stress.
| MDA ( | SOD (UI/mg protein) | GsH ( | FRAP ( | TC (mg/dl) | TG (mg/dl) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOD (UI/mg protein) | −0.169 | 1 | ||||
| GsH ( | 0.579 | −0.302 | 1 | |||
| FRAP ( | 0.588 | −0.317 | 0.570 | 1 | ||
| TC (mg/dl) | −0.150 | −027 | −0.287 | −0.299 | 1 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 0.123 | −0.124 | 0.230 | 0.226 | 0.017 | 1 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | −0.192 | 0.033 | −0.352 | −0.335 | 0.913 | −0.257 |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | −0.011 | −0.013 | −0.013 | −0.120 | 0.329 | −0.092 |
p < 0.05, p < 0.01; MDA = malondialdehyde; CAT = catalase; GPx = glutathione peroxidase; GsH = reduced glutathione; SOD = superoxide dismutase; FRAP = ferric reducing antioxidant power; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein; TC = total cholesterol; TG = triglyceride; HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein.
Prediction of the crisis state considering antioxidant and lipid parameters in the final model logistic regression.
| B | Wald |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1a | CAT | −0.944 | 4.232 | 0.040 |
| Constant | 1.027 | 3.257 | 0.071 | |
|
| ||||
| Step 2b | CAT | −0.991 | 4.500 | 0.034 |
| LDL-C | 0.014 | 4.021 | 0.045 | |
| Constant | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.996 | |
a Variable (s) entered on step 1: CAT (catalase); b Variable (s) entered on step 2: LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol); Wald: Wald statistic coefficient. B : the meaning of the coefficient B indicates the direction of the relationship. Thus, the relationship is positive for the LDL variable, which means that high LDL values predict the presence of crisis. On the other hand, the relationship is negative with CAT, which means that the higher the CAT values, the less likely the patient will develop a crisis.
Figure 1Linear regression between the MDA level and the high API.