Literature DB >> 3373455

Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi.

A Guppy1, R B Coles.   

Abstract

1. The maximum acoustic gain of the external ear in Macroderma gigas was found to be 25-30 dB between 5-8 kHz and in Nyctophilus gouldi it reached 15-23 dB between 7-22 kHz. Pinna gain reached a peak of 16 dB near 4.5-6 kHz in M. gigas and 12-17 dB between 7-12 kHz in N. gouldi, with average gain of 6-10 dB up to 100 kHz. Pinna gain curves resemble that of a finite conical horn, including resonance. 2. The directional properties of the external ear in both species result from sound diffraction at the pinna face, as it approximates a circular aperture. The frequency dependent movement of the acoustic axis in azimuth and elevation is attributed to the asymmetrical structure of the pinnae. 3. Evoked potentials and neuronal responses were studied in the inferior colliculus. In M. gigas, the neural audiogram has sensitivity peaks at 10-20 kHz and 35-43 kHz, with extremely low thresholds (-18 dB SPL) in the low frequency region. In N. gouldi, the neural audiogram has sensitivity peaks at 8-14 kHz (lowest threshold 5 dB SPL) and 22-45 kHz. Removal of the contralateral pinna causes a frequency dependent loss in neural threshold sensitivity of up to 10-15 dB in both species. 4. The high frequency peak in the audiogram coincides with the sonar energy band in both species, whereas the low frequency region is used for social communication. Highly sensitive low frequency hearing is discussed in relation to hunting in bats by passive listening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3373455     DOI: 10.1007/bf01342641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  8 in total

1.  R OLE OF THE PINNA IN HEARING.

Authors:  W E FLYNN; D N ELLIOTT
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics.

Authors:  M D Tuttle; M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Hearing sensitivity in bats.

Authors:  J I Dalland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Neural mechanisms of sound localization in an echolocating bat.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; G D Pollak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Functional classes of neurons in primary auditory cortex of the cat distinguished by sensitivity to sound location.

Authors:  J C Middlebrooks; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Physical models for the analysis of acoustical systems in biology.

Authors:  N H Fletcher; S Thwaites
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.318

7.  Neural correlates of vertical localization by echo-locating bats.

Authors:  A D Grinnell; V S Grinnell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Vocal communication in the pallid bat, Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  P Brown
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1976-05
  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  The effect of temporal structure on rustling-sound detection in the gleaning bat, Megaderma lyra.

Authors:  M Hübner; L Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; D J Hartley; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Hearing in the FM-bat Phyllostomus discolor: a behavioral audiogram.

Authors:  K H Esser; A Daucher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Biophysics of directional hearing in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis).

Authors:  Hilary S Bierman; Jennifer L Thornton; Heath G Jones; Kanthaiah Koka; Bruce A Young; Christian Brandt; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory evoked potentials in the hedgehog tenrec, Echinops telfairi.

Authors:  Markus Drexl; Michael Faulstich; Boris Von Stebut; Susanne Radtke-Schuller; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-23

7.  Auditory sensitivity and frequency selectivity in greater spear-nosed bats suggest specializations for acoustic communication.

Authors:  K M Bohn; J W Boughman; G S Wilkinson; C F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Passive sound localization of prey by the pallid bat (Antrozous p. pallidus).

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; P Buttenhoff; B Andrews; J M Kennedy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Frequency sensitivity and directional hearing in the gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus (Linnaeus 1758).

Authors:  R B Coles; A Guppy; M E Anderson; P Schlegel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Directional hearing in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R B Coles; A Guppy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.