Julia E McGuinness1,2,3, Vicky Ro4, Simukayi Mutasa5, Samuel Pan6,7, Jianhua Hu6,7, Meghna S Trivedi4,6, Melissa K Accordino4,6, Kevin Kalinsky8, Dawn L Hershman4,6,9, Richard S Ha6,5, Katherine D Crew4,6,9. 1. Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. jem2280@cumc.columbia.edu. 2. Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. jem2280@cumc.columbia.edu. 3. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, Herbert Irving Pavilion 10th Floor, New York, NY, 10032, USA. jem2280@cumc.columbia.edu. 4. Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 6. Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. 9. Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We evaluated whether a novel, fully automated convolutional neural network (CNN)-based mammographic evaluation can predict breast cancer relapse among women with operable hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women with stage I-III, HR-positive unilateral breast cancer diagnosed at Columbia University Medical Center from 2007 to 2017, who received adjuvant endocrine therapy and had at least two mammograms (baseline, annual follow-up) of the contralateral unaffected breast for CNN analysis. We extracted demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, breast cancer treatments, and relapse status from the electronic health record. Our primary endpoint was change in CNN risk score (range, 0-1). We used two-sample t-tests to assess for difference in mean CNN scores between patients who relapsed vs. remained in remission, and conducted Cox regression analyses to assess for association between change in CNN score and breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), adjusting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 848 women followed for a median of 59 months, there were 67 (7.9%) breast cancer relapses (36 distant, 25 local, 6 new primaries). There was a significant difference in mean absolute change in CNN risk score from baseline to 1-year follow-up between those who relapsed vs. remained in remission (0.001 vs. - 0.022, p = 0.030). After adjustment for prognostic factors, a 0.01 absolute increase in CNN score at 1-year was significantly associated with BCFI, hazard ratio = 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval 1.01-1.09, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Short-term change in the CNN-based breast cancer risk model on adjuvant endocrine therapy predicts breast cancer relapse, and warrants further evaluation in prospective studies.
PURPOSE: We evaluated whether a novel, fully automated convolutional neural network (CNN)-based mammographic evaluation can predict breast cancer relapse among women with operable hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among women with stage I-III, HR-positive unilateral breast cancer diagnosed at Columbia University Medical Center from 2007 to 2017, who received adjuvant endocrine therapy and had at least two mammograms (baseline, annual follow-up) of the contralateral unaffected breast for CNN analysis. We extracted demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, breast cancer treatments, and relapse status from the electronic health record. Our primary endpoint was change in CNN risk score (range, 0-1). We used two-sample t-tests to assess for difference in mean CNN scores between patients who relapsed vs. remained in remission, and conducted Cox regression analyses to assess for association between change in CNN score and breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), adjusting for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 848 women followed for a median of 59 months, there were 67 (7.9%) breast cancer relapses (36 distant, 25 local, 6 new primaries). There was a significant difference in mean absolute change in CNN risk score from baseline to 1-year follow-up between those who relapsed vs. remained in remission (0.001 vs. - 0.022, p = 0.030). After adjustment for prognostic factors, a 0.01 absolute increase in CNN score at 1-year was significantly associated with BCFI, hazard ratio = 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval 1.01-1.09, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Short-term change in the CNN-based breast cancer risk model on adjuvant endocrine therapy predicts breast cancer relapse, and warrants further evaluation in prospective studies.
Authors: Norman F Boyd; Helen Guo; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Jennifer Stone; Eve Fishell; Roberta A Jong; Greg Hislop; Anna Chiarelli; Salomon Minkin; Martin J Yaffe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: N Harbeck; P Rastogi; M Martin; S M Tolaney; Z M Shao; P A Fasching; C S Huang; G G Jaliffe; A Tryakin; M P Goetz; H S Rugo; E Senkus; L Testa; M Andersson; K Tamura; L Del Mastro; G G Steger; H Kreipe; R Hegg; J Sohn; V Guarneri; J Cortés; E Hamilton; V André; R Wei; S Barriga; S Sherwood; T Forrester; M Munoz; A Shahir; B San Antonio; S C Nabinger; M Toi; S R D Johnston; J O'Shaughnessy Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jingmei Li; Keith Humphreys; Louise Eriksson; Gustaf Edgren; Kamila Czene; Per Hall Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hongchao Pan; Richard Gray; Jeremy Braybrooke; Christina Davies; Carolyn Taylor; Paul McGale; Richard Peto; Kathleen I Pritchard; Jonas Bergh; Mitch Dowsett; Daniel F Hayes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kyung Lan Ko; In Suk Shin; Ji Young You; So-Youn Jung; Jungsil Ro; Eun Sook Lee Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; Kathleen I Pritchard; Nicholas J Robert; Hyman Muss; Julie Gralow; Karen Gelmon; Tim Whelan; Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Sheldon Rubin; Keren Sturtz; Antonio C Wolff; Eric Winer; Clifford Hudis; Alison Stopeck; J Thaddeus Beck; Judith S Kaur; Kate Whelan; Dongsheng Tu; Wendy R Parulekar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Olivia Pagani; Prudence A Francis; Gini F Fleming; Barbara A Walley; Giuseppe Viale; Marco Colleoni; István Láng; Henry L Gómez; Carlo Tondini; Graziella Pinotti; Angelo Di Leo; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; Richard D Gelber; Meredith M Regan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Stephen R D Johnston; Nadia Harbeck; Roberto Hegg; Masakazu Toi; Miguel Martin; Zhi Min Shao; Qing Yuan Zhang; Jorge Luis Martinez Rodriguez; Mario Campone; Erika Hamilton; Joohyuk Sohn; Valentina Guarneri; Morihito Okada; Frances Boyle; Patrick Neven; Javier Cortés; Jens Huober; Andrew Wardley; Sara M Tolaney; Irfan Cicin; Ian C Smith; Martin Frenzel; Desirée Headley; Ran Wei; Belen San Antonio; Maarten Hulstijn; Joanne Cox; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Priya Rastogi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-09-20 Impact factor: 50.717