Literature DB >> 17513820

Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system.

Clifford A Hudis1, William E Barlow, Joseph P Costantino, Robert J Gray, Kathleen I Pritchard, Judith-Anne W Chapman, Joseph A Sparano, Sally Hunsberger, Rebecca A Enos, Richard D Gelber, Jo Anne Zujewski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standardized definitions of breast cancer clinical trial end points must be adopted to permit the consistent interpretation and analysis of breast cancer clinical trials and to facilitate cross-trial comparisons and meta-analyses. Standardizing terms will allow for uniformity in data collection across studies, which will optimize clinical trial utility and efficiency. A given end point term (eg, overall survival) used in a breast cancer trial should always encompass the same set of events (eg, death attributable to breast cancer, death attributable to cause other than breast cancer, death from unknown cause), and, in turn, each event within that end point should be commonly defined across end points and studies.
METHODS: A panel of experts in breast cancer clinical trials representing medical oncology, biostatistics, and correlative science convened to formulate standard definitions and address the confusion that nonstandard definitions of widely used end point terms for a breast cancer clinical trial can generate. We propose standard definitions for efficacy end points and events in early-stage adjuvant breast cancer clinical trials. In some cases, it is expected that the standard end points may not address a specific trial question, so that modified or customized end points would need to be prospectively defined and consistently used.
CONCLUSION: The use of the proposed common end point definitions will facilitate interpretation of trial outcomes. This approach may be adopted to develop standard outcome definitions for use in trials involving other cancer sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17513820     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  307 in total

1.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry; Angela DeMichele; Lisa Carey; Sarah E Davis; Meredith Buxton; Cliff Hudis; Joe W Gray; Charles Perou; Christina Yau; Chad Livasy; Helen Krontiras; Leslie Montgomery; Debasish Tripathy; Constance Lehman; Minetta C Liu; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Hope S Rugo; John T Carpenter; Lynn Dressler; David Chhieng; Baljit Singh; Carolyn Mies; Joseph Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Dilip Giri; Laura van 't Veer; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology.

Authors:  Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav; Sminil Mahajan; James C Yao; Brian P Hobbs; Donald A Berry; Rebecca D Pentz; Alda Tam; Waun K Hong; Lee M Ellis; James Abbruzzese; Michael J Overman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Use of letrozole after aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer (NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Eleftherios P Mamounas; Hanna Bandos; Barry C Lembersky; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Charles E Geyer; Priya Rastogi; Louis Fehrenbacher; Mark L Graham; Stephen K Chia; Adam M Brufsky; Janice M Walshe; Gamini S Soori; Shaker R Dakhil; Thomas E Seay; James L Wade; Edward C McCarron; Soonmyung Paik; Sandra M Swain; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Real-Time Measurement of Functional Tumor Volume by MRI to Assess Treatment Response in Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Clinical Trials: Validation of the Aegis SER Software Platform.

Authors:  David C Newitt; Sheye O Aliu; Neil Witcomb; Gal Sela; John Kornak; Laura Esserman; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Genetic Polymorphisms in the Long Noncoding RNA MIR2052HG Offer a Pharmacogenomic Basis for the Response of Breast Cancer Patients to Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy.

Authors:  James N Ingle; Fang Xie; Matthew J Ellis; Paul E Goss; Lois E Shepherd; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Bingshu E Chen; Michiaki Kubo; Yoichi Furukawa; Yukihide Momozawa; Vered Stearns; Kathleen I Pritchard; Poulami Barman; Erin E Carlson; Matthew P Goetz; Richard M Weinshilboum; Krishna R Kalari; Liewei Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Comparative safety of cardiovascular medication use and breast cancer outcomes among women with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Onchee Yu; Jessica Chubak; Heidi S Wirtz; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Monica Fujii; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Breast carcinoma with an Oncotype Dx recurrence score <18: Rate of distant metastases in a large series with clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Hannah Y Wen; Melissa Krystel-Whittemore; Sujata Patil; Fresia Pareja; Zenica L Bowser; Maura N Dickler; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Clifford A Hudis; Edi Brogi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Comparison of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide versus single-agent paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer in women with 0 to 3 positive axillary nodes: CALGB 40101 (Alliance).

Authors:  Lawrence N Shulman; Donald A Berry; Constance T Cirrincione; Heather P Becker; Edith A Perez; Ruth O'Regan; Silvana Martino; Charles L Shapiro; Charles J Schneider; Gretchen Kimmick; Harold J Burstein; Larry Norton; Hyman Muss; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.