Literature DB >> 9686693

Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

K G Alberti1, P Z Zimmet.   

Abstract

The classification of diabetes mellitus and the tests used for its diagnosis were brought into order by the National Diabetes Data Group of the USA and the second World Health Organization Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus in 1979 and 1980. Apart from minor modifications by WHO in 1985, little has been changed since that time. There is however considerable new knowledge regarding the aetiology of different forms of diabetes as well as more information on the predictive value of different blood glucose values for the complications of diabetes. A WHO Consultation has therefore taken place in parallel with a report by an American Diabetes Association Expert Committee to re-examine diagnostic criteria and classification. The present document includes the conclusions of the former and is intended for wide distribution and discussion before final proposals are submitted to WHO for approval. The main changes proposed are as follows. The diagnostic fasting plasma (blood) glucose value has been lowered to > or =7.0 mmol l(-1) (6.1 mmol l(-1)). Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) is changed to allow for the new fasting level. A new category of Impaired Fasting Glycaemia (IFG) is proposed to encompass values which are above normal but below the diagnostic cut-off for diabetes (plasma > or =6.1 to <7.0 mmol l(-1); whole blood > or =5.6 to <6.1 mmol l(-1)). Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) now includes gestational impaired glucose tolerance as well as the previous GDM. The classification defines both process and stage of the disease. The processes include Type 1, autoimmune and non-autoimmune, with beta-cell destruction; Type 2 with varying degrees of insulin resistance and insulin hyposecretion; Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; and Other Types where the cause is known (e.g. MODY, endocrinopathies). It is anticipated that this group will expand as causes of Type 2 become known. Stages range from normoglycaemia to insulin required for survival. It is hoped that the new classification will allow better classification of individuals and lead to fewer therapeutic misjudgements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9686693     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO;2-S

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  2000 in total

1.  UK's diagnostic criteria for diabetes are different from US's.

Authors:  E S Kilpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-02

2.  Immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Meta-analysis should not have included one of the studies.

Authors:  G Morris-Stiff; A Khan; I Quiroga; R Baboo; W A Jurewicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-23

3.  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, endorsed by the British Diabetic Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  New diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus. New criteria result in fewer cases in older adults.

Authors:  H E Resnick; T B Harris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-02-20

Review 5.  Glycated haemoglobin in the year 2000.

Authors:  E S Kilpatrick
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Screening for type 2 diabetes. Undiagnosed diabetes must be detected.

Authors:  P Streets
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

7.  [Comments to underevaluation of the ADA criteria with respect to the prevalence of diabetes in a high-risk Spanish population].

Authors:  J M Baena Díez; J L Martínez Martínez; P Piñol Forcadell; B Alvarez Pérez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 1.137

Review 8.  Should we screen for type 2 diabetes? Evaluation against National Screening Committee criteria.

Authors:  N J Wareham; S J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

9.  Comparison of usefulness of systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure and pulse pressure as predictors of cardiovascular death in patients >/=60 years of age (The Dubbo Study).

Authors:  Latha Palaniappan; Leon A Simons; Judith Simons; Yechiel Friedlander; John McCallum
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Left atrium passive ejection fraction is the most sensitive index of type 2 diabetes mellitus-related cardiac changes.

Authors:  Yongning Shang; Xiaochun Zhang; Weiling Leng; Xiaotian Lei; Liu Chen; Ziwen Liang; Jian Wang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.