Literature DB >> 17409482

The influence of electrolyte composition on the in vitro charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) stimulation electrodes.

Stuart F Cogan1, Philip R Troyk, Julia Ehrlich, Christina M Gasbarro, Timothy D Plante.   

Abstract

The effects of ionic conductivity and buffer concentration of electrolytes used for in vitro measurement of the charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) neural stimulation electrodes have been investigated. Charge-injection limits of AIROF microelectrodes were measured in saline with a range of phosphate buffer concentrations from [PO(4)(3-)] = 0 to [PO(4)(3-)] = 103 mM and ionic conductivities from 2-28 mS cm(-1). The charge-injection limits were insensitive to the buffer concentration, but varied significantly with ionic conductivity. Using 0.4 ms cathodal current pulses at 50 Hz, the charge-injection limit increased from 0.5 mC cm(-2) to 2.1 mC cm(-2) as the conductivity was increased from 2 mS cm(-1) to 28 mS cm(-1). An explanation is proposed in which the observed dependence on ionic conductivity arises from non-uniform reduction and oxidation within the porous AIROF and from uncorrected iR-drops that result in an overestimation of the redox potential during pulsing. Conversely, slow-sweep-rate cyclic voltammograms (CVs) were sensitive to buffer concentration with the potentials of the primary Ir(3+)/Ir(4+) reduction and oxidation reactions shifting approximately 300 mV as the buffer concentration decreased from [PO(4)(3-)] = 103 mM to [PO(4)(3-)] = 0 mM. The CV response was insensitive to ionic conductivity. A comparison of in vitro AIROF charge-injection limits in commonly employed electrolyte models of extracellular fluid revealed a significant dependence on the electrolyte, with more than a factor of 4 difference under some pulsing conditions, emphasizing the need to select an electrolyte model that closely matches the conductivity and ionic composition of the in vivo environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17409482     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  15 in total

1.  Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  S F Cogan; T D Plante; J Ehrlich
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

2.  Seizure entrainment with polarizing low-frequency electric fields in a chronic animal epilepsy model.

Authors:  Sridhar Sunderam; Nick Chernyy; Nathalia Peixoto; Jonathan P Mason; Steven L Weinstein; Steven J Schiff; Bruce J Gluckman
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Amorphous silicon carbide ultramicroelectrode arrays for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Felix Deku; Yarden Cohen; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Aswini Kanneganti; Timothy J Gardner; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  A hermetic wireless subretinal neurostimulator for vision prostheses.

Authors:  Shawn K Kelly; Douglas B Shire; Jinghua Chen; Patrick Doyle; Marcus D Gingerich; Stuart F Cogan; William A Drohan; Sonny Behan; Luke Theogarajan; John L Wyatt; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Mechanisms determining safety and performance of brain stimulating electrodes.

Authors:  Dana Lynn Andre; Balaji Shanmugasundaram; Jonathan Mason; Corina Drapaca; Bruce J Gluckman
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

6.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Biomaterials-based electronics: polymers and interfaces for biology and medicine.

Authors:  Meredith Muskovich; Christopher J Bettinger
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Electrochemical characteristics of ultramicro-dimensioned SIROF electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  A Ghazavi; J Maeng; M Black; S Salvi; S F Cogan
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Charge injection characteristics of sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Sputtered iridium oxide films for neural stimulation electrodes.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Julia Ehrlich; Timothy D Plante; Anton Smirnov; Douglas B Shire; Marcus Gingerich; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.