Literature DB >> 26858339

Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Lyndsay N Harris1, Nofisat Ismaila2, Lisa M McShane1, Fabrice Andre1, Deborah E Collyar1, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo1, Elizabeth H Hammond1, Nicole M Kuderer1, Minetta C Liu1, Robert G Mennel1, Catherine Van Poznak1, Robert C Bast1, Daniel F Hayes1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide recommendations on appropriate use of breast tumor biomarker assay results to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer.
METHODS: A literature search and prospectively defined study selection sought systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, prospective-retrospective studies, and prospective comparative observational studies published from 2006 through 2014. Outcomes of interest included overall survival and disease-free or recurrence-free survival. Expert panel members used informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.
RESULTS: The literature search identified 50 relevant studies. One randomized clinical trial and 18 prospective-retrospective studies were found to have evaluated the clinical utility, as defined by the guideline, of specific biomarkers for guiding decisions on the need for adjuvant systemic therapy. No studies that met guideline criteria for clinical utility were found to guide choice of specific treatments or regimens. RECOMMENDATIONS: In addition to estrogen and progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, the panel found sufficient evidence of clinical utility for the biomarker assays Oncotype DX, EndoPredict, PAM50, Breast Cancer Index, and urokinase plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in specific subgroups of breast cancer. No biomarker except for estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 was found to guide choices of specific treatment regimens. Treatment decisions should also consider disease stage, comorbidities, and patient preferences.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26858339      PMCID: PMC4933134          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.2289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  78 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issues.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Lisa M McShane; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  FOXP3 expression in cancer cells and anthracyclines efficacy in patients with primary breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in the phase III UNICANCER-PACS 01 trial.

Authors:  S Ladoire; G Mignot; C Dalban; A Chevriaux; L Arnould; C Rébé; L Apetoh; R Boidot; F Penault-Llorca; P Fumoleau; H Roché; M Spielmann; C Levy; A Lortholary; F Eichler; C Mesleard; F Bonnetain; F Ghiringhelli
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen response in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: the breast international group 1-98 trial.

Authors:  Meredith M Regan; Brian Leyland-Jones; Mark Bouzyk; Olivia Pagani; Weining Tang; Roswitha Kammler; Patrizia Dell'orto; Maria Olivia Biasi; Beat Thürlimann; Maria B Lyng; Henrik J Ditzel; Patrick Neven; Marc Debled; Rudolf Maibach; Karen N Price; Richard D Gelber; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch; James M Rae; Giuseppe Viale
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  p27Kip1 is a predictive factor for tamoxifen treatment response but not a prognostic marker in premenopausal breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Maria Stendahl; Sofie Nilsson; Caroline Wigerup; Karin Jirström; Per Ebbe Jönsson; Olle Stål; Göran Landberg
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The role of topoisomerase IIα in predicting sensitivity to anthracyclines in breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of published literatures.

Authors:  Yueyao Du; Qiong Zhou; Wenjin Yin; Liheng Zhou; Genhong Di; Zhenzhou Shen; Zhimin Shao; Jinsong Lu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Patient-centered care for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: a stepwise approach from the American Geriatrics Society: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  The predictive value of the 70-gene signature for adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Knauer; Stella Mook; Emiel J T Rutgers; Richard A Bender; Michael Hauptmann; Marc J van de Vijver; Rutger H T Koornstra; Jolien M Bueno-de-Mesquita; Sabine C Linn; Laura J van 't Veer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  The value of TOP2A gene copy number variation as a biomarker in breast cancer: Update of DBCG trial 89D.

Authors:  Kirsten Vang Nielsen; Bent Ejlertsen; Susanne Møller; Jan Trøst Jørgensen; Ann Knoop; Helle Knudsen; Henning T Mouridsen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  CYP2D6 and UGT2B7 genotype and risk of recurrence in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients.

Authors:  James M Rae; Suzy Drury; Daniel F Hayes; Vered Stearns; Jacklyn N Thibert; Ben P Haynes; Janine Salter; Ivana Sestak; Jack Cuzick; Mitch Dowsett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  CYP2D6 genotype and adjuvant tamoxifen: meta-analysis of heterogeneous study populations.

Authors:  M A Province; M P Goetz; H Brauch; D A Flockhart; J M Hebert; R Whaley; V J Suman; W Schroth; S Winter; H Zembutsu; T Mushiroda; W G Newman; M-T M Lee; C B Ambrosone; M W Beckmann; J-Y Choi; A-S Dieudonné; P A Fasching; R Ferraldeschi; L Gong; E Haschke-Becher; A Howell; L B Jordan; U Hamann; K Kiyotani; P Krippl; D Lambrechts; A Latif; U Langsenlehner; W Lorizio; P Neven; A T Nguyen; B-W Park; C A Purdie; P Quinlan; W Renner; M Schmidt; M Schwab; J-G Shin; J C Stingl; P Wegman; S Wingren; A H B Wu; E Ziv; G Zirpoli; A M Thompson; V C Jordan; Y Nakamura; R B Altman; M M Ames; R M Weinshilboum; M Eichelbaum; J N Ingle; T E Klein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  265 in total

1.  Clinical utility of multigene profiling assays in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  M C Chang; L H Souter; S Kamel-Reid; M Rutherford; P Bedard; M Trudeau; J Hart; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on Therapy Selection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  E Nilüfer Güler
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-10-01

3.  Outcomes in patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent a 21-gene expression assay.

Authors:  Carlos H Barcenas; Akshara Raghavendra; Arup K Sinha; Masood Pasha Syed; Limin Hsu; Modesto G Patangan; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Yu Shen; Gabriel H Hortobagyi; Vicente Valero; Sharon H Giordano; Naoto T Ueno; Debu Tripathy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Evaluation of Prognosis in Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative and Lymph Node-Negative Breast Cancer With Low Oncotype DX Recurrence Score.

Authors:  Jane Meisel; Chao Zhang; Cameron Neely; Pia Mendoza; Shuo You; Tatiana Han; Yuan Liu; Aysegul A Sahin; Ruth O'Regan; Xiaoxian Li
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Aneuploidy, TP53 mutation, and amplification of MYC correlate with increased intratumor heterogeneity and poor prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Johanna Oltmann; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Leanora S Hernandez; Rüdiger Meyer; Irianna Torres; Yue Hu; Natalie Doberstein; J Keith Killian; David Petersen; Yuelin Jack Zhu; Daniel C Edelman; Paul S Meltzer; Russell Schwartz; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Gert Auer; Jens K Habermann; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 5.006

6.  CYP2D6 genotype is not associated with survival in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  D L Hertz; K M Kidwell; S G Hilsenbeck; S Oesterreich; C K Osborne; S Philips; C Chenault; R J Hartmaier; T C Skaar; M J Sikora; J M Rae
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Comparison of Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score® with other risk assessment tools including the Nottingham Prognostic Index in the identification of patients with low-risk invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Maura Bríd Cotter; Alex Dakin; Aoife Maguire; Janice M Walshe; M John Kennedy; Barbara Dunne; Ciarán Ó Riain; Cecily M Quinn
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 8.  Incorporation of clinical and biological factors improves prognostication and reflects contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  Rashmi K Murthy; Juhee Song; Akshara S Raghavendra; Yisheng Li; Limin Hsu; Kenneth R Hess; Carlos H Barcenas; Vicente Valero; Robert W Carlson; Debu Tripathy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-25

9.  Large-scale DNA organization is a prognostic marker of breast cancer survival.

Authors:  Martial Guillaud; Qian Ye; Sam Leung; Anita Carraro; Alan Harrison; Malcolm Hayes; Alan Nichol; Mira Keyes
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Clinical utility of gene-expression signatures in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maryann Kwa; Andreas Makris; Francisco J Esteva
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 66.675

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.