Literature DB >> 35047356

Twenty-four hours intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes assessed by applanation tonometry and Tono-Pen AVIA.

Rafael Vidal Merola1, Sebastião Cronemberger1, Artur William Veloso1, Alberto Diniz-Filho1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess intraocular pressure (IOP) during the daily curve of intraocular pressure (DCPo) in keratoconic eyes and compare Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), without and with astigmatism correction (nGAT and cGAT) and Tono-Pen AVIA (TPA) assessment methods.
METHODS: Thirty-nine keratoconic eyes of 24 patients were assessed. DCPo was evaluated with five IOP measurements; four were performed with a GAT (nGAT and cGAT), and a Tono-Pen AVIA (TPA) at various times throughout the day.
RESULTS: Mean IOP DCPo values (mm Hg) were: nGAT, 9.9±2.6; cGAT, 11.3±2.6; TPA 12.3±3.1. Mean IOP DCPo differences (mm Hg) and Spearman's correlation coefficients were as follows: cGATc-nGAT, 1.32±1.31, r s=0.879 (P<0.01); cGAT-TPA, -1.02±2.08, r s=0.723 (P<0.01); and nGAT-TPA, -2.35±2.23, r s=0.730 (P<0.01). Bland-Altman analysis for agreement between cGAT-TPA and nGAT-TPA mean IOP DCPo measurements revealed a mean difference of 1.02 (95%CI, 0.35-1.70) and 2.35 (95%CI, 1.62-3.07) mm Hg, respectively. Regression analysis yielded the following equation: TPA IOP=5.49+0.775×cGAT-0.015×ACD-0.299×corneal astig matism, which allowed us to infer TPA IOP values from other parameters.
CONCLUSION: In keratoconic eyes, IOP peaks of DCPo measurements are identified at 6 a.m., independent of the tonometer. The mean DCPo values are: TPA>cGAT>nGAT. IOP TPA measures are predictive of cGAT values, adjusted according to anterior chamber depth and corneal astigmatism. International Journal of Ophthalmology Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraocular pressure; keratoconus; tonometry

Year:  2022        PMID: 35047356      PMCID: PMC8720333          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.01.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  39 in total

1.  Goldmann applanation tonometry versus ocular response analyzer for intraocular pressure measurements in keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Yakov Goldich; Yaniv Barkana; Isaac Avni; David Zadok
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure in glaucoma management: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Edward Hughes; Paul Spry; Jeremy Diamond
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus.

Authors:  Renato Ambrósio; Ruiz Simonato Alonso; Allan Luz; Luis Guillermo Coca Velarde
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Intraocular pressure and ocular rigidity after LASIK.

Authors:  Sebastião Cronemberger; Cláudia Savassi Guimarães; Nassim Calixto; José Márcio Fonseca Calixto
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.872

5.  Intraocular pressure in keratoconus.

Authors:  Scott A Read; Michael J Collins
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 6.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.

Authors:  M M Whitacre; R Stein
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.

Authors:  Jan Darius Unterlauft; Nina Schädle; Karsten Kasper; Thomas Klink; Gerd Geerling
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.651

8.  Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.

Authors:  André Rosentreter; Apostolos Athanasopoulos; Andrea M Schild; Alexandra Lappas; Claus Cursiefen; Thomas S Dietlein
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Bilateral Keratoconus Progression: Immediate Versus Delayed Sequential Bilateral Corneal Cross-linking.

Authors:  Luca Pagano; Kunal Ajit Gadhvi; Davide Borroni; Katja C Iselin; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Argyrios Tzamalis; Stephen B Kaye; Vito Romano
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Intraocular Pressure Elevation in Keratoconus with Coexisting Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma: How Important is the Method of Measurement?

Authors:  Olga Zabek; Georgios D Panos; Despoina Sagri; Konstantin Gugleta; Hendrik P N Scholl; Zisis Gatzioufas
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 0.700

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.