Tal Sella1,2,3, Olga Kantor2,3,4, Anna Weiss2,3,4, Ann H Partridge1,2,3, Otto Metzger1,2,3, Tari A King5,6,7. 1. Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. tking7@bwh.harvard.edu. 6. Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. tking7@bwh.harvard.edu. 7. Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. tking7@bwh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) facilitates clinical response and breast conservation in hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancer. Patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) post-NET is unclear and potentially evolving with use of genomic assays. We evaluated post-NET CT use in a national dataset. METHODS: Using the National Cancer DataBase, we identified patients with cT2-3N0-3M0 HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated between 2010 and 2017 with 3-12 months of NET prior to breast surgery. CT use was evaluated in the overall population, in patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and in patients with ypT1-2N0 disease (approximating PEPI 0). Exploratory analysis included patients > 50 years with ypN0-1, and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) ≤ 25 (approximating TAILORx/RxPONDER populations not benefiting from CT). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with CT. RESULTS: Among 3624 eligible patients, 20.4% (740/3624) received CT. On multivariable analysis, age ≤ 50, lobular histology, grade 2, progesterone receptor negativity, ypT3, ypN + and RS ≥ 18 were associated with CT receipt. Co-morbidity, longer NET duration, ypT4, ypNx, and RS < 18 were associated with CT omission. CT was administered to 3.3% (1/30) of patients experiencing pCR and 5.5% (82/1483) with ypT1-2N0 disease. Among patients > 50 years with ypT0-3N0-1 residual disease, 13.8% (355/2569) received CT; RS was available for 24.8% (88/355) and 60% (53/88) had a score 0-25. CONCLUSION: A minority of patients receive CT post-NET. This decision appears to be driven by younger age, RS and pathological nodal status. Increased consideration of these factors prior to neoadjuvant treatment choice may be warranted.
PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) facilitates clinical response and breast conservation in hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive) breast cancer. Patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) post-NET is unclear and potentially evolving with use of genomic assays. We evaluated post-NET CT use in a national dataset. METHODS: Using the National Cancer DataBase, we identified patients with cT2-3N0-3M0 HR-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer treated between 2010 and 2017 with 3-12 months of NET prior to breast surgery. CT use was evaluated in the overall population, in patients with a pathologic complete response (pCR) and in patients with ypT1-2N0 disease (approximating PEPI 0). Exploratory analysis included patients > 50 years with ypN0-1, and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) ≤ 25 (approximating TAILORx/RxPONDER populations not benefiting from CT). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with CT. RESULTS: Among 3624 eligible patients, 20.4% (740/3624) received CT. On multivariable analysis, age ≤ 50, lobular histology, grade 2, progesterone receptor negativity, ypT3, ypN + and RS ≥ 18 were associated with CT receipt. Co-morbidity, longer NET duration, ypT4, ypNx, and RS < 18 were associated with CT omission. CT was administered to 3.3% (1/30) of patients experiencing pCR and 5.5% (82/1483) with ypT1-2N0 disease. Among patients > 50 years with ypT0-3N0-1 residual disease, 13.8% (355/2569) received CT; RS was available for 24.8% (88/355) and 60% (53/88) had a score 0-25. CONCLUSION: A minority of patients receive CT post-NET. This decision appears to be driven by younger age, RS and pathological nodal status. Increased consideration of these factors prior to neoadjuvant treatment choice may be warranted.
Authors: Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Stephen R Ebbs; J Michael Dixon; Anthony Skene; Roger A'Hern; Janine Salter; Simone Detre; Margaret Hills; Geraldine Walsh Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-01-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Carlos A Puig; Tanya L Hoskin; Courtney N Day; Elizabeth B Habermann; Judy C Boughey Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: G Curigliano; H J Burstein; E P Winer; M Gnant; P Dubsky; S Loibl; M Colleoni; M M Regan; M Piccart-Gebhart; H-J Senn; B Thürlimann; F André; J Baselga; J Bergh; H Bonnefoi; S Y Brucker; F Cardoso; L Carey; E Ciruelos; J Cuzick; C Denkert; A Di Leo; B Ejlertsen; P Francis; V Galimberti; J Garber; B Gulluoglu; P Goodwin; N Harbeck; D F Hayes; C-S Huang; J Huober; K Hussein; J Jassem; Z Jiang; P Karlsson; M Morrow; R Orecchia; K C Osborne; O Pagani; A H Partridge; K Pritchard; J Ro; E J T Rutgers; F Sedlmayer; V Semiglazov; Z Shao; I Smith; M Toi; A Tutt; G Viale; T Watanabe; T J Whelan; B Xu Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Kevin Kalinsky; William E Barlow; Julie R Gralow; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Nancy U Lin; Edith A Perez; Lori J Goldstein; Stephen K L Chia; Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind; Priya Rastogi; Emilio Alba; Suzette Delaloge; Miguel Martin; Catherine M Kelly; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Miguel Gil-Gil; Claudia H Arce-Salinas; Etienne G C Brain; Eun-Sook Lee; Jean-Yves Pierga; Begoña Bermejo; Manuel Ramos-Vazquez; Kyung-Hae Jung; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Anne F Schott; Steven Shak; Priyanka Sharma; Danika L Lew; Jieling Miao; Debasish Tripathy; Lajos Pusztai; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tal Sella; Anna Weiss; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Tari A King; Melissa Pilewskie; Armando E Giuliano; Otto Metzger-Filho Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joseph A Sparano; Robert J Gray; Della F Makower; Kathleen I Pritchard; Kathy S Albain; Daniel F Hayes; Charles E Geyer; Elizabeth C Dees; Edith A Perez; John A Olson; JoAnne Zujewski; Tracy Lively; Sunil S Badve; Thomas J Saphner; Lynne I Wagner; Timothy J Whelan; Matthew J Ellis; Soonmyung Paik; William C Wood; Peter Ravdin; Maccon M Keane; Henry L Gomez Moreno; Pavan S Reddy; Timothy F Goggins; Ingrid A Mayer; Adam M Brufsky; Deborah L Toppmeyer; Virginia G Kaklamani; James N Atkins; Jeffrey L Berenberg; George W Sledge Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew J Ellis; Vera J Suman; Jeremy Hoog; Rodrigo Goncalves; Souzan Sanati; Chad J Creighton; Katherine DeSchryver; Erika Crouch; Amy Brink; Mark Watson; Jingqin Luo; Yu Tao; Michael Barnes; Mitchell Dowsett; G Thomas Budd; Eric Winer; Paula Silverman; Laura Esserman; Lisa Carey; Cynthia X Ma; Gary Unzeitig; Timothy Pluard; Pat Whitworth; Gildy Babiera; J Michael Guenther; Zoneddy Dayao; David Ota; Marilyn Leitch; John A Olson; D Craig Allred; Kelly Hunt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura M Spring; Arjun Gupta; Kerry L Reynolds; Michele A Gadd; Leif W Ellisen; Steven J Isakoff; Beverly Moy; Aditya Bardia Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ian Smith; John Robertson; Lucy Kilburn; Maggie Wilcox; Abigail Evans; Chris Holcombe; Kieran Horgan; Cliona Kirwan; Elizabeth Mallon; Mark Sibbering; Anthony Skene; Raghavan Vidya; Maggie Cheang; Jane Banerji; James Morden; Kally Sidhu; Andrew Dodson; Judith M Bliss; Mitch Dowsett Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 41.316