Literature DB >> 17839660

Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics.

M D Tuttle, M J Ryan.   

Abstract

Bat predation has probably had an important influence on the evolution of frog vocalizations in the Neotropics. The rate at which fringe-lipped bats capture frogs is significantly higher when the frogs are calling. These bats respond to a wide variety of calls from edible frogs, and, when simultaneously presented with a choice, choose the recorded call of a palatable species over that of a poisonous species and the call of a small species over that of one too large to capture. Thus the selective advantages of loud, rapid mating calls in anurans are balanced by an increased risk of predation.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 17839660     DOI: 10.1126/science.214.4521.677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  50 in total

1.  Auditory-based defence against gleaning bats in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Hannah M ter Hofstede; Elisabeth K V Kalko; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Mimicry as a novel pathway linking biodiversity functions and individual behavioural performances.

Authors:  Paola Laiolo; José Ramón Obeso; Yari Roggia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; D J Hartley; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Flexibility in assessment of prey cues: frog-eating bats and frog calls.

Authors:  Rachel A Page; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The paradox of hearing at the lek: auditory sensitivity increases after breeding in female gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Mark A Bee; Megan D Gall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Sequential assessment of prey through the use of multiple sensory cues by an eavesdropping bat.

Authors:  Rachel A Page; Tanja Schnelle; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Thomas Bunge; Ximena E Bernal
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-05-17

7.  When to approach novel prey cues? Social learning strategies in frog-eating bats.

Authors:  Patricia L Jones; Michael J Ryan; Victoria Flores; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Do frog-eating bats perceptually bind the complex components of frog calls?

Authors:  Patricia L Jones; Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan; Rachel A Page
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Collateral damage or a shadow of safety? The effects of signalling heterospecific neighbours on the risks of parasitism and predation.

Authors:  Paula A Trillo; Ximena E Bernal; Michael S Caldwell; Wouter H Halfwerk; Mallory O Wessel; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi.

Authors:  A Guppy; R B Coles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.