Literature DB >> 2746553

Frequency sensitivity and directional hearing in the gleaning bat, Plecotus auritus (Linnaeus 1758).

R B Coles1, A Guppy, M E Anderson, P Schlegel.   

Abstract

1. The neural audiogram of the common long-eared bat, Plecotus auritus was recorded from the inferior colliculus (IC). The most sensitive best frequency (BF) thresholds for single neurones are below 0 dB SPL between 7-20 kHz, reaching a best value of -20 dB SPL between 12-20 kHz. The lower and upper limits of hearing occur at 3 kHz and 63 kHz, respectively, based on BF thresholds at 80 dB SPL. BF threshold sensitivities are about 10 dB SPL between 25-50 kHz, corresponding to the energy band of the sonar pulse (26-78 kHz). The tonotopic organization of the central nucleus of the IC (ICC) reveals that neurones with BFs below 20 kHz are disproportionately represented, occupying about 30% of ICC volume, occurring in the more rostral and lateral regions of the nucleus. 2. The acoustical gain of the external ear reaches a peak of about 20 dB between 8-20 kHz. The gain of the pinna increases rapidly above 4 kHz, to a peak of about 15 dB at 7-12 kHz. The pinna gain curve is similar to that of a simple, finite length acoustic horn; expected horn gain is calculated from the average dimensions of the pinna. 3. The directional properties of the external ear are based on sound diffraction by the pinna mouth, which, to a first approximation, is equivalent to an elliptical opening due to the elongated shape of the pinna. The spatial receptive field properties for IC neurones are related to the directional properties of the pinna. The position of the acoustic axis of the pinna and the best position (BP) of spatial receptive fields are both about 25 degrees from the midline between 8-30 kHz but approach the midline to 8 degrees at 45 kHz. In elevation, the acoustic axis and the BP of receptive fields move upwards by 20 degrees between 9-25 kHz, remaining stationary for frequencies up to 60 kHz. 4. The extremely high auditory sensitivity shown by the audiogram and the directionality of hearing are discussed in terms of the adaptation of the auditory system to low frequencies and the role of a large pinna in P. auritus. The functional significance of low frequency hearing in P. auritus is discussed in relation to hunting for prey by listening and is compared to other gleaning species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2746553     DOI: 10.1007/bf00619201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  7 in total

1.  The neurophysiology of audition in bats: directional localization and binaural interaction.

Authors:  A D GRINNELL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The neurophysiology of audition in bats: intensity and frequency parameters.

Authors:  A D GRINNELL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics.

Authors:  M D Tuttle; M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Physical models for the analysis of acoustical systems in biology.

Authors:  N H Fletcher; S Thwaites
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.318

5.  Neural correlates of vertical localization by echo-locating bats.

Authors:  A D Grinnell; V S Grinnell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Acoustical and neural aspects of hearing in the Australian gleaning bats, Macroderma gigas and Nyctophilus gouldi.

Authors:  A Guppy; R B Coles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba).

Authors:  R S Payne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats.

Authors:  M W Holderied; O von Helversen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Spatial processing within the mustache bat echolocation system: possible mechanisms for optimization.

Authors:  Z M Fuzessery; D J Hartley; J J Wenstrup
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Body mass explains digestive traits in small vespertilionid bats.

Authors:  Iván Cabrera-Campos; Jorge D Carballo-Morales; Romeo A Saldaña-Vázquez; Federico Villalobos; Jorge Ayala-Berdon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Variability in echolocation call intensity in a community of horseshoe bats: a role for resource partitioning or communication?

Authors:  Maike Schuchmann; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Can two streams of auditory information be processed simultaneously? Evidence from the gleaning bat Antrozous pallidus.

Authors:  J R Barber; K A Razak; Z M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory sensitivity and frequency selectivity in greater spear-nosed bats suggest specializations for acoustic communication.

Authors:  K M Bohn; J W Boughman; G S Wilkinson; C F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Body lift, drag and power are relatively higher in large-eared than in small-eared bat species.

Authors:  Jonas Håkansson; Lasse Jakobsen; Anders Hedenström; L Christoffer Johansson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Neural responses to free-field auditory stimulation in the superior colliculus of the wallaby (Macropus eugenii).

Authors:  D J Withington; R F Mark; S K Thornton; G B Liu; K G Hill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  High-throughput sequencing offers insight into mechanisms of resource partitioning in cryptic bat species.

Authors:  Orly Razgour; Elizabeth L Clare; Matt R K Zeale; Julia Hanmer; Ida Bærholm Schnell; Morten Rasmussen; Thomas P Gilbert; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Table for five, please: Dietary partitioning in boreal bats.

Authors:  Eero J Vesterinen; Anna I E Puisto; Anna S Blomberg; Thomas M Lilley
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.