Literature DB >> 34914339

21-Gene Assay to Inform Chemotherapy Benefit in Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Kevin Kalinsky1, William E Barlow1, Julie R Gralow1, Funda Meric-Bernstam1, Kathy S Albain1, Daniel F Hayes1, Nancy U Lin1, Edith A Perez1, Lori J Goldstein1, Stephen K L Chia1, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind1, Priya Rastogi1, Emilio Alba1, Suzette Delaloge1, Miguel Martin1, Catherine M Kelly1, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego1, Miguel Gil-Gil1, Claudia H Arce-Salinas1, Etienne G C Brain1, Eun-Sook Lee1, Jean-Yves Pierga1, Begoña Bermejo1, Manuel Ramos-Vazquez1, Kyung-Hae Jung1, Jean-Marc Ferrero1, Anne F Schott1, Steven Shak1, Priyanka Sharma1, Danika L Lew1, Jieling Miao1, Debasish Tripathy1, Lajos Pusztai1, Gabriel N Hortobagyi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recurrence score based on the 21-gene breast-cancer assay has been clinically useful in predicting a chemotherapy benefit in hormone-receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, axillary lymph-node-negative breast cancer. In women with positive lymph-node disease, the role of the recurrence score with respect to predicting a benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear.
METHODS: In a prospective trial, we randomly assigned women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, one to three positive axillary lymph nodes, and a recurrence score of 25 or lower (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a worse prognosis) to endocrine therapy only or to chemotherapy plus endocrine (chemoendocrine) therapy. The primary objective was to determine the effect of chemotherapy on invasive disease-free survival and whether the effect was influenced by the recurrence score. Secondary end points included distant relapse-free survival.
RESULTS: A total of 5083 women (33.2% premenopausal and 66.8% postmenopausal) underwent randomization, and 5018 participated in the trial. At the prespecified third interim analysis, the chemotherapy benefit with respect to increasing invasive disease-free survival differed according to menopausal status (P = 0.008 for the comparison of chemotherapy benefit in premenopausal and postmenopausal participants), and separate prespecified analyses were conducted. Among postmenopausal women, invasive disease-free survival at 5 years was 91.9% in the endocrine-only group and 91.3% in the chemoendocrine group, with no chemotherapy benefit (hazard ratio for invasive disease recurrence, new primary cancer [breast cancer or another type], or death, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.26; P = 0.89). Among premenopausal women, invasive disease-free survival at 5 years was 89.0% with endocrine-only therapy and 93.9% with chemoendocrine therapy (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.83; P = 0.002), with a similar increase in distant relapse-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87; P = 0.009). The relative chemotherapy benefit did not increase as the recurrence score increased.
CONCLUSIONS: Among premenopausal women with one to three positive lymph nodes and a recurrence score of 25 or lower, those who received chemoendocrine therapy had longer invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival than those who received endocrine-only therapy, whereas postmenopausal women with similar characteristics did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; RxPONDER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01272037.).
Copyright © 2021 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34914339      PMCID: PMC9096864          DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  28 in total

1.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Soonmyung Paik; Steven Shak; Gong Tang; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Michael G Walker; Drew Watson; Taesung Park; William Hiller; Edwin R Fisher; D Lawrence Wickerham; John Bryant; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system.

Authors:  Clifford A Hudis; William E Barlow; Joseph P Costantino; Robert J Gray; Kathleen I Pritchard; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Joseph A Sparano; Sally Hunsberger; Rebecca A Enos; Richard D Gelber; Jo Anne Zujewski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Matthew P Goetz; John A Olson; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter M Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; Jeffrey L Berenberg; Jeffrey Abrams; George W Sledge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Christopher Wale; John Forbes; Elizabeth A Mallon; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Anita Dunbier; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Steven Shak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Longer therapy, iatrogenic amenorrhea, and survival in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Sandra M Swain; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Charles E Geyer; Joseph P Costantino; Eduardo R Pajon; Louis Fehrenbacher; James N Atkins; Jonathan Polikoff; Victor G Vogel; John K Erban; Priya Rastogi; Robert B Livingston; Edith A Perez; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Stephanie R Land; Patricia A Ganz; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 176.079

9.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Absolute Improvements in Freedom From Distant Recurrence to Tailor Adjuvant Endocrine Therapies for Premenopausal Women: Results From TEXT and SOFT.

Authors:  Olivia Pagani; Prudence A Francis; Gini F Fleming; Barbara A Walley; Giuseppe Viale; Marco Colleoni; István Láng; Henry L Gómez; Carlo Tondini; Graziella Pinotti; Angelo Di Leo; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Richard D Gelber; Meredith M Regan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  61 in total

1.  Use of a convolutional neural network-based mammographic evaluation to predict breast cancer recurrence among women with hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer.

Authors:  Julia E McGuinness; Vicky Ro; Simukayi Mutasa; Samuel Pan; Jianhua Hu; Meghna S Trivedi; Melissa K Accordino; Kevin Kalinsky; Dawn L Hershman; Richard S Ha; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  New insights from recurrence score.

Authors:  Diana Romero
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Can Genomic Recurrence Score Replace SLNB in Postmenopausal Women with ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Maire J Amlicke; Philip M Spanheimer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  The prevalence and predictors of adjuvant chemotherapy use among patients treated with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Tal Sella; Olga Kantor; Anna Weiss; Ann H Partridge; Otto Metzger; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.624

5.  Prevalence of Pathologic N2/N3 Disease in Postmenopausal Women with Clinical N0 ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Maire J Amlicke; Jihye Park; Chris B Agala; Dana L Casey; Emily M Ray; Stephanie M Downs-Canner; Philip M Spanheimer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer In the Elderly: Are We Accomplishing Our Treatment Goals?

Authors:  Austin D Williams; Chau T Dang; Varadan Sevilimedu; Monica Morrow; Andrea V Barrio
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 4.339

7.  Expanding the Staging Criteria for T1-2N0 Hormone-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients Enrolled in TAILORx.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Harold J Burstein; Tari A King; Steven Shak; Christy A Russell; Armando E Giuliano; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Eric P Winer; Larissa A Korde; Joseph A Sparano; Elizabeth A Mittendorf
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.339

8.  Rates of pathologic nodal disease among cN0 and cN1 patients undergoing routine axillary ultrasound and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anna Weiss; Claire King; Julie Vincuilla; Tonia Parker; Leah Portnow; Faina Nakhlis; Laura Dominici; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.624

9.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone is Adequate for Chemotherapy Decisions in Postmenopausal Early-Stage Hormone-Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer with One to Three Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Olga Kantor; Anna Weiss; Harold J Burstein; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Tari A King
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.339

10.  A novel age-related gene expression signature associates with proliferation and disease progression in breast cancer.

Authors:  L M Ingebriktsen; K Finne; L A Akslen; E Wik
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 9.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.