Literature DB >> 1573571

Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Z M Fuzessery1, D J Hartley, J J Wenstrup.   

Abstract

1. The directionality of an echolocation system is determined by the acoustic properties of both the emitter and receiver, i.e., by the radiation pattern of the emitted pulse and the directionally of the external ears. We measured the directionality of the echolocation system of the greater mustache bat (Pteronotus parnellii) at the 30 kHz, 60 kHz and 90 kHz harmonics of its echolocation pulse by summing, at points throughout the frontal sound field, the echo attenuation due to the spread of pulse energy and the attenuation due to the spread of pulse energy and the attenuation due to the directionality of its external ears. The pulse radiation pattern at the 3 harmonics was measured by comparing the output of a microphone moved throughout the frontal sound field against a second reference microphone at the center of the field. External ear directionality at the 3. harmonics was measured by presenting free-field sounds throughout the frontal sound field, and recording the intensity thresholds of cochlear microphonic potentials, and the intensity thresholds of monaural neurons in the inferior colliculus tuned to one of the 3 harmonics. 2. When compared with ear directionality, the echolocation system was found to be more directional for the center of the sound field in several respects. At all harmonics, attenuation of sounds originating in the peripheral part of the field was increased by 10 to 13 dB. Areas of maximum sound intensity contracted toward the center of the field. Also, the isointensity contours of the echolocation system were more radially symmetrical about the center of the field. 3. At 60 kHz, sound intensity along the azimuth within the echolocation system was nearly constant 26 degrees to either side of the center of the field. This suggests that the radiation pattern of the echolocation pulse and the directionality of the external ears complement one another to produce an acoustic environment at the center of the sound field in which stimulus intensity is stabilized to allow more effective analysis of various aspects of the echolocation target. In particular, we suggest that this intensity stabilization may allow the bat to more effectively resolve the interaural intensity differences it uses to localize prey. 4. Predictions of the azimuthal spatial tuning of binaurally sensitive neurons in the inferior colliculus within the echolocation system were compared with their spatial tuning when only ear directionality is considered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1573571     DOI: 10.1007/bf00190401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  19 in total

1.  Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics.

Authors:  M D Tuttle; M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Speculations on the role of frequency in sound localization.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Binaural neurons in the mustache bat's inferior colliculus. II. Determinants of spatial responses among 60-kHz EI units.

Authors:  J J Wenstrup; Z M Fuzessery; G D Pollak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Automatic gain control in the bat's sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation.

Authors:  S A Kick; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats.

Authors:  B D Lawrence; J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Echo intensity compensation by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J B Kobler; B S Wilson; O W Henson; A L Bishop
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  The activity and function of the middle-ear muscles in echo-locating bats.

Authors:  O W Henson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi.

Authors:  A Guppy; R B Coles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Sonar tracking of horizontally moving targets by the big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  W M Masters; A J Moffat; J A Simmons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Frequency sensitivity and directional hearing in the gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus (Linnaeus 1758).

Authors:  R B Coles; A Guppy; M E Anderson; P Schlegel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems.

Authors:  M E Nelson; M A MacIver
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  What noseleaves do for FM bats depends on their degree of sensorial specialization.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Fons De Mey; Herbert Peremans; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth Kalko; Uwe Firzlaff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Dominant glint based prey localization in horseshoe bats: a possible strategy for noise rejection.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Jonas Reijniers; Uwe Firzlaff; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.