Literature DB >> 16396845

Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects.

Colm P F O'Donnell1, C Omar F Kamlin, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endotracheal intubation of newborn infants is a mandatory competence for many pediatric trainees. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommends a 20-second limit for intubation attempts. Intubation attempts by junior doctors are frequently unsuccessful, and many infants are intubated between 20 and 30 seconds without apparent adverse effect. Little is known about the proficiency of more senior medical staff, the time taken to determine endotracheal tube (ETT) position, or the effects of attempted intubation on infants' heart rate (HR) and oxygen saturation (Spo2) in the delivery room (DR). The objectives of this study were to determine (1) the success rates and duration of intubation attempts during DR resuscitation, (2) whether experience is associated with greater success rates and shorter time taken to intubate, (3) the time taken to identify ETT position after intubation, and (4) the frequency with which infants deteriorated during intubation attempts and the time at which this occurred.
METHODS: We reviewed videos of DR resuscitations; identified whether intubation was attempted; and, when attempted, whether intubation was attempted by a resident, a fellow, or a consultant. We defined the duration of an intubation attempt as the time from the introduction of the laryngoscope blade to the mouth to its removal, regardless of whether an ETT was introduced. We determined the time from removal of the laryngoscope to the clinicians' decision as to whether the intubation was successful and noted the basis on which this decision was made (clinical assessment, flow signals, or exhaled carbon dioxide [ETCO2] detection). We determined success according to clinical signs in all cases and used flow signals that were obtained during ventilation via the ETT or ETCO2 when available. When neither was available, the chest radiograph on admission to the NICU was reviewed. For infants who were monitored with pulse oximetry, we determined their HR and Spo2 before the intubation attempt. We then determined whether either or both fell by > or =10% during the attempt and, if so, at what time it occurred.
RESULTS: We reviewed 122 video recordings in which orotracheal intubation was attempted 60 times in 31 infants. We secondarily verified ETT position using flow signals, ETCO2, or chest radiographs after 94% of attempts in which an ETT was introduced. Thirty-seven (62%) attempts were successful. Success rates and mean (SD) time to intubate successfully by group were as follows: residents: 24%, 49 seconds (13 seconds); fellows: 78%, 32 seconds (13 seconds); and consultants: 86%, 25 seconds (17 seconds). Of the 23 unsuccessful attempts, 13 were abandoned without an attempt to pass an ETT and 10 were placed incorrectly. The time to determine ETT position in the DR was longer when clinical assessment alone was used. Infants who were monitored with oximetry deteriorated during nearly half of the intubation attempts. Deterioration seemed more likely when HR and Spo2 were low before the attempt.
CONCLUSIONS: Intubation attempts often are unsuccessful, and successful attempts frequently take >30 seconds. Greater experience is associated with greater success rates and shorter duration of successful attempts. Flow signals and ETCO2 may be useful in determining ETT position more quickly than clinical assessment alone. Infants frequently deteriorate during intubation attempts. Improved monitoring of infants who are resuscitated in the DR is desirable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16396845     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-0901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  55 in total

1.  Chest compressions and epinephrine during resuscitation of infants born at the border of viability: Yes, no or maybe?

Authors:  Gregory P Moore; Thierry Daboval; Kevin W Coughlin
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Pulse oximetry for monitoring infants in the delivery room: a review.

Authors:  J A Dawson; P G Davis; C P F O'Donnell; C O F Kamlin; C J Morley
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  A novel airway device with tactile sensing capabilities for verifying correct endotracheal tube placement.

Authors:  Pauwel Goethals; Harshu Chaobal; Dominiek Reynaerts; David Schaner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Comparison of a ferret model with an inanimate simulator for training novices in techniques for intubating neonates.

Authors:  J Kevin Grayson; Antoinette M Shinn; M Vicki Potts; Jennifer J Hatzfeld; Jerry M Cline
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Neonatal Intubation Practice and Outcomes: An International Registry Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Foglia; Anne Ades; Taylor Sawyer; Kristen M Glass; Neetu Singh; Philipp Jung; Bin Huey Quek; Lindsay C Johnston; James Barry; Jeanne Zenge; Ahmed Moussa; Jae H Kim; Stephen D DeMeo; Natalie Napolitano; Vinay Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Mind the gap: can videolaryngoscopy bridge the competency gap in neonatal endotracheal intubation among pediatric trainees? a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  S Parmekar; J L Arnold; C Anselmo; M Pammi; J Hagan; C J Fernandes; K Lingappan
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency patients: higher frequency of failed attempts and adverse effects found by video review.

Authors:  Benjamin T Kerrey; Andrea S Rinderknecht; Gary L Geis; Lise E Nigrovic; Matthew R Mittiga
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Is volume and leak monitoring feasible during nasopharyngeal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates?

Authors:  Hendrik S Fischer; Charles C Roehr; Hans Proquitté; Hannes Hammer; Roland R Wauer; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.