PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution differentiate keratoconic corneas from normal corneas using new tomography parameters. SETTING: Subspecialty cornea and refractive practice, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS: Forty-six eyes diagnosed with mild to moderate keratoconus and 364 normal eyes were studied by the Pentacam Comprehensive Eye Scanner. Corneal thickness at the thinnest point and the averages of the points on 22 imaginary circles centered on the thinnest point with increased diameters at 0.4 mm steps were calculated to create a corneal-thickness spatial profile. Corneal volume was calculated within diameters from 1.0 to 7.0 mm with 0.5 mm steps centered on the thinnest point to create the corneal-volume distribution. The percentage increase in thickness and the percentage increase in volume were calculated for each position of the corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution from their first value. Statistical analysis was done using the Wilcoxon 2-independent-sample test to compare mean levels using S-Plus-4.0 software (MathSoft) and a normal linear model under a Bayesian frame for estimating the mean variation in thickness and volume using the BUGS 0.6 package. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups (P<.05) in all positions of corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution and in the percentage increase in thickness and percentage increase in volume between 3.5 mm and 7.0 mm diameters. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal-thickness spatial profile, corneal-volume distribution, percentage increase in thickness, and percentage increase in volume were different between keratoconic corneas and normal corneas and could serve as indices to diagnose keratoconus and screen refractive candidates. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether these tomographic indices are more sensitive and specific than the classic Placido-based topography.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution differentiate keratoconic corneas from normal corneas using new tomography parameters. SETTING: Subspecialty cornea and refractive practice, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. METHODS: Forty-six eyes diagnosed with mild to moderate keratoconus and 364 normal eyes were studied by the Pentacam Comprehensive Eye Scanner. Corneal thickness at the thinnest point and the averages of the points on 22 imaginary circles centered on the thinnest point with increased diameters at 0.4 mm steps were calculated to create a corneal-thickness spatial profile. Corneal volume was calculated within diameters from 1.0 to 7.0 mm with 0.5 mm steps centered on the thinnest point to create the corneal-volume distribution. The percentage increase in thickness and the percentage increase in volume were calculated for each position of the corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution from their first value. Statistical analysis was done using the Wilcoxon 2-independent-sample test to compare mean levels using S-Plus-4.0 software (MathSoft) and a normal linear model under a Bayesian frame for estimating the mean variation in thickness and volume using the BUGS 0.6 package. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups (P<.05) in all positions of corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution and in the percentage increase in thickness and percentage increase in volume between 3.5 mm and 7.0 mm diameters. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal-thickness spatial profile, corneal-volume distribution, percentage increase in thickness, and percentage increase in volume were different between keratoconic corneas and normal corneas and could serve as indices to diagnose keratoconus and screen refractive candidates. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether these tomographic indices are more sensitive and specific than the classic Placido-based topography.
Authors: David P Piñero; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Roberto Soto-Negro; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Alberto Artola Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Orhan Ayar; Mehmet Cuneyt Ozmen; Orkun Muftuoglu; Mehmet Orcun Akdemir; Mustafa Koc; Kemal Ozulken Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-12-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Dan Z Reinstein; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Ronald H Silverman; D Jackson Coleman Journal: J Refract Surg Date: 2009-09-11 Impact factor: 3.573