Literature DB >> 20212256

Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study.

Mitch Dowsett1, Jack Cuzick, Christopher Wale, John Forbes, Elizabeth A Mallon, Janine Salter, Emma Quinn, Anita Dunbier, Michael Baum, Aman Buzdar, Anthony Howell, Roberto Bugarini, Frederick L Baehner, Steven Shak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE To determine whether the Recurrence Score (RS) provided independent information on risk of distant recurrence (DR) in the tamoxifen and anastrozole arms of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) Trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS RNA was extracted from 1,372 tumor blocks from postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer in the monotherapy arms of ATAC. Twenty-one genes were assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and the RS was calculated. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the value of adding RS to a model with clinical variables (age, tumor size, grade, and treatment) in node-negative (N0) and node-positive (N+) women. RESULTS Reportable scores were available from 1,231 evaluable patients (N0, n = 872; N+, n = 306; and node status unknown, n = 53); 72, 74, and six DRs occurred in N0, N+, and node status unknown patients, respectively. For both N0 and N+ patients, RS was significantly associated with time to DR in multivariate analyses (P < .001 for N0 and P = .002 for N+). RS also showed significant prognostic value beyond that provided by Adjuvant! Online (P < .001). Nine-year DR rates in low (RS < 18), intermediate (RS = 18 to 30), and high RS (RS > or = 31) groups were 4%, 12%, and 25%, respectively, in N0 patients and 17%, 28%, and 49%, respectively, in N+ patients. The prognostic value of RS was similar in anastrozole- and tamoxifen-treated patients. CONCLUSION This study confirmed the performance of RS in postmenopausal HR+ patients treated with tamoxifen in a large contemporary population and demonstrated that RS is an independent predictor of DR in N0 and N+ hormone receptor-positive patients treated with anastrozole, adding value to estimates with standard clinicopathologic features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20212256     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  238 in total

Review 1.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Why does Oncotype DX recurrence score reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use?

Authors:  Jeffrey G Schneider; Danny N Khalil
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Chemotherapy and the recurrence score--results as expected?

Authors:  Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Propensity score analysis of the prognostic value of genomic assays for breast cancer in diverse populations using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Abiola Ibraheem; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Is There a Role for Oncotype Dx Testing in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?

Authors:  Niamh Conlon; Dara S Ross; Jane Howard; Jeffrey P Catalano; Maura N Dickler; Lee K Tan
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Large-scale DNA organization is a prognostic marker of breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Martial Guillaud; Qian Ye; Sam Leung; Anita Carraro; Alan Harrison; Malcolm Hayes; Alan Nichol; Mira Keyes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Cost effectiveness of a 21-gene recurrence score assay versus Canadian clinical practice in post-menopausal women with early-stage estrogen or progesterone-receptor-positive, axillary lymph-node positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Malek B Hannouf; Bin Xie; Muriel Brackstone; Gregory S Zaric
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Genomic profiling in luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Daniel Hofmann; Rachel Würstlein; Cornelia Liedtke; Ulrike Nitz; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Oncotype DX testing in node-positive breast cancer strongly impacts chemotherapy use at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Katya Losk; Rachel A Freedman; Alison Laws; Olga Kantor; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Zhenying Tan-Wasielewski; Lorenzo Trippa; Nancy U Lin; Eric P Winer; Tari A King
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.