| Literature DB >> 34148068 |
Deepika Sankaran1, Lida Zeinali2, Sameeia Iqbal3, Praveen Chandrasekharan4, Satyan Lakshminrusimha2.
Abstract
Wide fluctuations in partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) can potentially be associated with neurological and lung injury in neonates. Blood gas measurement is the gold standard for assessing gas exchange but is intermittent, invasive, and contributes to iatrogenic blood loss. Non-invasive carbon dioxide (CO2) monitoring has become ubiquitous in anesthesia and critical care and is being increasingly used in neonates. Two common methods of non-invasive CO2 monitoring are end-tidal and transcutaneous. A colorimetric CO2 detector (a modified end-tidal CO2 detector) is recommended by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) and the American Academy of Pediatrics to confirm endotracheal tube placement. Continuous CO2 monitoring is helpful in trending PaCO2 in critically ill neonates on respiratory support and can potentially lead to early detection and minimization of fluctuations in PaCO2. This review includes a description of the various types of CO2 monitoring and their applications, benefits, and limitations in neonates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34148068 PMCID: PMC8214374 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-021-01134-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Perinatol ISSN: 0743-8346 Impact factor: 2.521
Fig. 1Time capnogram in which end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) is traced against time.
Phase I represents the gas from the anatomical and apparatus dead space and hence is CO2-free. Phase II has a rapid S-shaped upswing (mixing of alveolar gas with the dead space gas). Phase III or the alveolar plateau represents exhaled gas that is rich in CO2 from the alveoli. Variation in the ventilation/ perfusion (V/Q) status of the alveoli can result in phase III being an extension of phase II. Phase IV or beaking is noted with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) due to collapse and exhalation of alveolar gas. The change in the waveform in RDS, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and esophageal intubation are also shown. The capnogram in BPD shows an exaggerated PaCO2–EtCO2 gradient in BPD. PaCO2 arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide. Copyright Satyan Lakshminrusimha.
Summary of the advantages and disadvantages of currently used methods of carbon dioxide monitoring in neonates.
| Type of CO2 monitoring | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Mainstream EtCO2 | Rapid response time, especially helpful in sick neonates in respiratory distress Non-invasive Continuous monitoring is feasible | Physiological dead space and air leakage around the ETT leads to underestimation of PCO2 Can be inconvenient and adds weight and dead space, which may cause auto-triggering of ventilators. Not reliable in infants with severe lung disease and V/Q mismatch. Cannot be used with non-invasive ventilation in spontaneously breathing infants and with high-frequency ventilation. |
| Sidestream EtCO2 | Easier to use, more convenient with less weight added to the ET tube. Exhaled gas sampled before entry into breathing circuit, thus reducing dilution with dead space gas. | Can be affected by secretions and blockage of the sampling tube. 1–4 second delay in CO2 reading and capnogram; hence not useful in small tidal volume and fast respiratory rate |
| Transcutaneous CO2 (TcPCO2) | Decreases the need for frequent and repeated arterial blood gases. Better correlation with PaCO2 during transport in ventilated infants. Helpful in following the trend in PCO2 Can be used with high-frequency ventilators and non-invasive ventilation | Inaccurate in the setting of improper placement, entrapped air bubbles, error in the equipment, or in calibration. The stabilization time of ~20 minutes prior to reading the TcCO2. Not reliable in infants with impaired perfusion, acidosis, edema, or vasoconstrictor medications. Risk of burns in the skin; the need for periodical change in its position. |
| Colorimetric CO2 detector (CCDD) | Rapid ascertainment of ETT placement, especially in the delivery room during resuscitation. | False-negative in the setting of poor lung perfusion from low cardiac output, pulmonary hypoplasia, low tidal volumes, and air leak (Fig. |
PaCO2 arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, EtCO2 end-tidal CO2, TcPCO transcutaneous CO2, CO2 carbon dioxide, V/Q ventilation/ perfusion ratio, CCDD colorimetric carbon dioxide detector.
Fig. 2Types of EtCO2 monitoring.
An illustration of sidestream (A) and mainstream (B) non-invasive CO2 monitoring. The difference in dead space and sampling method is shown. EtCO2 end-tidal carbon dioxide. Copyright Satyan Lakshminrusimha.
Fig. 3Trancutaneous CO2 monitoring.
The structure, advantages (green box), and disadvantages (red boxes) of transcutaneous CO2 (TcPCO2) monitoring in neonates. Copyright Satyan Lakshminrusimha.
Fig. 4Confirmation of the endotracheal tube (ETT) placement in the delivery room.
Of all these markers, colorimetric CO2 detection and chest radiograph (X-ray) are helpful in confirming appropriate ETT placement. SpO2: oxygen saturation. Copyright Satyan Lakshminrusimha.
Fig. 5Importance of capnography in confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) position.
While chest radiograph is considered confirmatory, an antero-posterior (AP) view can be deceiving (A) and a cross-table view might be more accurate in diagnosing esophageal intubation (B). Combining an AP view with capnography may be more reliable. Copyright Satyan Lakshminrusimha.
Fig. 6Causes for persistent purple coloration of colorimetric CO2 detector in neonates.
The most common reason is esophageal intubation. The other causes can be classified into inadequate ventilation and poor alveolar perfusion. PIP peak inflation pressure, PCO2 partial pressure of carbon dioxide. LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle. Copyright Satyan Lakshminrusimha.
Gaps in knowledge related to using non-invasive CO2 monitoring in neonates.
| Type of CO2 monitoring | Existing gaps in knowledge |
|---|---|
| End-tidal CO2 monitoring (EtCO2) | Is EtCO2 monitoring feasible during delivery room resuscitation of newborns? Can EtCO2 monitoring be helpful in the delivery room to optimize neonatal ventilation and allow gentle ventilation? Can routine EtCO2 monitoring help in detecting the return of spontaneous circulation in asphyxiated newborns undergoing resuscitation in the delivery room? Should respiratory function monitors with the ability to measure exhaled CO2, inflation pressure, tidal volume, and air leak around the mask, be routinely used in the delivery room? |
| Transcutaneous CO2 monitoring (TcPCO2) | Is it safe, accurate, and reliable in extremely premature and ill neonates? Can TcPCO2 be used to guide clinical decisions in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy undergoing therapeutic hypothermia? Is TcPCO2 reliable and in agreement with PaCO2 during surgery/ anesthesia in neonates? Can this technique be used to monitor tissue perfusion and cellular metabolic function? Can relative heating power be used to assess perfusion status? |
| Colorimetric carbon dioxide detectors (CCDD) | Can routine use with face mask ventilation in the delivery room be beneficial? Can corrective actions for improving the effectiveness of positive pressure ventilation be performed earlier if CCDD is routinely used with facemask ventilation? Can the current pitfalls (inaccuracy due to soiling with epinephrine/ secretions) be overcome? Are CCDD helpful in confirming the position of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) catheters, and with laryngeal mask airways (LMA)? |
PaCO arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, EtCO end-tidal CO2, TcPCO transcutaneous CO2, CCDD colorimetric carbon dioxide detector.