Literature DB >> 16720680

Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Soonmyung Paik1, Gong Tang, Steven Shak, Chungyeul Kim, Joffre Baker, Wanseop Kim, Maureen Cronin, Frederick L Baehner, Drew Watson, John Bryant, Joseph P Costantino, Charles E Geyer, D Lawrence Wickerham, Norman Wolmark.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay quantifies the likelihood of distant recurrence in women with estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. The relationship between the RS and chemotherapy benefit is not known.
METHODS: The RS was measured in tumors from the tamoxifen-treated and tamoxifen plus chemotherapy-treated patients in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B20 trial. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to test for interaction between chemotherapy treatment and the RS.
RESULTS: A total of 651 patients were assessable (227 randomly assigned to tamoxifen and 424 randomly assigned to tamoxifen plus chemotherapy). The test for interaction between chemotherapy treatment and RS was statistically significant (P = .038). Patients with high-RS (> or = 31) tumors (ie, high risk of recurrence) had a large benefit from chemotherapy (relative risk, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.53; absolute decrease in 10-year distant recurrence rate: mean, 27.6%; SE, 8.0%). Patients with low-RS (< 18) tumors derived minimal, if any, benefit from chemotherapy treatment (relative risk, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.46 to 3.78; absolute decrease in distant recurrence rate at 10 years: mean, -1.1%; SE, 2.2%). Patients with intermediate-RS tumors did not appear to have a large benefit, but the uncertainty in the estimate can not exclude a clinically important benefit.
CONCLUSION: The RS assay not only quantifies the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, but also predicts the magnitude of chemotherapy benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16720680     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  820 in total

Review 1.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in older women: emerging evidence to aid in decision making.

Authors:  Gretchen Kimmick
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-09

Review 2.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: an emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer.

Authors:  A Singh; J Settleman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Health care reform: how personalized medicine could help bundling of care for liver diseases.

Authors:  Lopa Mishra
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Large-scale DNA organization is a prognostic marker of breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Martial Guillaud; Qian Ye; Sam Leung; Anita Carraro; Alan Harrison; Malcolm Hayes; Alan Nichol; Mira Keyes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Biomarker enrichment strategies: matching trial design to biomarker credentials.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Cost effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in post-menopausal women with early-stage estrogen or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Bin Xie; Muriel Brackstone; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  P Sinn; S Aulmann; R Wirtz; S Schott; F Marmé; Z Varga; A Lebeau; H Kreipe; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Intrinsic subtypes from the PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer survivor cohort: prognostication of short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Carol Sweeney; Laurel A Habel; Marilyn L Kwan; Candyce H Kroenke; Erin K Weltzien; Charles P Quesenberry; Adrienne Castillo; Rachel E Factor; Lawrence H Kushi; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Personalized medicine in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Cho; Jongsu Jeon; Seung Il Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.